Cek, comments on this?
As for violent revolution, possibly, however, i'd point this out.
Violent revolution requires organization, resources, etc. That means institutions, clubs, groups. That organizational structure should be pushed as far as it can go, as many resources as it can gather accumulated under it, right up until we hit the Kennedy situation.
"Those who don't allow peaceful change, ensure violent change."
When the system unfairly resists further capture of institutions, clubs, groups, resources, that is the time for violence to erupt.
If they never unfairly resist and engage with us as good faith actors, peaceful reform will be possible.
Your belief that violent revolt will be necessary is essentially a lack of faith in them, possibly justified. But it might not be necessary. That should be emphasized not only for ethical reasons, but for strategic ones.