Right Wing Discussion Thread XIII: Do the Right thing

by **Herskerstad** » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:43 am

The Right Wing Discussion Thread
Part XIII
Do the Right thing.

"No enemy bomber can reach the Ruhr, if one reaches the Ruhr, my name is not Goering. You may call me Meyer . " - Hermann Meyer

The cycle dynastic cycle continues. The RWDT has grown over the years as new figures come and old figures leave, guaranteeing that nothing really advances at great speed which is just the way we like it here. The thread features a colorful cast of people of different opinions. As we celebrate this most momentous occasion of continuing one of the most beloved pages on NS, we take a pause to reflect on just the high tier discourse we are bound to find. RWDT, where we tell others to go to hell in such a way they ask for directions. RWDT, a great melting pot of ideas, insight and occasional sanity. RWDT, where the east and the west unites in similar opinion. They want the resources and so does the other. Long live the RWDT, and as always, peace and weapon exports shall secure the world.

Welcome all to the Right-Wing Discussion Thread (RWDT), a place where we discuss all matters appertaining to the right wing-spirit. This is the eleventh instalment of the thread making it NS's most beloved and controversial spots to engage in deep discussions that will no doubt bring fourth the fruits of wisdom and change your life. We ask the users to go by a dual-principle of being lenient towards the topic, but also understanding if things really get too off-topic and if necessary correct themselves. In particular, be cautious not to have too extended theological debates if it has little to do with the sphere of right wing policies in general. We thank you for your understanding.

Suggestions for improvements, changes, or additions is as always welcome.

Relevant subjects for discussion include:

The politics, philosophies, and ideologies of the right.
Right-wing perspectives on economics and political economy.
News and history relevant to the political Right.
Right-wing responses to current events.
Right-wing perspectives on social and economic problems.
Political, social, cultural, and economic problems and their solutions according to the political Right.
The problems facing particular Right-wing movements or the political right in general, and how to resolve them.

Previous Iterations:
Part I
Part II
Part III
Part IV
Part V
Part VI
Part VII
Part VIII
Part IX
Part X
Part XI
Part XII
Poll History:

Reading Suggestions:
If you’re looking to read something relevant to right-wing politics, consider reading some of the texts below. If you think something’s missing from this list, please post a recommendation. If you think something should be removed, please explain why.

If you’re interested in discussing matters relating to the political left, we advice contacting Marches who runs a helicopter business and is sure to give you a birds-eye perspective on things.

by **Kubumba Tribe** » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:44 am

Oi, noice thread

by **Genivaria** » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:45 am

Albert Speer for Fuhrer! Wait what?

by **The East Marches II** » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:45 am

Fleet shill reporting in for new thread

by **Kubumba Tribe** » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:46 am

"What type of right-winger are you?"
This should be the poll

by **Genivaria** » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:47 am

Kubumba Tribe wrote:"What type of right-winger are you?"
This should be the poll

I'm only here for the Bantz.

by **The Parkus Empire** » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:48 am

I dunno if Locke could be considered right wing any more than Thomas Jefferson. Right-wing free-marketers tend to be quite a bit to the right of Locke, whether or not they know it (for example, they often reject social contract theory and his labor theory of ownership, and would probably be disgusted if they read his thoughts on marriage and divorce).

by **Fahran** » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:48 am

It’s everyone’s favorite Jewish agrarian and srat partisan of classy parties here, and I’m presently contemplating Martin Buber as a Jewish traditionalist.

by **Genivaria** » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:49 am

The Parkus Empire wrote:I dunno if Locke could be considered right wing any more than Thomas Jefferson. Right-wing free-marketers tend to be quite a bit to the right of Locke, whether or not they know it (for example, they often reject social contract theory and his labor theory of ownership, and would probably be disgusted if they read his thoughts on marriage and divorce).

Depends on what you consider centrist to be, 300 years ago all the Founding Fathers were radical kooks.

by **Genivaria** » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:49 am

Fahran wrote:It’s everyone’s favorite Jewish agrarian and srat partisan of classy parties here, and I’m presently contemplating Martin Buber as a Jewish traditionalist.

Agarianism ew.

by **Dumb Ideologies** » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:50 am

Genivaria wrote:
Fahran wrote:It’s everyone’s favorite Jewish agrarian and srat partisan of classy parties here, and I’m presently contemplating Martin Buber as a Jewish traditionalist.

Agarianism ew.

Cities were a mistake.

by **Kubumba Tribe** » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:52 am

Fahran wrote:It’s everyone’s favorite Jewish agrarian and srat partisan of classy parties here, and I’m presently contemplating Martin Buber as a Jewish traditionalist.

I wish I still has that book about re-establishing Islam in Nigeria and not lost it...

by **The Parkus Empire** » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:52 am

Genivaria wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:I dunno if Locke could be considered right wing any more than Thomas Jefferson. Right-wing free-marketers tend to be quite a bit to the right of Locke, whether or not they know it (for example, they often reject social contract theory and his labor theory of ownership, and would probably be disgusted if they read his thoughts on marriage and divorce).

Depends on what you consider centrist to be, 300 years ago all the Founding Fathers were radical kooks.

That's really not true. Paine and Jefferson were (and still are). Many were not, though.

by **Genivaria** » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:52 am

Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Genivaria wrote:Agarianism ew.

Cities were a mistake.

We need to build taller. Vertical farms, vertical factories, make everything vertical!

by **The Parkus Empire** » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:53 am

Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Genivaria wrote:Agarianism ew.

Cities were a mistake.

I thought you loved London? :^)

by **The East Marches II** » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:53 am

Genivaria wrote:Albert Speer for Fuhrer! Wait what?

Not a bad choice, I like his architecture and he realized you shouldn't murder your own workforce. I can get behind this.

by **Dumb Ideologies** » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:54 am

The Parkus Empire wrote:
Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Cities were a mistake.

I thought you loved London? :^)

I'm sorry I can't hear you over the sound of all this demolition equipment.

by **Herskerstad** » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:54 am

The East Marches II wrote:
Genivaria wrote:Albert Speer for Fuhrer! Wait what?

Not a bad choice, I like his architecture and he realized you shouldn't murder your own workforce. I can get behind this.

One of the better pragmatists . . . when he was not spending ruinous amounts of resources building monuments instead of factories for the planned wars.

by **Genivaria** » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:55 am

The East Marches II wrote:
Genivaria wrote:Albert Speer for Fuhrer! Wait what?

Not a bad choice, I like his architecture and he realized you shouldn't murder your own workforce. I can get behind this.

"Alright so we're going to put dissidents into camps to make them work."
"Yes good! That way we can rehabilitate them for the stat-"
"And then we will kill them."
".....whyyyyyy?"

by **The Parkus Empire** » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:55 am

Dumb Ideologies wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote: I thought you loved London? :^)

I'm sorry I can't hear you over the sound of all this demolition equipment.

Bane?

by **The East Marches II** » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:57 am

Herskerstad wrote:
The East Marches II wrote:
Not a bad choice, I like his architecture and he realized you shouldn't murder your own workforce. I can get behind this.

One of the better pragmatists . . . when he was not spending ruinous amounts of resources building monuments instead of factories for the planned wars.

>Having authority over military production as an architect

by **The Parkus Empire** » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:57 am

Herskerstad wrote:
The East Marches II wrote:
Not a bad choice, I like his architecture and he realized you shouldn't murder your own workforce. I can get behind this.

One of the better pragmatists . . . when he was not spending ruinous amounts of resources building monuments instead of factories for the planned wars.

He had the long term consideration and knew fascism would only survive and be followed by future generations if they cherished its A E S T H E T I C S. Hitler may die, but aesthetics live on.

by **The East Marches II** » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:59 am

The Parkus Empire wrote:
Herskerstad wrote:
One of the better pragmatists . . . when he was not spending ruinous amounts of resources building monuments instead of factories for the planned wars.

He had the long term consideration and knew fascism would only survive and be followed by future generations if they cherished its A E S T H E T I C S. Hitler may die, but aesthetics live on.

tbh they were pretty good designs. I don't know what the fuck they doing these days when the choice is comblock or visual steel, concrete and glass abortions.

by **Genivaria** » Mon Jul 09, 2018 11:02 am

The East Marches II wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:He had the long term consideration and knew fascism would only survive and be followed by future generations if they cherished its A E S T H E T I C S. Hitler may die, but aesthetics live on.

tbh they were pretty good designs. I don't know what the fuck they doing these days when the choice is comblock or visual steel, concrete and glass abortions.

Planning to name your city "World Capital Germania" is pretty ballsy, go big or go home.

by **The Parkus Empire** » Mon Jul 09, 2018 11:06 am

The East Marches II wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:He had the long term consideration and knew fascism would only survive and be followed by future generations if they cherished its A E S T H E T I C S. Hitler may die, but aesthetics live on.

tbh they were pretty good designs. I don't know what the fuck they doing these days when the choice is comblock or visual steel, concrete and glass abortions.

Reflection of materialist values. Nominalism is opposed to quality, only fungible quantitative distinction (right down to people) is permissible. Such a mindset produces architecture that only emphasizes bigliness and hardness. Grandeur and grace are qualities, floors and utility are quantifiable.

Right Wing Discussion Thread XIII: Do the Right thing

Which Japanese Shogunate was the most glorious?

Right Wing Discussion Thread XIII: Do the Right thing

Who is online