by NeW lIbErAlIsTaN » Tue Apr 18, 2017 4:01 am
by Twilight Sparkle » Tue Apr 18, 2017 4:05 am
by Gurori » Tue Apr 18, 2017 4:08 am
Mallorea and Riva wrote:Ideological Ban: Proposals cannot wholly outlaw, whether through direct or indirect language, religious, political or economic ideologies. However, proposals can target specific practices, such as slavery.
Blockers:: Proposals cannot be "repeal-proof" or prohibit legislation on broad and specific issues. However, 'Blockers' themselves are not illegal provided there is additional action (eg. GAR#10: Nuclear Arms Possession Act).
by Higher Japan » Tue Apr 18, 2017 4:10 am
NOTICE: As of 14/10, the empress has officially been granted greater control of the government, including military and financial sectors. That is all, have a good day.
by Grays Harbor » Tue Apr 18, 2017 5:50 am
This cannot be repealed once passed, and if you want to go to heven, vote for it!!
by The New European Order » Tue Apr 18, 2017 10:39 am
by UKCS » Tue Apr 18, 2017 10:41 am
by Covenstone » Tue Apr 18, 2017 12:27 pm
New Liberalistan wrote:This is my first.
Beleiving that atheists are evil,
I decided to write this law of god, Because god wants me 2 do this important thing.
Athiests are blaspheming, and must be put to changning jail to change to god believing good people.
This cannot be repealed once passed, and if you want to go to heven, vote for it!!
How do you join the assembely?
by Wealthatonia » Tue Apr 18, 2017 7:02 pm
by Farnhamia » Tue Apr 18, 2017 7:53 pm
Wealthatonia wrote:Your god is a nut ambassador and i recommend you stop drinking the cool aid.
by Wealthatonia » Tue Apr 18, 2017 8:24 pm
by The Greater Siriusian Domain » Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:44 pm
by Covenstone » Wed Apr 19, 2017 6:30 pm
The Greater Siriusian Domain wrote:Teran Saber: "What is a god, but a miserable little pile of lies created to control the masses? What is heaven, but a mere empty promise to make people accept their suffering instead of trying to make things better for themselves and others? Personal thoughts aside, the Greater Siriusian Domain finds this proposal disgusting."
"The Greater Siriusian Domain opposes this proposal on principle, and further more motions to CONDEMN New Liberalistan."
by The Greater Siriusian Domain » Wed Apr 19, 2017 6:39 pm
Covenstone wrote:The Greater Siriusian Domain wrote:Teran Saber: "What is a god, but a miserable little pile of lies created to control the masses? What is heaven, but a mere empty promise to make people accept their suffering instead of trying to make things better for themselves and others? Personal thoughts aside, the Greater Siriusian Domain finds this proposal disgusting."
"The Greater Siriusian Domain opposes this proposal on principle, and further more motions to CONDEMN New Liberalistan."
I support the idea to oppose the proposal, but since it was their first and so far only post, I think condemning them might be a little bit of overkill.
by Gurori » Wed Apr 19, 2017 8:22 pm
by Araraukar » Thu Apr 20, 2017 12:30 am
The Greater Siriusian Domain wrote:OOC: You're probably going to lose that debate simply because it's you against a mod. I'd suggest going ahead and marking your posts specifically as being in-character from now on.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Harbertia » Thu Apr 20, 2017 12:35 am
by Covenstone » Thu Apr 20, 2017 4:15 am
The Greater Siriusian Domain wrote:Covenstone wrote:
I support the idea to oppose the proposal, but since it was their first and so far only post, I think condemning them might be a little bit of overkill.
OOC: Teran Saber isn't supposed to be very forgiving. Or to use his words, he "doesn't suffer fools".
by The Greater Siriusian Domain » Thu Apr 20, 2017 7:58 am
Covenstone wrote:The Greater Siriusian Domain wrote:
OOC: Teran Saber isn't supposed to be very forgiving. Or to use his words, he "doesn't suffer fools".
I am not a big fan of fools either, however I think condemning someone after one post (and only one) post does seem overly mean. And it has been brought to my attention that I am not the best typist at times, and people have been patient with me thus far, so I have a lot of love and forgiveness to go around right now!
by Araraukar » Thu Apr 20, 2017 8:38 am
The Greater Siriusian Domain wrote:OOC: You do realize you're responding IC to an OOC post, right?
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Covenstone » Thu Apr 20, 2017 11:07 am
The Greater Siriusian Domain wrote:Covenstone wrote:
I am not a big fan of fools either, however I think condemning someone after one post (and only one) post does seem overly mean. And it has been brought to my attention that I am not the best typist at times, and people have been patient with me thus far, so I have a lot of love and forgiveness to go around right now!
OOC: You do realize you're responding IC to an OOC post, right? Well, either that or you're not even minding the IC/OOC divide that's required in the general assembly.
by The Greater Siriusian Domain » Thu Apr 20, 2017 11:19 am
Covenstone wrote:The Greater Siriusian Domain wrote:
OOC: You do realize you're responding IC to an OOC post, right? Well, either that or you're not even minding the IC/OOC divide that's required in the general assembly.
<ooc> I do apologise. But although there are rules for proposals, there are no real guidelines for posting in the General Assembly. There is a Q&A thread, but it has over 2,000 replies and who is going to read through that unless they are insanely bored?
Araraukar sent me some guidelines, and I will try to stick to the general way things are done, but if I do slip up, I apologise in advance.
by Draconae » Thu Apr 20, 2017 1:44 pm
Harbertia wrote:Even as a Theist I find this proposal abhorrent. This isn't going to generate a greater belief in a god or the god. It will serve only to create false faith; a guise. The epitome of, for example, 'Christian in Name Only'.
One who does not believe can utter praise as convincingly as an actor on stage.
by The Republic of Avesta » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:17 pm
New Liberalistan wrote:This is my first.
Beleiving that atheists are evil,
I decided to write this law of god, Because god wants me 2 do this important thing.
Athiests are blaspheming, and must be put to changning jail to change to god believing good people.
This cannot be repealed once passed, and if you want to go to heven, vote for it!!
How do you join the assembely?
by Vigilante justice » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:20 pm
New Liberalistan wrote:This is my first.
Beleiving that atheists are evil,
I decided to write this law of god, Because god wants me 2 do this important thing.
Athiests are blaspheming, and must be put to changning jail to change to god believing good people.
This cannot be repealed once passed, and if you want to go to heven, vote for it!!
How do you join the assembely?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: The Southern Dependencies
Advertisement