Advertisement
by East Gondwana » Sat Apr 21, 2018 8:29 am
by Cute Puppies » Sat Apr 21, 2018 8:11 pm
East Gondwana wrote:"The final phrase of Clause 4, "whether it be laissez-faire capitalism or communism." seems to suggest that they are the only permissible or existing economic systems; I would recommend removing this phrase as it is irrelevant to the rest of the clause."
by Kenmoria » Sun Apr 22, 2018 11:45 pm
by Cute Puppies » Mon Apr 23, 2018 6:18 pm
Kenmoria wrote:"I would recommend thinking of a different title. This proposal wouldn't be a bill once it is passed, it would be an act or a convention or something similar. Also, “replacement” doesn't sit well with me."
by Kenmoria » Mon Apr 23, 2018 11:31 pm
by Imperium Anglorum » Tue Apr 24, 2018 5:48 am
by Cute Puppies » Tue Apr 24, 2018 2:28 pm
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Section 2 is unacceptable.
by Imperium Anglorum » Tue Apr 24, 2018 4:56 pm
Cute Puppies wrote:Why and how can section 2 be improved?
by Cute Puppies » Thu Apr 26, 2018 9:05 am
by Kenmoria » Thu Apr 26, 2018 9:06 am
by Cute Puppies » Thu Apr 26, 2018 1:35 pm
by Imperium Anglorum » Thu Apr 26, 2018 5:29 pm
by Cute Puppies » Thu Apr 26, 2018 5:39 pm
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Well, you didn't. I won't vote for a replacement for NEF that does not block blockers like NEF and the one you have proposed here.
by Aclion » Thu Apr 26, 2018 11:32 pm
by Kenmoria » Thu Apr 26, 2018 11:43 pm
by Auralia » Fri Apr 27, 2018 12:50 pm
by Cute Puppies » Fri Apr 27, 2018 6:08 pm
by Imperium Anglorum » Fri Apr 27, 2018 8:35 pm
by Cute Puppies » Sat Apr 28, 2018 7:21 am
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Didn't recognise Auralia for a second there. I guess he's now a French Communist. But I will oppose any legislation which includes a blocker for future economic legislation. I will also oppose any replacement which does not reserve to the World Assembly the power to create, at its will, future regulations on the economy.
by Cute Puppies » Sat Apr 28, 2018 8:48 am
by Cute Puppies » Sat Apr 28, 2018 11:37 am
by Kenmoria » Mon Apr 30, 2018 11:35 pm
by Bears Armed » Mon May 07, 2018 6:19 am
by Imperium Anglorum » Mon May 07, 2018 6:14 pm
Bears Armed wrote:OOC Repeals "urging" new legislation have tended to get declared illegal because that was itself counted as an operative clause. "Hoping for" the replacement is more acceptable.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Second Sovereignty
Advertisement