Europe and Oceania wrote:We oppose this.
Any reason why?
Advertisement
by Aclion » Thu Nov 02, 2017 12:56 pm
by Fauxia » Thu Nov 02, 2017 1:24 pm
Luckily, CWA’s written 32 and counting, that said, I believe only 5 are eligible for the commendation. I would love a commendation for CWA, but am not sure I will vote for this.Aclion wrote:I don't think authoring three issues is sufficient reason to commend someone.
by Frisbeeteria » Thu Nov 02, 2017 2:15 pm
Aclion wrote:I don't think authoring three issues is sufficient reason to commend someone.
by States of Glory » Thu Nov 02, 2017 3:59 pm
by Abhichandra » Thu Nov 02, 2017 9:06 pm
by Luna Amore » Thu Nov 02, 2017 11:02 pm
Frisbeeteria wrote:Aclion wrote:I don't think authoring three issues is sufficient reason to commend someone.
As opposed to raiding or roleplaying? There's a ton of work involved, probably more than most suspect ... and it impacts everyone in the game. It's absolutely worth a commendation.
It's a shame R1 won't let us recognize the work CWA has done as Senior Issues Editor, because that's been absolutely MASSIVE. There is an incredible amount behind-the-scenes stuff being done by them. Whether the SC recognizes them or not, I want it clearly understood that staff members are pretty much in awe of the work being done by the Issues team under CWA's leadership. Despite this proposal necessarily being limited to the 3 or 5 issues created before they joined the team, it's still worthy of SC recognition.
by Shwe Tu Colony » Thu Nov 02, 2017 11:46 pm
Talmovay wrote:Didn't read, but voted against. Celebrating others achievements while ive done nothing is unfair. We should be giving me an award.
by Wallenburg » Thu Nov 02, 2017 11:46 pm
by Wallenburg » Thu Nov 02, 2017 11:52 pm
by Drasnia » Thu Nov 02, 2017 11:59 pm
by Wallenburg » Fri Nov 03, 2017 12:02 am
Drasnia wrote:Wallenburg wrote:Correct. And before you cite "Commend Separatist Peoples", be aware that it commends SP for roleplay contributions extending well beyond WA legislation.
Well I fundamentally disagree with you. Yours is a very short-sighted view point. Issues and GA legislation have the most far-reaching effects of anything in the game. If anything, that should make them worth even more.
by Aclion » Fri Nov 03, 2017 8:18 am
Frisbeeteria wrote:Aclion wrote:I don't think authoring three issues is sufficient reason to commend someone.
As opposed to raiding or roleplaying? There's a ton of work involved, probably more than most suspect ... and it impacts everyone in the game. It's absolutely worth a commendation.
It's a shame R1 won't let us recognize the work CWA has done as Senior Issues Editor, because that's been absolutely MASSIVE. There is an incredible amount behind-the-scenes stuff being done by them. Whether the SC recognizes them or not, I want it clearly understood that staff members are pretty much in awe of the work being done by the Issues team under CWA's leadership. Despite this proposal necessarily being limited to the 3 or 5 issues created before they joined the team, it's still worthy of SC recognition.
by Helaw » Fri Nov 03, 2017 9:30 am
Aclion wrote:Frisbeeteria wrote:As opposed to raiding or roleplaying? There's a ton of work involved, probably more than most suspect ... and it impacts everyone in the game. It's absolutely worth a commendation.
It's a shame R1 won't let us recognize the work CWA has done as Senior Issues Editor, because that's been absolutely MASSIVE. There is an incredible amount behind-the-scenes stuff being done by them. Whether the SC recognizes them or not, I want it clearly understood that staff members are pretty much in awe of the work being done by the Issues team under CWA's leadership. Despite this proposal necessarily being limited to the 3 or 5 issues created before they joined the team, it's still worthy of SC recognition.
That's great, but that's it's not (and cannot be) in the proposal and thus cannot be used to judge the proposals merit. I'm not saying CWA isn't commendable(though I could make that argument) I'm saying what is presented in the proposal(you remember that? That's the thing we're actually voting on) is not commendable.
The whole point of disallowing mentions of staff activity was so that we wouldn't commend staff for being staff. But what's the point if we're just going to commend for it anyway?
Edit: annd it looks like CWA is against it as well. So I don't even have to feel bad about not commending him.
by Queer AnComville » Fri Nov 03, 2017 11:19 am
by Rude Admins » Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:42 pm
by Alusi » Fri Nov 03, 2017 2:50 pm
by Drasnia » Fri Nov 03, 2017 2:52 pm
Alusi wrote:Wait... I thought you couldn't Commend or Condemn a nation that wrote issues. Or maybe it was game moderators.
Eh whatever I support it.
by Candlewhisper Archive » Fri Nov 03, 2017 7:09 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement