West Leas Oros wrote:RiderSyl wrote:
It's not corrupt, of course it's tyranny by majority, most of NS is left-wing, "SJW" means nothing anymore, the SC is far from an echo chamber, the SC isn't fighting you by voting down this garbage, and leave England out of this.
1. While not corrupt, several extremist communists have been currying favor in the WA
2. I have no problem with leftists on NS, but a certain group called the NS Left, a coalition of terrorists.
3. SJW may be misused, but their overall ideals are similar to those championed by the NS Left
4. Actually, no. The SC shows a clear bias. La Nav’s Neoliberation debacle proves the SC is politically charged.
5. True, but what does it say when regions with unpopular opinions are liberated on ideological grounds? How is this different? It’s not even a liberation, but we can apparently only condemn ideologies you disagree.
1: All people of all ideologies try to get the WA to align with them, in the Security Council especially. There is nothing abnormal or wrong about it, and this proposal is certainly an attempt by Fascists to do that.
2: Personal opinion, and not relevant to this thread.
3: Irrelevant.
4: Of course it is politically charged, it's meant to be, but the difference is only between those who succeed and those who fail. For now at least, the Security Council has inclined to favour groups like TRF and their goals as opposed to groups like The Iron Fortress. I happen to think that's the right course, but others can and do disagree and try to change it.
5: Condemnations are meant to be for regions that do things the SC might condemnable, not mere ideological grounds. TCB's condemnation attempt is quite explicitly motivated purely by ideology. Liberate KR and Nazi Europa at least had grounds that could be clearly articulated by their proponents, and evidence to support those positions, neither of which exists here. I opposed the 'Condemn Iron Fortress' proposal recently drawn up because I don't think they're important enough to be worth it (irritating though they are in wasting the Council's time with this joke of a proposal). Usually pure ideology alone is not good grounds for a Condemnation, and this useless garbage of a Resolution is a particularly grotesque example of what happens when it gets into Quorum.
Members of 
