SoJuWaland: 96.85 - This is a Very High level of equality and human rights offered to LGBT+ people. SoJuWaland has incorporated extensive rights and protections for LGBT+ people into its legal corpus and this appears to be backed by a strong cultural acceptance of their community. The only loss of points were incredibly minor - in the section concerning bodily integrity the ARV recommends that administrative gender change procedures are implemented to allow a person's gender on official documents to conform with their gender identity, and that for the purposes of health and wellbeing intersex minors no longer receive non-necessary surgical intervention. Aside from these deductions, SoJuWaland can be proud of its comprehensive and world-class provisions for its LGBT+ citizens.
Valgora: 70.75 - This is a High level of equality and human rights offered to LGBT+ people. Significant point deductions were made in the sections concerning bodily integrity, hate legislation and asylum. Of particular concern to the ARV were some of the draconian laws concerning bodily integrity, including the necessity for sterilisation prior to changing one's gender. The ARV urges Valgora to liberalise these laws and to consider implementing more stringent hate speech laws in protection of a particularly-vulnerable section of society. However, Valgora scored highly overall because of the extensive provision of legal and constitutional rights afforded to the LGBT+ community as well as the perfect degree of familial protections. In general the ARV notes with pleasure the direction in which Valgora is taking with regards to the LGBT+ rights agenda and hopes to see future progress.
Schirmer: 59.5 - This is a Moderate level of equality and human rights offered to LGBT+ people. There are obvious areas of concern where LGBT+ citizens of Schirmer are denied any rights, protections or opportunities, the most obvious being in the category of bodily integrity but also in familial rights. It is odd, therefore, that strong legal protections exist, particularly against hate speech and hate crime. The ARV senses a progressive strain within Schirmer's approach to LGBT+ issues and encourages its government to liberalise laws concerning bodily integrity as well as extending familial rights to the LGBT+ community. Until then, the ARV's assessment of the LGBT+ situation in Schirmer can only be mixed at best.
Wiewawoe: 4.05 - This is a Very Low level of equality and human rights offered to LGBT+ people. Despite the jolly name of the country, Wiewawoe has a deplorable record of providing rights, protections and opportunities to LGBT+ people. In almost every assessed case it appears as though the government of Wiewawoe has either deliberately denied equality to its LGBT+ community or has consciously ignored their situation. Extensive reforms would be required from the ground up in order to bring Wiewawoe into line with even the most basic legal regimes concerning LGBT+ minorities.