Equalaria didn't mention men. Chess would have jumped on the man hate train immediately.
Advertisement
by Frenline Delpha » Tue Sep 13, 2016 9:49 am
by Balkenreich » Tue Sep 13, 2016 9:50 am
by Geilinor » Tue Sep 13, 2016 9:58 am
The New Sea Territory wrote:Hey everyone, let's just get outraged at the social studies warriors and their ebul agenda. No one pay attention to why the Black Student Union feels this is necessary, or what conditions lead to this situation, and how it could have been otherwise handled.
These threads get really fucking annoying and predictable. We need a megathread for these sorts of outrage-threads so all the self-aggrandizing circlejerks and buzzwordry can be confined to one place.
by Alvecia » Tue Sep 13, 2016 10:40 am
Frenline Delpha wrote:Equalaria wrote:This actually makes sense. The pervasive white racism is not adequately combated by measures in the form of policy and policing anymore- keeping black students safe is what matters. This is a means to prevent further oppression, which in time will help black students succeed where they would otherwise be put down and made to feel inferior by the institutional racism of the country they are in
I'm putting 200 USD on Poe.
by Imperializt Russia » Tue Sep 13, 2016 12:02 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:King wanted his children to be able to hold hands with white children - he wanted there to be nothing telling them they couldn't.
And nothing about this does.
Black dorms doesn't mean "whites out, trespassers will be shot", and vice versa on the white dorms. It's not pissing No Man's Land.
Even so, I don't think this is abolition of mixed dorms, it's black dorms for black students who want them. Other black (and other ethnic) students can almost certainly choose to remain in the mixed dorms, which will be populated heavily by whites.
, king wanted full integration. This does not lead to that. For example King supported school bussing whether the parents wanted it or not.. I don't really think I am going to change your mind on this, but obviously on this tangent we disagree.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Des-Bal » Tue Sep 13, 2016 12:07 pm
Imperializt Russia wrote:Because I think you're reading into King things he did not say or mean.
King supported it "whether parents wanted or not", because he wanted to smash the idea that they shouldn't be allowed to - an idea that was prevalent at that time, because he was fighting the actual policy of segregation, established on the basis that blacks were inferior and shouldn't be allowed to.
An idea that, thanks to the work and indeed life of King and thousands like him, is no longer prevalent.
No-one is stopping anything here.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Wallenburg » Tue Sep 13, 2016 12:13 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Yes, Martin Luther King would have encouraged racism.
by Des-Bal » Tue Sep 13, 2016 12:14 pm
Wallenburg wrote:
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Wallenburg » Tue Sep 13, 2016 12:22 pm
by Valystria » Tue Sep 13, 2016 12:25 pm
by Des-Bal » Tue Sep 13, 2016 12:27 pm
Wallenburg wrote:I'm not sure where you are getting that from.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Ostroeuropa » Tue Sep 13, 2016 12:28 pm
by Gauthier » Tue Sep 13, 2016 12:31 pm
by Des-Bal » Tue Sep 13, 2016 12:44 pm
Gauthier wrote:I would not be surprised if this was in response to jack shit being done about complaints by black students of racist harassment.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Socialist Latin American States » Tue Sep 13, 2016 12:44 pm
by Herskerstad » Tue Sep 13, 2016 1:01 pm
Imperializt Russia wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:
But the question was, what did king want, and how does this apply. King wanted integration, he wanted the American dream for all people. He would not approve.
Malcom X, wanted A segregated "equality" (for lack of a better word). Until just before his end, he would have approved and supported the college.
King wanted his children to be able to hold hands with white children - he wanted there to be nothing telling them they couldn't.
And nothing about this does.
Black dorms doesn't mean "whites out, trespassers will be shot", and vice versa on the white dorms. It's not pissing No Man's Land.
Even so, I don't think this is abolition of mixed dorms, it's black dorms for black students who want them. Other black (and other ethnic) students can almost certainly choose to remain in the mixed dorms, which will be populated heavily by whites.
by Socialist Latin American States » Tue Sep 13, 2016 1:09 pm
by Wallenburg » Tue Sep 13, 2016 1:10 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Wallenburg wrote:I'm not sure where you are getting that from.
We are discussing the wishes of a dead man (who contrary to popular opinion is not and was never king of the black people or the arbiter of what is and is not appropriate) and whether or not self segregation is different from state enforced segregation. It doesn't actually because it neglects that even if it is different MLK may have still disapproved and even if he didn't he was just a dude.
by Gauthier » Tue Sep 13, 2016 1:22 pm
by Des-Bal » Tue Sep 13, 2016 1:29 pm
Gauthier wrote:
And so the proper response is to file more complaints that jack shit will be done about like good subservients instead of taking active measures.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Ethel mermania » Tue Sep 13, 2016 1:31 pm
by Gauthier » Tue Sep 13, 2016 1:33 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Gauthier wrote:
And so the proper response is to file more complaints that jack shit will be done about like good subservients instead of taking active measures.
Eating the flesh of newborn babes would also be an active measure and it would also be ill advised. Adopting policies that encourage racism is not an appropriate response to racism.
by Des-Bal » Tue Sep 13, 2016 1:38 pm
Gauthier wrote:
So you're calling for the black students to submit and accept the racism that nothing will still be done about. Because that would have resulted in the Civil Rights Act obviously.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Gauthier » Tue Sep 13, 2016 1:42 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Gauthier wrote:
So you're calling for the black students to submit and accept the racism that nothing will still be done about. Because that would have resulted in the Civil Rights Act obviously.
I'm not sure how much you know about the civil rights act but the side in favor of separating the races did not treat it as a victory.
by Crockerland » Tue Sep 13, 2016 1:47 pm
Gauthier wrote:Des-Bal wrote:
I'm not sure how much you know about the civil rights act but the side in favor of separating the races did not treat it as a victory.
You're declaring that the students need to shut up and accept the racist harassment that nothing is being done about because otherwise the racists win. If there were active administrative actions taken against the harassments in the first place I doubt there would have been a call for a segregated dorm as a shelter to begin with.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bienenhalde, Billyabna, Cerula, Cevennes, Dapant, Floofybit, Philjia, Quasi-Stellar Star Civilizations, Tungstan, Uvolla, Valles Marineris Mining co, Zucksland, Zurkerx
Advertisement