SC Questions & Answers

by **Frisbeeteria** » Fri Jun 01, 2018 11:45 am

Meme Star wrote:How do I join "SC"

As a WA member, you are automatically a member of both Chambers.

by **Escade** » Sun Jun 24, 2018 8:08 pm

May I start a discussion thread in the SC about players who deserve commend\condemns and have not had proposals written about them yet? Asking for names and suggestions and such?

by **Jakker** » Sun Jun 24, 2018 8:22 pm

Escade wrote:May I start a discussion thread in the SC about players who deserve commend\condemns and have not had proposals written about them yet? Asking for names and suggestions and such?

Go for it! A few people have done that. Here's one from a few years ago: viewtopic.php?f=24&t=266971&hilit

by **Tupelope** » Sun Jun 24, 2018 8:40 pm

Jakker wrote:
Escade wrote:May I start a discussion thread in the SC about players who deserve commend\condemns and have not had proposals written about them yet? Asking for names and suggestions and such?

Go for it! A few people have done that. Here's one from a few years ago: viewtopic.php?f=24&t=266971&hilit

theres 1 literally on the 2nd page viewtopic.php?f=24&t=402817&start=200

by **Kand Sovi** » Fri Jul 20, 2018 4:20 pm

How do you liberate a nation who is also a member of the World Assembly?

by **Reploid Productions** » Fri Jul 20, 2018 4:53 pm

Kand Sovi wrote:How do you liberate a nation who is also a member of the World Assembly?

Liberations do not apply to nations, they apply to regions only.

by **Dinoium** » Sat Jul 21, 2018 12:59 pm

Are mentioning offsites and/or forums in a SC proposal allowed?

by **Lenlyvit** » Sat Jul 21, 2018 1:08 pm

Dinoium wrote:Are mentioning offsites and/or forums in a SC proposal allowed?

Its allowed as long as its not a reference to the technical aspect. Saying "forum" is legal, saying "offsite forum" however is not.

by **Dinoium** » Sat Jul 21, 2018 1:50 pm

Lenlyvit wrote:
Dinoium wrote:Are mentioning offsites and/or forums in a SC proposal allowed?

Its allowed as long as its not a reference to the technical aspect. Saying "forum" is legal, saying "offsite forum" however is not.

Ah alright, thanks

by **Dinoium** » Sun Jul 22, 2018 7:08 am

I got another question, in 4.1 of SC rules, how would you define real world, just the word, RL countries, or what happens in the Real World?

by **Lenlyvit** » Sun Jul 22, 2018 9:36 am

Dinoium wrote:I got another question, in 4.1 of SC rules, how would you define real world, just the word, RL countries, or what happens in the Real World?

That one is a bit trickier. You can't reference real world actions, so you can't commend/condemn for OOC behavior. You also can't reference real world legislation, governments, or organizations.

by **Kuwi** » Fri Aug 17, 2018 3:28 pm

Can we commend or condemn non WA nations?

by **Kuriko** » Fri Aug 17, 2018 4:03 pm

Kuwi wrote:Can we commend or condemn non WA nations?

Yes indeed!

by **Escade** » Sun Aug 19, 2018 12:23 am

If someone proposes a commendation, a very rough one and you were working on commending the same person with other co-authors (and have a much more solid draft) then:

Do you post your draft in that person's thread?

Or can you create a new thread?

by **Kuriko** » Sun Aug 19, 2018 5:49 am

Escade wrote:If someone proposes a commendation, a very rough one and you were working on commending the same person with other co-authors (and have a much more solid draft) then:

Do you post your draft in that person's thread?

Or can you create a new thread?

Create your own thread Escade. If you post your draft in another's drafting thread it could constitute thread jacking.

by **Ransium** » Sun Aug 19, 2018 6:18 am

Kuriko wrote:
Escade wrote:If someone proposes a commendation, a very rough one and you were working on commending the same person with other co-authors (and have a much more solid draft) then:

Do you post your draft in that person's thread?

Or can you create a new thread?

Create your own thread Escade. If you post your draft in another's drafting thread it could constitute thread jacking.

No. Post it in the same thread. Please leave moderation to the moderstors.

The better way would be to just get OP to post your version.

by **Kuriko** » Sun Aug 19, 2018 8:52 am

Ransium wrote:
Kuriko wrote:Create your own thread Escade. If you post your draft in another's drafting thread it could constitute thread jacking.

No. Post it in the same thread. Please leave moderation to the moderstors.

The better way would be to just get OP to post your version.

Why would it not be considered thread jacking to post a draft you wrote in someone else's draft thread Ransium? If you wrote a proposal, and created a draft thread, would you want someone else to jack your thread by posting their draft there?

by **Ransium** » Sun Aug 19, 2018 9:31 am

Oops, sorry, I totally misread the question. I thought Escade was asking if they were the co-author with OP. If they are not co-author you were right. Sorry.

by **Escade** » Mon Aug 20, 2018 12:47 pm

Thanks and sorry for the confusion! I mean if you were writing a proposal for the same player. I imagine if the one already written was comprehensive we might be expected to combine with them or add on to theirs. If on the other hand it was rough (or we have no idea who the OP is) then we might put up our own original draft.

by **Frisbeeteria** » Mon Aug 20, 2018 12:51 pm

Escade wrote:Thanks and sorry for the confusion! I mean if you were writing a proposal for the same player. I imagine if the one already written was comprehensive we might be expected to combine with them or add on to theirs. If on the other hand it was rough (or we have no idea who the OP is) then we might put up our own original draft.

That ... didn't reduce the confusion. At all.

by **Escade** » Mon Aug 20, 2018 8:46 pm

Ransium wrote:Oops, sorry, I totally misread the question. I thought Escade was asking if they were the co-author with OP. If they are not co-author you were right. Sorry.

Scenario 1

Basically two player groups want to write a proposal for a nation, "Yuno" ( <3)

Player A put up a draft that is very rough or incomplete.

Player B (or me in this situation) has no clue who Player A is and had been working on a more comprehensive draft with a set of co-authors. Therefore, may I post mine's separately or do I have to post it with Player A. That was the original question which was resolved.

Scenario 2

Basically two player groups want to write a proposal for a nation, "Yuno" (<3)

Player A put up a draft that is very comprehensive and detailed and seems to be gaining traction.

Player B also was working on a draft for the same player. In this case, in my mind it would make more sense to add relevant draft sections to the already well-written one. Maybe if there was enough content and they talked it with the OP, become a co-author. However, possibly I'm wrong about this. Anyway, my relevant question was resolved already.

by **Tigrexia** » Sat Sep 22, 2018 6:01 pm

Is it true the SC is biased, corrupt, and oppressive?

by **Atzcapotzalco** » Sat Sep 22, 2018 6:02 pm

Tigrexia wrote:Is it true the SC is biased, corrupt, and oppressive?

Can confirm is true

by **Tigrexia** » Sat Sep 22, 2018 6:03 pm

Atzcapotzalco wrote:
Tigrexia wrote:Is it true the SC is biased, corrupt, and oppressive?

Can confirm it true

I knew it. Typical.

by **Kuriko** » Sat Sep 22, 2018 6:38 pm

This thread is for SC related questions and answers, not the spam you are doing right now. Please stop spamming the thread.

SC Questions & Answers

My question on liberating

Who is online