Vassenor wrote:So Dinesh D’Souza is getting formally pardoned.
The Law and Order President, everybody.
What is D'Souza doing for Trump to be so rewarded?
Advertisement
by Ifreann » Thu May 31, 2018 6:51 am
Vassenor wrote:So Dinesh D’Souza is getting formally pardoned.
The Law and Order President, everybody.
by Petrasylvania » Thu May 31, 2018 6:57 am
Ifreann wrote:Vassenor wrote:So Dinesh D’Souza is getting formally pardoned.
The Law and Order President, everybody.
What is D'Souza doing for Trump to be so rewarded?
D'Souza pleaded guilty in 2014 to reimbursing two of his associates after directing them to contribute $10,000 each to the 2012 Senate campaign of Wendy Long. He also admitted that he knew what he was doing violated the law.
by Vassenor » Thu May 31, 2018 7:41 am
by Ifreann » Thu May 31, 2018 7:52 am
Vassenor wrote:U.S. hits EU, Canada and Mexico with steel, aluminum tariffs
So I'm pretty sure this a Very Bad Idea™, but apparently the government is pushing forward with it anyway.
by The East Marches II » Thu May 31, 2018 8:12 am
Vassenor wrote:U.S. hits EU, Canada and Mexico with steel, aluminum tariffs
So I'm pretty sure this a Very Bad Idea™, but apparently the government is pushing forward with it anyway.
by Cannot think of a name » Thu May 31, 2018 8:28 am
Saiwania wrote:Vassenor wrote:It would be interesting to see what the people shrieking about how Roseanne's firing is a suppression of free speech think about the NFL's new anthem rules.
ABC made the wrong decision in cancelling Roseanne if it still had high ratings and presumably was still profitable. Every TV station is about ratings and money in the end. There were plenty of options short of cancelling the show immediately, if they just didn't want to work with Roseanne Barr anymore. They could've killed her character off and continued it without her, or wrapped that season up. They could've brought in someone else named Roseanne. They could've renamed the show or gradually changed it to something else. Shame that because of one person misbehaving in their free time, 400+ other people or so, are out of work.
People wanting to hire her, should've known that Roseanne Barr has had an unstable personality ever since surviving a car wreck (allegedly).
by Internationalist Bastard » Thu May 31, 2018 8:31 am
Vassenor wrote:So Dinesh D’Souza is getting formally pardoned.
The Law and Order President, everybody.
by Tobleste » Thu May 31, 2018 8:38 am
Vassenor wrote:It would be interesting to see what the people shrieking about how Roseanne's firing is a suppression of free speech think about the NFL's new anthem rules.
by Ifreann » Thu May 31, 2018 8:39 am
Internationalist Bastard wrote:Vassenor wrote:So Dinesh D’Souza is getting formally pardoned.
The Law and Order President, everybody.
Didn’t he plead guilty? Like literally he admitted he did it?
by Vassenor » Thu May 31, 2018 8:44 am
by Vassenor » Thu May 31, 2018 8:51 am
by Proctopeo » Thu May 31, 2018 8:51 am
Vassenor wrote:U.S. hits EU, Canada and Mexico with steel, aluminum tariffs
So I'm pretty sure this a Very Bad Idea™, but apparently the government is pushing forward with it anyway.
by Vassenor » Thu May 31, 2018 8:51 am
Proctopeo wrote:Vassenor wrote:U.S. hits EU, Canada and Mexico with steel, aluminum tariffs
So I'm pretty sure this a Very Bad Idea™, but apparently the government is pushing forward with it anyway.
They deserve it over the new shit they're trying to pull with the internet tbqh
by Freezic Vast » Thu May 31, 2018 8:54 am
by Ifreann » Thu May 31, 2018 8:54 am
Proctopeo wrote:Vassenor wrote:U.S. hits EU, Canada and Mexico with steel, aluminum tariffs
So I'm pretty sure this a Very Bad Idea™, but apparently the government is pushing forward with it anyway.
They deserve it over the new shit they're trying to pull with the internet tbqh
by Proctopeo » Thu May 31, 2018 8:56 am
by Telconi » Thu May 31, 2018 8:59 am
Tobleste wrote:Vassenor wrote:It would be interesting to see what the people shrieking about how Roseanne's firing is a suppression of free speech think about the NFL's new anthem rules.
Well the anthem rules are primarily designed to suppress protests about racism and that's not the "free speech" they're concerned with.
by Internationalist Bastard » Thu May 31, 2018 9:04 am
by Telconi » Thu May 31, 2018 9:11 am
by Internationalist Bastard » Thu May 31, 2018 9:12 am
by Telconi » Thu May 31, 2018 9:15 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cyptopir, Dauchh Palki, Google [Bot], Statesburg, Zurkerx
Advertisement