Condemn Union of the Fascist Nations

by **NDH Republic** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 10:47 am

This proposal was made by the TBC based on an incident. They are abusing the Council's powers in an effort to make us look as criminals. We regret that.

by **Belgija** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 10:52 am

This is a role-playing game, it shouldn't matter what our political views are and we haven't done anything punishable by condemnation.

by **Mackenzia** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 10:53 am

We have done nothing wrong

by **NDH Republic** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 11:00 am

They are abusing the WA

by **NDH Republic** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 11:22 am

Delegates that approved it are left-wing terrorists

by **Chuching** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 11:28 am

Belgija wrote:This is a role-playing game, it shouldn't matter what our political views are and we haven't done anything punishable by condemnation.

Exactly. If they're going to condemn fascist regions, they had better condemn Psychotic Dictatorships first! We routinely torture and massacre sympathizers to that IDIOTIC CHOKED MESH OF BUREAUCRACY known as the "World Assembly", protestors, political dissenters, jaywalkers, and pretty much anybody else who we want to!

Besides, they would also have to condemn North Korea if they started condemning regions based off of their political ideologies. It is a genuine communist region(Not a satirical one), as evidenced by the ubiquitous posting of links to news articles, paragraph-long communist raves, and more.

by **Frisbeeteria** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 11:30 am

NDH Republic wrote:They are abusing the WA

Perfectly legal.

NDH Republic wrote:Delegates that approved it are left-wing terrorists

Not so legal. You don't get to flame other players by calling them terrorists. *** Warned for flaming. ***

by **Tinhampton** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 2:32 pm

Not exactly the most stellar of proposals. If he's reading this, I'd recommend that CANB withdraw this proposal, redraft it in this thread, and then resubmit it. This needs some expansion (for example, for us people not aware of the Union's internal RP, there could be a more detailed background to the Quebec incident other than "it was a joke taken too far"). However, this proposal is also illegal under Rule 3 - the target ("Union of the Fascist Nations") is not the same as what the operative clause condemns ("the Union of Fascist Nations").

Text as submitted for posterity:

Condemn Union Of The Fascist Nations
A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.
Category: Condemnation
Nominee: Union of the Fascist Nations
Proposed by: The Communist Alliance of New Britain
- Revised -

OBSERVING that they escalated a joke (the Quebec incident) into a war threat.

CONSIDERING they follow an ideology built on genocide.

FURTHER CONSIDERING that they support an Ideal that condemns freedom and liberty, which is what the WA stands for.

OBSERVING that their ideology is about hierarchy and the fact that they believe certain groups are undesirable, either from a social or cultural view.

NOTICING that they will bait regions into doing something innocent and will threaten to invade because of that.

Hereby CONDEMNS the Union of Fascist Nations.

by **United Nations of Earth Federation** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 5:58 pm

This proposal was made by members of our RMB.
They do not represent us since most of the time they do what they want.

by **Hobbesistan** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 7:50 pm

I wouldn't worry about this making it to vote.

by **Yugo-Austria** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 7:54 pm

CONSIDERING they follow an ideology built on genocide.
-fascism isnt built on genocide LOL

FURTHER CONSIDERING that they support an Ideal that condemns freedom and liberty, which is what the WA stands for.
-fascism is about having a powerful central leader to make the good decisions the majority of the population can't make. life is usually actually pretty good for the common people.

OBSERVING that their ideology is about hierarchy and the fact that they believe certain groups are undesirable, either from a social or cultural view.
-nothing's wrong with hierarchy, and fascism isn't about undesirable groups. that's more of national socialism.

by **Polvamaa** » Sun Apr 30, 2017 1:15 am

This is absolutely unnecessary. Most of these condemnations are made by communists or socialists (Most of the time.) But communism has caused more terror than anything else.

by **Hyggemata** » Sun Apr 30, 2017 1:48 am

While I have absolutely no idea how I ended up in this region, I'd defend the region's position by quoting a recent post made by its founder so stating:

German Wehrmacht wrote:No racism/discrimination

I interpret this as an IC statement, since it is posted in II and makes references to IC actions by nations.

by **Emericia** » Sun Apr 30, 2017 3:06 am

Condemn Union Of The Fascist Nations
A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.
Category: Condemnation
Nominee: Union of the Fascist Nations
Proposed by: Emericia

OBSERVING that the Union of Fascist Nations are literally Nazis.

ASSERTING that Nazis are bad.

FURTHER ASSERTING that anyone I don't like is a Nazi.

FURTHER ASSERTING that the Union of Fascist Nations LITERALLY WORSE THAN HITLER.

Hereby CONDEMNS the Union of Fascist Nations.

Seriously though, do we really need to condemn them. They seem too easily triggered to be a real threat.

by **Forces of Doom** » Sun Apr 30, 2017 4:22 am

what utter tosh!

Condemn Union of the Fascist Nations

Condemn Union of the Fascist Nations

Who is online