by Petrolheadia » Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:24 am
by The Widening Gyre » Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:28 am
Petrolheadia wrote:I think it's good for fighting inequality, as the quality of children's education wouldn't depend on the parents' ability to pay for a house in an area with good schools in such a system.
by The Commonwealth of Tennessee » Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:28 am
by Petrolheadia » Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:30 am
The Widening Gyre wrote:Petrolheadia wrote:I think it's good for fighting inequality, as the quality of children's education wouldn't depend on the parents' ability to pay for a house in an area with good schools in such a system.
Instead it would hinge on their ability to pay for an expensive private school for a decade or more per child. Yay for fighting inequality!
by Sovaal » Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:32 am
by The Widening Gyre » Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:34 am
by Petrolheadia » Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:35 am
by Bengal and Assam » Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:38 am
by MERIZoC » Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:38 am
The debate for and against school choice is a well-known one. Some say that parents should have a right to choose a school for their children, others say that it's better to make every child from a certain district go to a certain school.
And what position do you have?
by Petrolheadia » Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:40 am
Bengal and Assam wrote:Every areas or districts should have atleasr 1 public school following a common syllabus set by the govt.This will reduce inequality and also,we should shut down private schools so that the rich kids don't get to live a 5star school life while others get the same stuff supplied by the state.
by Trumptonium » Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:40 am
MERIZoC wrote:The debate for and against school choice is a well-known one. Some say that parents should have a right to choose a school for their children, others say that it's better to make every child from a certain district go to a certain school.
And what position do you have?
Draw kids from all over and bus them to randomized schools. That way you don't have racial segregation and massive inequities between the districts in the city and the suburbs.
by Galloism » Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:44 am
by Geilinor » Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:51 am
by Geilinor » Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:53 am
MERIZoC wrote:The debate for and against school choice is a well-known one. Some say that parents should have a right to choose a school for their children, others say that it's better to make every child from a certain district go to a certain school.
And what position do you have?
Draw kids from all over and bus them to randomized schools. That way you don't have racial segregation and massive inequities between the districts in the city and the suburbs.
by Kenmoria » Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:55 am
MERIZoC wrote:The debate for and against school choice is a well-known one. Some say that parents should have a right to choose a school for their children, others say that it's better to make every child from a certain district go to a certain school.
And what position do you have?
Draw kids from all over and bus them to randomized schools. That way you don't have racial segregation and massive inequities between the districts in the city and the suburbs.
by Aellex » Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:01 am
MERIZoC wrote:Draw kids from all over and bus them to randomized schools. That way you don't have racial segregation and massive inequities between the districts in the city and the suburbs.
by Galloism » Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:02 am
Aellex wrote:MERIZoC wrote:Draw kids from all over and bus them to randomized schools. That way you don't have racial segregation and massive inequities between the districts in the city and the suburbs.
Seems pointlessly complicated and potentially retardedly annoying for the kids who actually have to sit through all the travelling time in bus.
As for my own opinion, I think school choice with some of the local ones being forced to accept you would be the best.
Or just area ones and more scholarship for private schools for smart kids would be the best.
by The Widening Gyre » Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:02 am
by Kenmoria » Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:06 am
by Aellex » Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:07 am
Galloism wrote:Holograms are going to render "going to school" a nonevent anyway.
by Galloism » Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:07 am
Kenmoria wrote:I doubt holograms will ever advance to the point where they can compete with a classroom full of students and teachers. Even if they could, the company making them wouldn't wish to spend the expense required to make this when the high price would mean most parents would opt for reality instead.
by Galloism » Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:08 am
by Great Nepal » Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:15 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, AJTON, Diarcesia, Eahland, Europa Undivided, Google [Bot], Ifreann, ImSaLiA, Ineva, Kerwa, Kostane, Majestic-12 [Bot], Maximum Imperium Rex, Shrillland, Soul Reapers, The Jamesian Republic, Washington Resistance Army, Welskerland
Advertisement