Advertisement
by Slavonia and Srijem » Sun Jan 07, 2018 8:32 am
by Imperial Polk County » Mon Jan 08, 2018 3:57 am
by Liagolas » Mon Jan 08, 2018 7:50 am
Slavonia and Srijem wrote:Considering how many non-member nations which outnumber member nationes, destroy Ozone Layer, i doubt this will take so much effect on Ozone. WA keeps destroying it's industries, while more agressive non-members are getting richer and richer because they don't have obligation to follow any enviromental laws.
by Bears Armed » Mon Jan 08, 2018 10:57 am
Slavonia and Srijem wrote:Considering how many non-member nations which outnumber member nationes, destroy Ozone Layer, i doubt this will take so much effect on Ozone. WA keeps destroying it's industries, while more agressive non-members are getting richer and richer because they don't have obligation to follow any enviromental laws.
Wishing to prevent such damage to the protective Ozone, acknowledging this as a potential problem of international scope, and hoping that concerted action on the matter by this organisation’s members not only will be useful in itself but also will encourage non-member nations to take similar action as well;
*<snip>*
5). Urges member nations to do what they can, without increasing the risk of international conflict, to persuade non-member nations to cooperate with ACE as well.
by Rvssyav » Mon Jan 08, 2018 7:32 pm
by Bears Armed » Tue Jan 09, 2018 10:47 am
Rvssyav wrote:“Undoubtedly voting in favor, although it will mean our Republic will undergo a major overhaul of our laissez-faire policies. I have only one suggestion” clears throat. “Sorry about that... anyways, can we be guaranteed that there will be an impartial body at the ACE. Our Republic is concerned of the enormous amounts of power already concentrated at high levels by nations of leftist, liberal and socialist ideologies, and very minor representation for nations like, ourselves, of capitalist ideologies. We are concerned that there will be extreme environmentalist approaches by the ACE, which may undermine some of our core policies. Our Parliament, to include the socialists within, is drafting WA withdrawal legislation, if at any time we are to be expected to destroy our own competitiveness for the sake of anybody else’s pleasure. However, we do reassure our commitment to comply with this resolution in all manners possible.”
by Slavonia and Srijem » Tue Jan 09, 2018 10:58 am
Bears Armed wrote:Slavonia and Srijem wrote:Considering how many non-member nations which outnumber member nationes, destroy Ozone Layer, i doubt this will take so much effect on Ozone. WA keeps destroying it's industries, while more agressive non-members are getting richer and richer because they don't have obligation to follow any enviromental laws.
Well...Wishing to prevent such damage to the protective Ozone, acknowledging this as a potential problem of international scope, and hoping that concerted action on the matter by this organisation’s members not only will be useful in itself but also will encourage non-member nations to take similar action as well;
*<snip>*
5). Urges member nations to do what they can, without increasing the risk of international conflict, to persuade non-member nations to cooperate with ACE as well.
by Sierra Lyricalia » Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:56 am
Slavonia and Srijem wrote:Bears Armed wrote:Well...Wishing to prevent such damage to the protective Ozone, acknowledging this as a potential problem of international scope, and hoping that concerted action on the matter by this organisation’s members not only will be useful in itself but also will encourage non-member nations to take similar action as well;
*<snip>*
5). Urges member nations to do what they can, without increasing the risk of international conflict, to persuade non-member nations to cooperate with ACE as well.
But they mostly won't cooperate with ACE, because they don't care- That clause is empty plead.
by Liagolas » Tue Jan 09, 2018 7:04 pm
Slavonia and Srijem wrote:But they mostly won't cooperate with ACE, because they don't care- That clause is empty plead.
by Bears Armed » Wed Jan 10, 2018 11:43 am
by Aclion » Wed Jan 10, 2018 11:48 am
Bears Armed wrote:OOC
It might be worth pointing out that in RL, once the treaty had been drafted, it was ratified & kept by everybody: Developed nations & developing ones; capitalists and communists; the USA, the USSR, the PRC... which is an encouraging precedent.
by Imperium Anglorum » Wed Jan 10, 2018 8:13 pm
by Jabberwocky » Wed Jan 10, 2018 9:43 pm
by Han Ful » Thu Jan 11, 2018 10:38 am
by Bears Armed Mission » Thu Jan 11, 2018 10:44 am
Jabberwocky wrote:In the event that my Nation already has a stunning environment, and that we already have a terrific environmental program, are we then expected to take even more stringent measures to protect the ozone layer (which, in our case is not depleted)?
by Scherzinger » Thu Jan 11, 2018 12:54 pm
by Fauxia » Thu Jan 11, 2018 1:42 pm
by Kenmoria » Thu Jan 11, 2018 1:57 pm
by Hatterleigh » Thu Jan 11, 2018 1:58 pm
National News Network: William Botrum entering last days in office - President-elect Rood preparing or term
Overview of Hatterleigh | William Botrum, Hatterleigh's President | Hatterlese Embassy Program | I don't use NS stats.by Willania Imperium » Thu Jan 11, 2018 2:55 pm
Scherzinger wrote:If it means we have to give up part of our industry, which is crucial to my economy, then i will be going against this proposal a second time. Besides, global warming isnt real in the sense that many have used politically. What these filthy democratic flat-nosed individuals are doing is exaggerating a scientifically proven ordeal. The Earth goes through a cycle of global warming and global cooling every millennium or so.
by States of Glory WA Office » Thu Jan 11, 2018 3:45 pm
by Wallenburg » Thu Jan 11, 2018 6:39 pm
Hatterleigh wrote:UV rays are YET ANOTHER myth made up by the radiation suit company. Don't be foolin me
by Princess Luna Gangleader of Boil Heights » Thu Jan 11, 2018 8:25 pm
by Azurius » Thu Jan 11, 2018 8:37 pm
Scherzinger wrote:If it means we have to give up part of our industry, which is crucial to my economy, then i will be going against this proposal a second time. Besides, global warming isnt real in the sense that many have used politically. What these filthy democratic flat-nosed individuals are doing is exaggerating a scientifically proven ordeal. The Earth goes through a cycle of global warming and global cooling every millennium or so.
by Bruke » Thu Jan 11, 2018 8:40 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot]
Advertisement