Vienna Eliot wrote:We're now debating and voting on Zjuam's proposal. If it fails, then tomorrow we'll debate and vote on Kazarogkai's proposal. This is because the latter proposal contradicts Zjuam's, so we can't pass them both. But if anyone proposes something that doesn't contradict something that's been passed (or might be passed), then it will get debate and a vote.
Hopefully this makes sense. Let me know if you're at all confused by anything.
Mind you the charter I made is in effect a work in progress, it's meant to be a proposal for the potential structure of the charter rather than being anything in it's own right. Also is his proposal a proposal for a law or actually a proposal for what will become the charter of the city, if it's the former then I presume we are now in the process of actually trying to make a charter. In that case only the second part of my proposal specifically the one referring to how an executive should function, actually contradicts his own. As such they technically could be discussed at the same time with each of us debating the relate merits of are systems. That is how it was done in the constitutional convention at the very least.
Your the Op so I'm not making any demands upon you, only speaking my thoughts and making some suggestions.