[PASSED] Repeal Liberate The Communal Confederacy

by **Kuriko** » Thu Aug 23, 2018 12:52 pm

I'm bringing this back up for discussion I guess, with a new thread from my new main nation. Its been almost three months since I founded TCC after it CTEd on its own, and I don't plan on letting the founder CTE any time soon nor do I have the time or inclination to build a community. As far as I'm concerned, this liberation is now pointless and if I ever do end up CTEing I don't want someone to turn it into a trophy because it has a liberation badge.

The Security Council,

Acknowledging that at the time of its passage, SC#244 Liberate The Communal Confederacy was enacted without native consent;

Believing that SC#244 was necessary at the time, allowing the region to be freed from Kaiserreich’s control by defender forces and preventing it from becoming a trophy region to invading forces;

Noting that all native nations have either entered the void or moved on to the region Economic Union of Non Aligned Nations;

Further believing that SC#244 has served its purpose, and is no longer needed due to an active founder nation;

Hereby repeals SC#244 Liberate The Communal Confederacy.

Edit 1: Added Fauxia's suggestion.
Edit 2: Submitted

by **Fauxia** » Thu Aug 23, 2018 1:52 pm

Should probably state that as it’s no longer founderless, there’s no threat anymore.

Good stuff as usual, Kuri.

by **Kuriko** » Thu Aug 23, 2018 1:55 pm

Fauxia wrote:Should probably state that as it’s no longer founderless, there’s no threat anymore.

Good stuff as usual, Kuri.

Thanks Fauxia! I've edited it to include that ^_^

by **Thatcher Whitehall** » Thu Aug 23, 2018 4:16 pm

Reasonable enough. Support from me, Kuri!

by **Lord Dominator** » Thu Aug 23, 2018 8:29 pm

I see no reason to not support

by **Cosmopolitan borovan** » Thu Aug 23, 2018 10:25 pm

by **Armaros** » Thu Aug 23, 2018 11:11 pm

Are you sure you want to mention KR in the proposal and not replace it by "hostile forces" or something like that?

That being said, I fully support this.

by **Kuriko** » Fri Aug 24, 2018 5:16 am

Armaros wrote:Are you sure you want to mention KR in the proposal and not replace it by "hostile forces" or something like that?

That being said, I fully support this.

They were mentioned in the original proposal, so its proper etiquette to mention them in the repeal. The repeal, after all, is supposed to adress the contents of the original proposal. If its good enough, I think ill submit it to head off the possibility of the current commendation draft proposal from reaching vote any time soon.

Edit: I would also like to apologize to Tinhampton about what happened in May. I was a complete ass and I shouldn't have been, so I'm sorry Tinhampton!

by **Imperium Anglorum** » Fri Aug 24, 2018 9:19 am

Lord Dominator wrote:I see no reason to not support

Basically this, arising from the question of a liberation for a region with a founder.

by **Armaros** » Fri Aug 24, 2018 9:20 am

The region is refounded. it didn't have a founder at the time and was under occupation, hence the lib.

by **Lord Dominator** » Fri Aug 24, 2018 11:14 am

Armaros wrote:The region is refounded. it didn't have a founder at the time and was under occupation, hence the lib.

I'm pretty sure we're all aware

by **Armaros** » Fri Aug 24, 2018 11:33 am

Lord Dominator wrote:
Armaros wrote:The region is refounded. it didn't have a founder at the time and was under occupation, hence the lib.

I'm pretty sure we're all aware

Might have misinterpreted the guy above me's post, but I thought he was confused as to why a region with a founder was liberated.

by **Lord Dominator** » Fri Aug 24, 2018 11:34 am

Armaros wrote:
Lord Dominator wrote:I'm pretty sure we're all aware

Might have misinterpreted the guy above me's post, but I thought he was confused as to why a region with a founder was liberated.

I can't tell either way myself

by **Kurnugia** » Fri Aug 24, 2018 3:15 pm

I'd rather not give KR more exposure than needed.

by **Lord Dominator** » Fri Aug 24, 2018 3:33 pm

Kurnugia wrote:I'd rather not give KR more exposure than needed.

It's a single-word mention in a repeal of something that could arguably be considered a badge for them.
I think we can deal

by **Isvataan** » Sun Aug 26, 2018 5:09 am

Support

by **New Nationale Einheit** » Sun Aug 26, 2018 2:52 pm

Glad to know stability is active. Good luck going forward.

by **Kitsco** » Sun Aug 26, 2018 7:52 pm

As long as stability is a constant variable in the continued future of this region, I suppose that the I can speak on the behalf of my region and support this repeal.

Good luck for the region and it's future.

by **Lord Dominator** » Tue Aug 28, 2018 9:44 pm

Vote looks to be off to a good start

by **Marshite Ponies** » Tue Aug 28, 2018 10:34 pm

"The Republic supports this repeal, as it believes the original resolution has served its purpose. It is happy to hear of the current stability of the region."

by **Jar Wattinree** » Wed Aug 29, 2018 6:55 am

In support.

by **Jocospor** » Thu Aug 30, 2018 2:36 am

The Confederation can advise that it supports this proposal. This liberation serves no further purpose and should be overturned.

by **Democratic Empire of Romania** » Thu Aug 30, 2018 7:14 am

For. Obviously.

by **Cosmopolitan borovan** » Sat Sep 01, 2018 9:01 pm

Repeal liberate the communal confederacy was passed 13750 to 789

by **Tinhampton** » Sun Sep 02, 2018 4:30 am

Cosmopolitan borovan wrote:Repeal liberate the communal confederacy was passed 13750 to 789

Which, if my assumptions about SC#200 are correct, makes this the most popular resolution in SC history, or am I missing something here?

[PASSED] Repeal Liberate The Communal Confederacy

[PASSED] Repeal Liberate The Communal Confederacy

Who is online