Anyone mind explaining UMN's logic to me? I still fail to see how Trump's better, and I'm pretty sure them explaining it wouldn't make any sense.
Advertisement
by New haven america » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:47 pm
by Yes Im Biop » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:47 pm
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...
Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.
Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
by Washington Resistance Army » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:47 pm
Valyrian Freeholds wrote:I see a possible loophole with the new emails that have arisen around Mr Trump Jr.
Could the Trump Administration claim that as the there is no such thing as the "Crown Prosecutor of Russia", they technically didn't deal with a foreign government?
by United Muscovite Nations » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:49 pm
New haven america wrote:United Muscovite Nations wrote:If he actually does one, then he will be as bad, because then he will have done what Clinton said she was going to do.
Anyone mind explaining UMN's logic to me? I still fail to see how Trump's better, and I'm pretty sure them explaining it wouldn't make any sense.
by The East Marches II » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:50 pm
New haven america wrote:United Muscovite Nations wrote:If he actually does one, then he will be as bad, because then he will have done what Clinton said she was going to do.
Anyone mind explaining UMN's logic to me? I still fail to see how Trump's better, and I'm pretty sure them explaining it wouldn't make any sense.
by Zanera » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:50 pm
Valyrian Freeholds wrote:I see a possible loophole with the new emails that have arisen around Mr Trump Jr.
Could the Trump Administration claim that as the there is no such thing as the "Crown Prosecutor of Russia", they technically didn't deal with a foreign government?
by Yes Im Biop » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:52 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Valyrian Freeholds wrote:I see a possible loophole with the new emails that have arisen around Mr Trump Jr.
Could the Trump Administration claim that as the there is no such thing as the "Crown Prosecutor of Russia", they technically didn't deal with a foreign government?
Probably, yeah.Yes Im Biop wrote:
I'll pick both and add in a sinking Nimitz as the opening salvo.
You evidently have much more faith in the truthfulness of China than I do.
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...
Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.
Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
by The East Marches II » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:52 pm
by Genivaria » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:52 pm
New haven america wrote:United Muscovite Nations wrote:If he actually does one, then he will be as bad, because then he will have done what Clinton said she was going to do.
Anyone mind explaining UMN's logic to me? I still fail to see how Trump's better, and I'm pretty sure them explaining it wouldn't make any sense.
by New haven america » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:52 pm
United Muscovite Nations wrote:New haven america wrote:Anyone mind explaining UMN's logic to me? I still fail to see how Trump's better, and I'm pretty sure them explaining it wouldn't make any sense.
I think it's pretty simple.
Hillary: Definitely going to have a no-fly zone over Syria
Trump: Might have one
by New haven america » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:53 pm
The East Marches II wrote:New haven america wrote:Anyone mind explaining UMN's logic to me? I still fail to see how Trump's better, and I'm pretty sure them explaining it wouldn't make any sense.
You should read it more carefully before making a post like that. He is equating them rather than saying one is better than the other, should Trump take that action.
by Washington Resistance Army » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:54 pm
New haven america wrote:United Muscovite Nations wrote:I think it's pretty simple.
Hillary: Definitely going to have a no-fly zone over Syria
Trump: Might have one
Hillary: Wants to preserve good social and economic policies created during the Obama Era, as well as keeping our environment safe.
Trump: Fuck that shit, let's sell our national parks tomymy son's business buddies!
by The East Marches II » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:54 pm
by United Muscovite Nations » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:55 pm
New haven america wrote:United Muscovite Nations wrote:I think it's pretty simple.
Hillary: Definitely going to have a no-fly zone over Syria
Trump: Might have one
Hillary: Wants to preserve good social and economic policies created during the Obama Era, as well as keeping our environment safe.
Trump: Fuck that shit, let's sell our national parks tomymy son's business buddies!
by Genivaria » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:56 pm
United Muscovite Nations wrote:New haven america wrote:Hillary: Wants to preserve good social and economic policies created during the Obama Era, as well as keeping our environment safe.
Trump: Fuck that shit, let's sell our national parks tomymy son's business buddies!
Hillary's decent points don't change that she wanted to destroy another Arab nation to finish Bush's work in screwing over the Arab world.
by Ifreann » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:57 pm
Valyrian Freeholds wrote:I see a possible loophole with the new emails that have arisen around Mr Trump Jr.
Could the Trump Administration claim that as the there is no such thing as the "Crown Prosecutor of Russia", they technically didn't deal with a foreign government?
by New haven america » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:57 pm
by The East Marches II » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:57 pm
by New haven america » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:58 pm
by The East Marches II » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:58 pm
by United Muscovite Nations » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:59 pm
by New haven america » Tue Jul 11, 2017 3:00 pm
The East Marches II wrote:New haven america wrote:I never said I was wrong, I understood what he was doing, but he still made no sense.
Of course, most people trying to defend Trump don't make sense, so eh.
But your posts clearly does not reflect to above
I hope you get better at identifying Trump supporters. This is getting old; the whole correcting you thing.
by The East Marches II » Tue Jul 11, 2017 3:00 pm
New haven america wrote:The East Marches II wrote:
But your posts clearly does not reflect to above
I hope you get better at identifying Trump supporters. This is getting old; the whole correcting you thing.
I see you're still in the game of making useless points that contribute nothing to the current conversation, I thought you'd be over that by now, but alas.
Whatever you say, Trump supporter TEM.
by Genivaria » Tue Jul 11, 2017 3:01 pm
by Washington Resistance Army » Tue Jul 11, 2017 3:01 pm
New haven america wrote:The East Marches II wrote:
But your posts clearly does not reflect to above
I hope you get better at identifying Trump supporters. This is getting old; the whole correcting you thing.
I see you're still in the game of making useless points that contribute nothing to the current conversation, I thought you'd be over that by now, but alas.
Whatever you say, Trump supporter TEM.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Cerespasia, Cerula, Cyptopir, Elejamie
Advertisement