The Sarian wrote:[REDACTED BY MOD]
Kamchastkia wrote:[REDACTED BY MOD]
Given their history of discussing this topic, and their use of it to harass me, it's clear what both of them are suggesting.
by Vienna Eliot » Sat Feb 17, 2018 4:53 pm
The Sarian wrote:[REDACTED BY MOD]
Kamchastkia wrote:[REDACTED BY MOD]
by Vienna Eliot » Sat Feb 17, 2018 10:50 pm
Soviet Canuckistan wrote:REDACTED BY MOD
Lamaredia wrote:REDACTED BY MOD
by Soviet Canuckistan » Sat Feb 17, 2018 11:01 pm
by Wysten » Sat Feb 17, 2018 11:07 pm
by Vienna Eliot » Sat Feb 17, 2018 11:07 pm
Soviet Canuckistan wrote:In my defence, I have not previously acted to antagonize NWO/Vienna Eliot in any way so I don't really see how my actions constitute harassment considering this is an isolated post of mine, in my long history as a member of the Senate (around 5 years). Other players and I are just asking for the right to police our RP like any other and to restrict membership to the RP like any other RP is able to do. I'm trying to do this through the framework of the RP where resolutions pertaining the the RP such as nation formation are handled through a system of resolutions and seconds. This entire situation is obviously causing discord in our community and this is the way I, and some other players, believe that it should be handled.
by Kyrusia » Sun Feb 18, 2018 12:33 am
Wysten wrote:https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=429986&p=33489532#p33489532
Another one for the post above.
by The Sarian » Sun Feb 18, 2018 6:22 am
Vienna Eliot wrote:Soviet Canuckistan wrote:In my defence, I have not previously acted to antagonize NWO/Vienna Eliot in any way so I don't really see how my actions constitute harassment considering this is an isolated post of mine, in my long history as a member of the Senate (around 5 years). Other players and I are just asking for the right to police our RP like any other and to restrict membership to the RP like any other RP is able to do. I'm trying to do this through the framework of the RP where resolutions pertaining the the RP such as nation formation are handled through a system of resolutions and seconds. This entire situation is obviously causing discord in our community and this is the way I, and some other players, believe that it should be handled.
I am not reporting the resolution. I am reporting the claim that I doxxed someone.
by Farnhamia » Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:12 am
The Sarian wrote:Vienna Eliot wrote:I am not reporting the resolution. I am reporting the claim that I doxxed someone.
Which you did.
If you were just remorseful and willing to be a constructive part of the RP 90% of people (including myself, Ainin, SovCan and countless others who you say are "harassing" you) would have moved on. You keep claiming this is some co-ordinated effort to chase you out the RP but many of the people you've reported, including myself, were vocal supporters of you rejoining based on the belief that you had accepted your actions were terrible and become a better person for it. Stop lying, stop using the mods as weapons to get away from your action and learn something from the whole situation. Then 90% of people wouldn't have a problem.
by Vienna Eliot » Tue Feb 20, 2018 8:10 pm
The Sarian wrote:[REDACTED BY MOD]
by Vienna Eliot » Wed Feb 21, 2018 2:32 pm
House of Judah wrote:[REDACTED BY MOD]
by House of Judah » Wed Feb 21, 2018 2:44 pm
by Kyrusia » Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:13 pm
House of Judah wrote:I've edited the potentially offending post and hope this doesn't become a greater issue.
by MERIZoC » Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:19 pm
Kyrusia wrote:House of Judah wrote:I've edited the potentially offending post and hope this doesn't become a greater issue.
Next time, don't make accusations. Period. At the moment, you're not getting anything official or unofficial on your record, since it appears this was simply an error that you promptly corrected. Next time, it'll be something official. We've had to drop in on the NSG Senate threads to the point that there is absolutely no excuse to not be aware of the rule regarding harassment.
The NSG Senate threads, any thread on the forum, RMB, and TGs are not the places to field accusations. If you have evidence which makes you believe a player is a thread to NS or other players, file a GHR. If you don't like the way an OP is behaving in a thread, leave the thread.
by Kyrusia » Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:24 pm
MERIZoC wrote:Kyrusia wrote:Next time, don't make accusations. Period. At the moment, you're not getting anything official or unofficial on your record, since it appears this was simply an error that you promptly corrected. Next time, it'll be something official. We've had to drop in on the NSG Senate threads to the point that there is absolutely no excuse to not be aware of the rule regarding harassment.
The NSG Senate threads, any thread on the forum, RMB, and TGs are not the places to field accusations. If you have evidence which makes you believe a player is a thread to NS or other players, file a GHR. If you don't like the way an OP is behaving in a thread, leave the thread.
The post still implies it, saying "an act for which I believe he should have been banned from the RP involving Freyhil", as do other posts in the thread. Even if he tiptoes around it, is heavy implication not actionable? I'm frankly in no mood to be slandered, whether it be explicitly or implicitly.
by NERVUN » Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:54 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement