Fauxia wrote:Christian Democrats wrote:Resolution 132 protects the practice of conscripting conscientious objectors for non-combative military duties (about 80% of military roles). Together with Resolution 35, this exact same practice must be protected with regard to other individuals. Otherwise, there would be unlawful discrimination against conscientious objectors.
OOC: Is it possible I should open a challenge to see what the rest of GenSec says?
I suppose you could. In my view, a resolution against conscription could legislate, if at all, only on the matter of combat roles.