Advertisement
by Greater Allidron » Wed May 24, 2017 3:37 pm
by The Akasha Colony » Wed May 24, 2017 8:09 pm
Greater Allidron wrote:How does doctrine affect the sizes of divisions?
by Onekawa-Nukanor » Wed May 24, 2017 9:08 pm
by The Akasha Colony » Wed May 24, 2017 9:10 pm
Onekawa-Nukanor wrote:Just asking if anyone knows the name of a warship calculator? I've been racking my brain but I can't for the life of me remember what it was.
I remember you would put in figures like length, armour thickness, gun size (It was mainly intended for big gun ships) and so on and it would give you the tonnage and so on.
by Onekawa-Nukanor » Wed May 24, 2017 9:13 pm
The Akasha Colony wrote:Onekawa-Nukanor wrote:Just asking if anyone knows the name of a warship calculator? I've been racking my brain but I can't for the life of me remember what it was.
I remember you would put in figures like length, armour thickness, gun size (It was mainly intended for big gun ships) and so on and it would give you the tonnage and so on.
I presume you're referring to SpringSharp?
by Puzikas » Thu May 25, 2017 4:56 am
North Arkana wrote:>talking about needing to change CASEVAC
>making every reference to MEDEVAC instead
Sevvania wrote:I don't post much, but I am always here.
Usually waiting for Puz ;-;
by North Arkana » Thu May 25, 2017 5:28 am
Puzikas wrote:North Arkana wrote:>talking about needing to change CASEVAC
>making every reference to MEDEVAC instead
Until the pt is stable and in an environment in which they have the lowest probably of being further exposed to fire and environmental exposure, and a chain of care that reaches the level of a critical Care Professional instead of BLS or ALS model as followed by most combat units, they are considered a casualty.
A battalion aid station probably isnt that environment. I would make an argument in low intensity conflicts like Afghanistan and Iraq, they aren't until they reach Bagram or, if you want to really get super idealistic, Landstuhl.
by Greater Allidron » Thu May 25, 2017 8:41 am
The Akasha Colony wrote:Greater Allidron wrote:How does doctrine affect the sizes of divisions?
It affects the arrangement, size, and equipment of all of your units from squad on up, and thus it obviously affects division size. But there's no simple linear relationship because doctrines don't exist on a simple linear scale. There are lots of doctrinal factors that could make a division larger or smaller.
by New Oyashima » Thu May 25, 2017 12:31 pm
by Gallia- » Thu May 25, 2017 12:32 pm
by Laywenrania » Thu May 25, 2017 12:36 pm
New Oyashima wrote:Let's say I'm Japan with CVNs. What should my main carrier aircraft be if I can't afford to fill them with F35s?
Nachmere wrote:Tanks are tough bastards.
Gallia- wrote: And I'm emotionally attached to large, cuddly, wide Objects.
by Gallia- » Thu May 25, 2017 12:45 pm
by The Corparation » Thu May 25, 2017 2:35 pm
New Oyashima wrote:Let's say I'm Japan with CVNs. What should my main carrier aircraft be if I can't afford to fill them with F35s?
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
by Rhodesialund » Thu May 25, 2017 4:56 pm
The Corparation wrote:New Oyashima wrote:Let's say I'm Japan with CVNs. What should my main carrier aircraft be if I can't afford to fill them with F35s?
I think a ricer version of the F-18 would make a lot of sense. Set up the same sort of agreement that they did to make the F-2 except based on f18 instead of f16
by Gallia- » Thu May 25, 2017 4:56 pm
The Corparation wrote:New Oyashima wrote:Let's say I'm Japan with CVNs. What should my main carrier aircraft be if I can't afford to fill them with F35s?
I think a ricer version of the F-18 would make a lot of sense. Set up the same sort of agreement that they did to make the F-2 except based on f18 instead of f16
by The Akasha Colony » Thu May 25, 2017 5:10 pm
Greater Allidron wrote:My real question I guess is how would I go about determining what size to make my units at all, or better yet how does what you want to do with the army affect the size of its units?
If I am fighting closer to home should I make my divisions larger or smaller?
Brigade or division based?
by The Corparation » Thu May 25, 2017 5:19 pm
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
by Gallia- » Thu May 25, 2017 5:21 pm
The Corparation wrote:mai domestic design
by Hurtful Thoughts » Thu May 25, 2017 5:26 pm
Halfblakistan wrote:What would be a realistic amphibious troop transport for a developing archipelagic country? I was looking at the DUKW and imagined that an island country would need to upgrade during the middle of the Cold War. The M113 looks good, but what would replace that?
Mokostana wrote:See, Hurty cared not if the mission succeeded or not, as long as it was spectacular trainwreck. Sometimes that was the host Nation firing a SCUD into a hospital to destroy a foreign infection and accidentally sparking a rebellion... or accidentally starting the Mokan Drug War
Blackhelm Confederacy wrote:If there was only a "like" button for NS posts....
by The Corparation » Thu May 25, 2017 5:31 pm
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
by Rhodesialund » Thu May 25, 2017 5:39 pm
The Corparation wrote:I wasn't thinking of buying off the shelf so much as I was thinking of a domestic design derived from the F-18. Like how the F-2 was derived from the F-16.
by Taihei Tengoku » Thu May 25, 2017 5:44 pm
Gallia- wrote:Navalized F-2
by The Corparation » Thu May 25, 2017 5:45 pm
Rhodesialund wrote:The Corparation wrote:I wasn't thinking of buying off the shelf so much as I was thinking of a domestic design derived from the F-18. Like how the F-2 was derived from the F-16.
>Larger F/A-18
>More Loadout
>Better electronics
>more capability than previous
You basically listed an F/A-18 Superhornet Famalam.
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
by Gallia- » Thu May 25, 2017 5:48 pm
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Advertisement