Ahnuld posing as an East German ex athlete was meta funny though.
Advertisement
by Petrasylvania » Tue Jun 12, 2018 12:46 pm
by The Xenopolis Confederation » Tue Jun 12, 2018 6:06 pm
by Costa Fierro » Tue Jun 12, 2018 6:51 pm
by Islands of Washington » Tue Jun 12, 2018 6:59 pm
by UniversalCommons » Tue Jun 12, 2018 7:00 pm
by Great Winminster » Tue Jun 12, 2018 7:02 pm
by Costa Fierro » Tue Jun 12, 2018 7:02 pm
UniversalCommons wrote:This is funny. Why can't they produce "erotica" instead. What would be the difference between feminist porn and erotica...
by Liriena » Tue Jun 12, 2018 8:53 pm
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by The Empire of Pretantia » Tue Jun 12, 2018 10:33 pm
by The Empire of Pretantia » Tue Jun 12, 2018 10:38 pm
by Conserative Morality » Tue Jun 12, 2018 10:40 pm
by The Empire of Pretantia » Tue Jun 12, 2018 10:43 pm
by Greater Independent Colorado » Tue Jun 12, 2018 10:47 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:the duluth model is the most common form of DV intervention in the united states and treats male victims like perpetrators.
Ostroeuropa wrote:The violations of due process in the UK and US over rape accusations are a violation of mens human rights and have occured in the justice system and dozens of universities respectively.
Ostroeuropa wrote:(Alison saunders, head of the UK justice system, has been pushing this agenda for feminist reasons.)
Ostroeuropa wrote:Speaking of the UK justice system, it uses explicit feminist rationales to recommend women receive less prison time for the same crime than men, introduced after feminist revisions to the judges handbook.
by The Xenopolis Confederation » Tue Jun 12, 2018 11:33 pm
Greater Independent Colorado wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:the duluth model is the most common form of DV intervention in the united states and treats male victims like perpetrators.
The Duluth model is also criticized by many feminists, because it reinforces toxic masculinity by assuming that only men are capable of abusive acts.Ostroeuropa wrote:The violations of due process in the UK and US over rape accusations are a violation of mens human rights and have occured in the justice system and dozens of universities respectively.
[citation needed]Ostroeuropa wrote:(Alison saunders, head of the UK justice system, has been pushing this agenda for feminist reasons.)
[citation needed]Ostroeuropa wrote:Speaking of the UK justice system, it uses explicit feminist rationales to recommend women receive less prison time for the same crime than men, introduced after feminist revisions to the judges handbook.
After doing some digging, I believe that I have found what you are referring to here, and the handbook provides ample justification for this decision, with sources cited. Here's a link, the section in question is the sixth section of the handbook, and is entitled "gender."
by Greater Independent Colorado » Tue Jun 12, 2018 11:59 pm
The Xenopolis Confederation wrote:The only "toxic masculinity" it enforces is the feminist idea that all masculinity is toxic.
The Xenopolis Confederation wrote:Holy shit, that book is repulsive! Do they hand that out in the UK legal system now? It reeks of gynocentric (a word I normally don't use, but it applies here) drivel. Its justifications are extremely thin, even going and basically saying "The punishments we give to men might not be just for women." Equality before the law is spinning in its grave. In its justification it frequently gives you one side of the data. It says "50% of women do this..." or "the main causes for women are this..." without doing the same for men, meaning there's no reference point and it's completely useless.
by Costa Fierro » Wed Jun 13, 2018 12:14 am
by The Xenopolis Confederation » Wed Jun 13, 2018 12:31 am
Greater Independent Colorado wrote:The Xenopolis Confederation wrote:The only "toxic masculinity" it enforces is the feminist idea that all masculinity is toxic.
You do realize that I was criticizing the Duluth model, right?The Xenopolis Confederation wrote:Holy shit, that book is repulsive! Do they hand that out in the UK legal system now? It reeks of gynocentric (a word I normally don't use, but it applies here) drivel. Its justifications are extremely thin, even going and basically saying "The punishments we give to men might not be just for women." Equality before the law is spinning in its grave. In its justification it frequently gives you one side of the data. It says "50% of women do this..." or "the main causes for women are this..." without doing the same for men, meaning there's no reference point and it's completely useless.
As far as I can tell, most, but not all, of the data cited in the article does give both sides of the information. The solutions presented are nonetheless band-aid solutions at best, and fail to address the systemic inequality which they stem from, and the vagueness and lack of specifics presented is absolutely a valid criticism. But, it doesn't simply say, "Men are evil," as Ostroeuropa was implying.
by Hirota » Wed Jun 13, 2018 1:26 am
Easy. Failures of disclosure to the defence are failures in due process. Bear in mind, that's 47 in 2 months - just under 300 a year. It didn't look at previous convictions, so all of a sudden we are looking at a few thousand violations of due process over the course of under 10 years.
Harder to demonstrate "feminist reasons", but easy to demonstrate an agenda.Ostroeuropa wrote:(Alison saunders, head of the UK justice system, has been pushing this agenda for feminist reasons.)
[citation needed]
This isn't the rhetoric of someone allowing due process. This is the rhetoric someone who is looking for results, which contradicts the principles of a fair trial where the people who determine the result are the jury, not the prosecution, and certainly not the head of the prosecution."Over the last year we have worked hard to increase the volume of rape cases referred by the police and charged by prosecutors and our latest figures are certainly encouraging," she said.
"But even though there have been slightly more defendants convicted, the steady increase in conviction rates we have seen in recent years has halted, and this must be addressed immediately.
by West Leas Oros » Wed Jun 13, 2018 1:37 am
The Xenopolis Confederation wrote:Oros, no. Please. You were the chosen one. You were meant to debunk the tankies, not join them. Bring balance to the left, not leave it in darkness.
WLO Public News: Protest turns violent as Orosian Anarchists burn building. 2 found dead, 8 injured. Investigation continues.
by Ostroeuropa » Wed Jun 13, 2018 4:16 am
Greater Independent Colorado wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:the duluth model is the most common form of DV intervention in the united states and treats male victims like perpetrators.
The Duluth model is also criticized by many feminists, because it reinforces toxic masculinity by assuming that only men are capable of abusive acts.Ostroeuropa wrote:The violations of due process in the UK and US over rape accusations are a violation of mens human rights and have occured in the justice system and dozens of universities respectively.
[citation needed]Ostroeuropa wrote:(Alison saunders, head of the UK justice system, has been pushing this agenda for feminist reasons.)
[citation needed]Ostroeuropa wrote:Speaking of the UK justice system, it uses explicit feminist rationales to recommend women receive less prison time for the same crime than men, introduced after feminist revisions to the judges handbook.
After doing some digging, I believe that I have found what you are referring to here, and the handbook provides ample justification for this decision, with sources cited. Here's a link, the section in question is the sixth section of the handbook, and is entitled "gender."
You start out in 1954 by saying, "Nigger, nigger, nigger." By 1968 you can't say "nigger" — that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me — because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "Nigger, nigger."
by Islands of Washington » Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:01 am
West Leas Oros wrote:For a moment I legit thought East Germany was about to make a comeback. Instead I got D I S S A P O I N T M E N T
by Liriena » Wed Jun 13, 2018 8:21 am
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Liriena » Wed Jun 13, 2018 8:22 am
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Ancientania, Ethel mermania, Hidrandia, Keltionialang, Kreushia, Likhinia, Plan Neonie, Talibanada, Taosun, The Vooperian Union, Trump Almighty
Advertisement