Kuriko wrote:404 not found :/
Works fine for me, maybe try this one without fancy stuff?
http://tspforums.xyz/thread-6363.html
Advertisement
by Lord Dominator » Sun Aug 26, 2018 8:28 pm
Kuriko wrote:404 not found :/
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Sun Aug 26, 2018 8:45 pm
Lord Dominator wrote:Kuriko wrote:404 not found :/
Works fine for me, maybe try this one without fancy stuff?
http://tspforums.xyz/thread-6363.html
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Unibot III » Sun Aug 26, 2018 9:09 pm
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Kringalia » Sun Aug 26, 2018 11:12 pm
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:we've just been following their (silly) ground rules)
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Sun Aug 26, 2018 11:44 pm
Roavin wrote:The logs are currently classified but are available to the court upon request.
Roavin wrote:Mall wrote:How is a conversation between Ever Wandering Souls and Imki confidential and thus not subject to open disclosure to this court if the conversation is between Imki and the person who the Cabinet is refusing to disclose it to?
The issue isn't that Petitioner receives the conversation, but rather that it originated from private conversation and Imki herself has only cleared it to be shared with Cabinet, not publicly.
Mal wrote:A full copy of the conversation between Ever Wandering Souls and Imkitopia has been provided to the Court in private. I see no reason why any of this conversation should be considered classified, but we are available to work with the Court to redact the logs as necessary pursuant to Article VIII, Section 2 of the Judicial Act.
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Kringalia » Mon Aug 27, 2018 7:49 am
by Consular » Tue Aug 28, 2018 4:01 am
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Tue Aug 28, 2018 9:30 am
Consular wrote:Honestly I find it kind of silly that they're even humoring you.
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Glen-Rhodes » Tue Aug 28, 2018 10:11 am
by Lord Dominator » Tue Aug 28, 2018 10:20 am
Glen-Rhodes wrote:Foreign subjects of proscriptions don’t have the right to a fair trial, so it indeed would be farcical to portray a judicial review that way. Your case isn’t a trial. In either case, TSP’s court is not adversarial.
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Tue Aug 28, 2018 10:22 am
Glen-Rhodes wrote:Foreign subjects of proscriptions don’t have the right to a fair trial, so it indeed would be farcical to portray a judicial review that way. Your case isn’t a trial. In either case, TSP’s court is not adversarial.
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Lord Dominator » Tue Aug 28, 2018 2:24 pm
by Lord Dominator » Tue Aug 28, 2018 2:30 pm
United Massachusetts wrote:What on Earth happened in TSP?
by United Massachusetts » Tue Aug 28, 2018 2:31 pm
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Tue Aug 28, 2018 2:39 pm
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Lord Dominator » Tue Aug 28, 2018 2:52 pm
by Custadia » Tue Aug 28, 2018 3:06 pm
by Land Without Shrimp » Tue Aug 28, 2018 3:21 pm
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Tue Aug 28, 2018 3:23 pm
Custadia wrote:Did... did I do this? I put Escade's name on that toxicity survey. I certainly didn't mean to do this.
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Tue Aug 28, 2018 3:55 pm
Tim on Discord wrote:Tim Today at 16:28
*throws the TWP chat a fun TSP related bone*
Tim Today at 16:28Tim Today at 5:26 PM
Hey if anybody actually finds out what TSP's evidence is, please let me know
Because they won't let me see it, despite the fact that I'm the one who said it, and won't share it with others because it "violates (my) privacy"
Tim Today at 16:29
Meaning TSP supposedly has all this evidence, but won't show it to literally... anyone
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Cormactopia Prime » Tue Aug 28, 2018 4:08 pm
by McChimp » Tue Aug 28, 2018 4:17 pm
Custadia wrote:Did... did I do this? I put Escade's name on that toxicity survey. I certainly didn't mean to do this.
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Tue Aug 28, 2018 4:18 pm
Cormactopia Prime wrote:You've swept toxicity under the rug by banning one faction. You haven't fixed it.
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Emagination, Epithemia, Google [Bot]
Advertisement