by Shah-Armen » Thu Feb 16, 2017 5:42 am
by LollerLand » Thu Feb 16, 2017 7:32 am
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Thu Feb 16, 2017 7:45 am
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Shah-Armen » Fri Feb 17, 2017 8:32 am
by LollerLand » Fri Feb 17, 2017 9:15 am
by Cerian Quilor » Fri Feb 17, 2017 9:58 am
by Neo Danzig » Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:03 am
Cerian Quilor wrote:Decently written, but personally against. You wanted it, you have to live with it for longer.
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:32 am
Shah-Armen wrote:Okay. I made the requested edits.
Applauding the Security Council for liberating The Arab League from another anti-Muslim occupation;
Grateful to the Arab community and to various concerned regions for helping to stabilize The Arab League by supporting the region’s native government;
Knowing The Arab League’s government is dedicated to preserving the region and will never abandon it, as did the former administration following the passage of SC#200;
Observing the influx of unknown nations to The Arab League;
Fearing SC#213 will enable determined anti-Muslim forces to topple the native government and destabilize The Arab League;
Believing that reinstating border controls will allow The Arab League 's rightful government to safeguard against inevitable future invasions;
Hereby Repeals Security Council Resolution #213, "Liberate the Arab League."
Look better?
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Cerian Quilor » Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:34 am
by Aclion » Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:39 am
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:40 am
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Roavin » Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:46 am
by Aclion » Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:52 am
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:56 am
Roavin wrote:Cerian Quilor wrote:They should be punished until people stop abusing the liberation resolution. It is used far too often and too much.
So we arbitarily pick on TAL, one of the smaller ones and less likely to be able to defend itself in the first place, because others (including KGB's piler force, The Invaders) have abused the system?
Where was this mindset when The Invaders (who back then were actual invaders) were obviously and deliberately shitting on the sanctity of the Security Council with proposal after proposal submitted for purposes of recruitment and publicity?
(I don't mean you personally, CQ, I know you weren't around)
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Cerian Quilor » Fri Feb 17, 2017 11:12 am
Roavin wrote:Cerian Quilor wrote:They should be punished until people stop abusing the liberation resolution. It is used far too often and too much.
So we arbitarily pick on TAL, one of the smaller ones and less likely to be able to defend itself in the first place, because others (including KGB's piler force, The Invaders) have abused the system?
Where was this mindset when The Invaders (who back then were actual invaders) were obviously and deliberately shitting on the sanctity of the Security Council with proposal after proposal submitted for purposes of recruitment and publicity?
(I don't mean you personally, CQ, I know you weren't around)
by Cerian Quilor » Fri Feb 17, 2017 11:13 am
by Borduria22 » Mon Feb 20, 2017 4:09 am
by Kaboomlandia » Mon Feb 20, 2017 8:00 am
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Mon Feb 20, 2017 9:21 am
Kaboomlandia wrote:Looks like there was a hiccup, this should've gone to vote at the last major but didn't.
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Kaboomlandia » Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:36 am
by Shah-Armen » Mon Feb 20, 2017 6:19 pm
Kaboomlandia wrote:Looks like there was a hiccup, this should've gone to vote at the last major but didn't.
by Kaboomlandia » Mon Feb 20, 2017 6:21 pm
by Wallenburg » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:43 am
by Konstantinovka » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:10 pm
Cerian Quilor wrote:Decently written, but personally against. You wanted it, you have to live with it for longer.
by Kitzerland » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:34 pm
Konstantinovka wrote:Cerian Quilor wrote:Decently written, but personally against. You wanted it, you have to live with it for longer.
I agree with this guy. The Arab League should be occupied always, not to protect the region from invasions, but to protect other regions from invasion by this region. Control the amount of nations allowed in the Arab League.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement