Black Mississippi Church Torched

[Wallenburg]

As silly this might sound, but do you guys think that white-supremacist terrorism will rise if Hillary Clinton wins the presidency? Because I believe so.

Probably, since a lot of Trump supporters have been caught on tape openly saying they hate democracy and will try to start a civil war if their god-emperor doesn't get elected.

[Thermodolia]

And this is why sane people are scared of Trump supporters

And this is why I am scared of both Hillary and Trump supporters. Newt fucking Gingrich showed up at my college, I couldn't even get food for fear of getting my ass chewed by random people. The reason? I was wearing a hat with an American flag and Multicam-pattern all over it.


I think both candidates are shit, so I refuse to vote for them. I'll vote for state candidates this year instead.

A lot of those guys aren't much better

[Crockerland]

It doesn't excuse their actions, but people going to Trump rallies to intentionally start shit with Trump supporters at their own rallies getting shoved is not even remotely a problem compared to fucking angry mobs rioting against Trump supporters.

What are you talking about?

Are you seriously going to deny that some Trump supporters are violent because the other side protests more?

Nope, never put words in my mouth again, thanks.

[Thermodolia]

As silly this might sound, but do you guys think that white-supremacist terrorism will rise if Hillary Clinton wins the presidency? Because I believe so.

I've never thought of that. But if it didn't rise when Obama was elected why would it start now?

[Washington Resistance Army]

Ignore the numerous violent anti-trump rallies and the countless assaults on Trump supporters, close your eyes, cover your ears, and shout as loud as you can that Trump's supporters are the violent ones.

This isn't the first time Trump supporters have done a violent act.

It also wouldn't be the first time Hillary supporters have done something to make it seem like Trump supporters are horrible evil people.

[Thermodolia]

What are you talking about?

Are you seriously going to deny that some Trump supporters are violent because the other side protests more?

Nope, never put words in my mouth again, thanks.

I didn't put words in your mouth, I asked you a question. Big difference

[Sareva]

And this is why I am scared of both Hillary and Trump supporters. Newt fucking Gingrich showed up at my college, I couldn't even get food for fear of getting my ass chewed by random people. The reason? I was wearing a hat with an American flag and Multicam-pattern all over it.


I think both candidates are shit, so I refuse to vote for them. I'll vote for state candidates this year instead.

A lot of those guys aren't much better

You have a point there. At least we aren't dealing with the decision of "which shit would rather have?"

[The Portland Territory]

As silly this might sound, but do you guys think that white-supremacist terrorism will rise if Hillary Clinton wins the presidency? Because I believe so.

I've never thought of that. But if it didn't rise when Obama was elected why would it start now?

Well, the racial division did grow more under Obama, so i wouldn't be surprised if it grew more under Clinton, or Trump. Ergo, it's gonna keep growing no matter what

[Southeastern Xiatao]

And this is why sane people are scared of Trump supporters

And this is why I am scared of both Hillary and Trump supporters. Newt fucking Gingrich showed up at my college, I couldn't even get food for fear of getting my ass chewed by random people. The reason? I was wearing a hat with an American flag and Multicam-pattern all over it.


I think both candidates are shit, so I refuse to vote for them. I'll vote for state candidates this year instead.

Then I honestly don't think it is a good idea to allow yourself to not vote in this election would be more worse. I mean would you want Trump to win by simply not going to voting polls on Election Day?

[Even Less of Mackonia]

I thought the wonderful legacy of Joe Cox showed Social-Humanists nobody really cares about false-flags these days?

[Ebliania]

I thought the wonderful legacy of Joe Cocks showed Social-Humanists nobody really cares about false-flags these days?

Who?

[Southeastern Xiatao]

I've never thought of that. But if it didn't rise when Obama was elected why would it start now?

Well, the racial division did grow more under Obama, so i wouldn't be surprised if it grew more under Clinton, or Trump. Ergo, it's gonna keep growing no matter what

Hopefully they will be stopped eventually. Domestic terrorism was a major thing paid attention by the media in the 1980's and 1990's. (Foreign terrorism was also paid attention as well!). Like the Oklahoma City Bombing, Atlanta Olympic Games bombing, Waco Siege, etc. But after 9/11 happened it seemed that all the media decided to pay almost complete attention towards foreign terrorism, especially Islamic extremism. While domestic terrorism was paid less attention to.

If you as me the media should both pay attention to foreign and domestic terrorism. Why? Because it still is terrorism.

[Uiiop]

I thought the wonderful legacy of Joe Cocks showed Social-Humanists nobody really cares about false-flags these days?

Who?

A British man apparently
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/ma ... ed-4735011
With no indication that of a political motive even projected onto him.

[Southeastern Xiatao]

As silly this might sound, but do you guys think that white-supremacist terrorism will rise if Hillary Clinton wins the presidency? Because I believe so.

I've never thought of that. But if it didn't rise when Obama was elected why would it start now?

I wouldn't be surprised honestly. But like I said before just like any terrorism, it will be dealt with and eventually defeated. I have high hopes always.

[Sareva]

And this is why I am scared of both Hillary and Trump supporters. Newt fucking Gingrich showed up at my college, I couldn't even get food for fear of getting my ass chewed by random people. The reason? I was wearing a hat with an American flag and Multicam-pattern all over it.


I think both candidates are shit, so I refuse to vote for them. I'll vote for state candidates this year instead.

Then I honestly don't think it is a good idea to allow yourself to not vote in this election would be more worse. I mean would you want Trump to win by simply not going to voting polls on Election Day?

What I said was BOTH CANDIDATES ARE SHIT AND I REFUSE TO VOTE FOR EITHER OF THEM. If I vote for Hillary, I am voting for someone I equally dislike. It is my right to not vote. I don't have a civic duty to vote for the shiniest of two shitstains.

[Crockerland]

Nope, never put words in my mouth again, thanks.

I didn't put words in your mouth, I asked you a question. Big difference

Deplorable dishonesty. The "question" was obviously worded to heavily imply that that was the position I took.

Compare "Are you saying that the sky isn't blue?" to "Are you seriously going to deny that the sky is blue?"; The ladder does not make sense if the person the question is directed at has not denied the sky being blue.

[Implacable Death]

Then I honestly don't think it is a good idea to allow yourself to not vote in this election would be more worse. I mean would you want Trump to win by simply not going to voting polls on Election Day?

What I said was BOTH CANDIDATES ARE SHIT AND I REFUSE TO VOTE FOR EITHER OF THEM. If I vote for Hillary, I am voting for someone I equally dislike. It is my right to not vote. I don't have a civic duty to vote for the shiniest of two shitstains.

Your wording made laugh because it reminded me of an ERB battle: https://youtu.be/dX_1B0w7Hzc?t=2m19s

[Even Less of Mackonia]

Who?

A British man apparently
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/ma ... ed-4735011
With no indication that of a political motive even projected onto him.

I never say 'kek', but if I did, now would be a time where I did so.

[Thermodolia]

I didn't put words in your mouth, I asked you a question. Big difference

Deplorable dishonesty. The "question" was obviously worded to heavily imply that that was the position I took.

Compare "Are you saying that the sky isn't blue?" to "Are you seriously going to deny that the sky is blue?"; The ladder does not make sense if the person the question is directed at has not denied the sky being blue.

It was still a question none the less. It seemed like you where denying the existence of violent Trump supporters and blaming the other side for making innocent Trump supporters violent

[Southeastern Xiatao]

This is election is full defintion of the TV Trope, Black and White Morality. No middle ground whatsoever....

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/BlackAndWhiteMorality

[Sareva]

What I said was BOTH CANDIDATES ARE SHIT AND I REFUSE TO VOTE FOR EITHER OF THEM. If I vote for Hillary, I am voting for someone I equally dislike. It is my right to not vote. I don't have a civic duty to vote for the shiniest of two shitstains.

Your wording made laugh because it reminded me of an ERB battle: https://youtu.be/dX_1B0w7Hzc?t=2m19s

I don't have to click the link to know what you are talking about. That's why I put it in there.

[Uiiop]

A British man apparently
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/ma ... ed-4735011
With no indication that of a political motive even projected onto him.

I never say 'kek', but if I did, now would be a time where I did so.

Well it's not like you provided another man with the same nameor proved that he was a false flag...somehow. Maybe your Drug department was actually high as fuck and thought this would be a good idea

Oh wait the female lawmaker is one who you were referring to....well maybe i haven't see all of but "It was so convenient to them" even if true doesn't seem like solid evidence for them making it up. Under that logic Watergate can't have been real. The democrats got a boon with that one.

[Even Less of Mackonia]

I never say 'kek', but if I did, now would be a time where I did so.

Well it's not like you provided another man with the same nameor proved that he was a false flag...somehow. Maybe your Drug department was actually high as fuck and thought this would be a good idea

Oh wait the lawmaker is one who were referring to...oh...well maybe i haven't see all of but "It was so convenient to them" even if true doesn't seem like solid evidence for them making it up. Under that logic Watergate can't have been real. The democrats got a boon with that one.

Watergate wasn't real, Nixon was framed doing the behaviour any dignified head of state engages in because he had successfully challenged the Social-Humanist establishment.

[Uiiop]

Well it's not like you provided another man with the same nameor proved that he was a false flag...somehow. Maybe your Drug department was actually high as fuck and thought this would be a good idea

Oh wait the lawmaker is one who were referring to...oh...well maybe i haven't see all of but "It was so convenient to them" even if true doesn't seem like solid evidence for them making it up. Under that logic Watergate can't have been real. The democrats got a boon with that one.

Watergate wasn't real, Nixon was framed doing the behaviour any dignified head of state engages in because he had successfully challenged the Social-Humanist establishment.

Alright the benghazi attacks can't be because it was politically convenient for republicans.

[Even Less of Mackonia]

Watergate wasn't real, Nixon was framed doing the behaviour any dignified head of state engages in because he had successfully challenged the Social-Humanist establishment.

Alright the benghazi attacks can't be because it was politically convenient for republicans.

The Republican Party do not have the resources nor incentive to organise an attack on a U.S embassy, and given that the Republican Party are largely puppets of the Democratic Party, why would they want to sabotage them?