I don't oppose equality. What I oppose are ideologies insisting that theirs is the only path to it while insisting that other approaches are againsts equality. Feminist propagandists every few weeks or so denounce egalitarianism as an ideal generally or humanitarianism and insist that these ideas are too vague and that they don't deal with women's issues at all. So the idea that used to be feminism--that it was a pluralistic movement that had a lot of different ideas in it--has become eclipsed by a general approach that includes the following ideas:
- patriarchy theory
- rape culture theory
- the wage gap
- the Duluth Model
- objectification theory
Today nearly any article, academic proposal, policy approaches or activism labeled feminssm include these ideas. The divisions among this mainstream are just by degrees--how radical you are, how liberal-ish you are, but really this is like comparing one denomination fo Christianity today with another. They may carry things out differently, but they generally have the idea that you have clergy and the regular congregation, the Nicene Creed and so on.
So for example with the wage gap idea, the question is not 'do you agree with this economic theory' but 'do you support women's rights'. I have a problem with that always being the question, because sometimes that is not the issue when it comes to being dubious about feminist policies.