NATION

PASSWORD

[DRAFT] Condemn Mikeswill

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 12659
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Tue Dec 20, 2016 11:41 am

We probably ought not set the precedent of condemning people for their political views vis-à-vis the Security Council. Seems rather rash and unthoughtful. In fact, it would basically be like condemning Europe for not voting in Security Council resolutions. It's the right and prerogative of any player to vote how they wish. We should condemn people for actions, not for beliefs.

Author: 1 SC and 56+ GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
GenSec (24 Dec 2021 –); posts not official unless so indicated
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Twice-commended toxic villainous globalist kittehs

User avatar
States of Glory
Diplomat
 
Posts: 589
Founded: Jul 28, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby States of Glory » Tue Dec 20, 2016 2:57 pm

Escape from Trump wrote:I don't think you can condemn someone for disagreeing with you.

I disagree. Condemn me!
#KanyeForPresident2K20
Make America Great Britain Again!
TWP's Minister for WA Affairs

User avatar
Consular
Minister
 
Posts: 3019
Founded: Apr 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Consular » Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:14 pm

Mikeswill should be condemned for shamelessly reposting the same irksome statement on every single SC proposal.

User avatar
Mikeswill
Envoy
 
Posts: 248
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby Mikeswill » Thu Dec 22, 2016 10:32 pm

Consular wrote:Mikeswill should be condemned for shamelessly reposting the same irksome statement on every single SC proposal.



Yeah Buddy!
Love Conquers Fear
NationStates

User avatar
Sygian II
Diplomat
 
Posts: 534
Founded: Jun 14, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Sygian II » Fri Dec 23, 2016 10:18 pm

I leave for a day and come back to see that this still exists. THE IRONY!
Benevolent Thomas wrote:The Black Hawks continue to be the largest and most successful invader organization in NationStates


Maj. Sygian

Council Advisor of The Black Hawks

User avatar
Naginii
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 103
Founded: Jul 21, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Naginii » Fri Jan 06, 2017 2:19 pm

A body dedicated to "freedom" (and all the freedoms wrapped-up in that loaded word) wants to condemn a nation for it's speech, it's ideas, it's expression — about this very group.

So, in the WASC we're all for freedom of speech, etc. so long as it isn't about the WASC.

Animal Farm much?
Last edited by Naginii on Fri Jan 06, 2017 2:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
The Wiganese Islands
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 11
Founded: Jul 21, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby The Wiganese Islands » Thu Jan 17, 2019 3:16 pm

I agree with this because, while I was inactive, he sent me 2 telegrams telling me to endorse him, so I endorsed him, withdrew it, changed my flag to I will not endorse mikeswill and got banned. Then I got banned from the Invaders.
The Highlander 1 turned out to be mikeswill, and he banned me, so we went to the north pacific!

He should be condemned!
:evil:
404 Error: Signature not found

User avatar
Ransium
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6788
Founded: Oct 17, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Ransium » Thu Jan 17, 2019 3:26 pm

Don’t gravedig old threads. If OP wants to resume drafting, they can make a request in moderation to have this thread unlocked.

Commended by SC 236,
WA Delegate of Forest from March 20th, 2007 to August 19, 2020.
Author of WA Resolutions: SC 221, SC 224, SC 233, SC 243, SC 265, GA 403, GA 439, GA 445,GA 463,GA 465,
Issues Editor since January 20th, 2017 with some down time.
Author of 27 issues. First editor of 44.
Moderator since November 10th 2017 with some down time.

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Arakhkhar

Advertisement

Remove ads