NATION

PASSWORD

[Draft] Recognition of Mental Health

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Adytus
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 441
Founded: Apr 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

[Draft] Recognition of Mental Health

Postby Adytus » Sun Jun 12, 2016 2:44 pm

Ambassador Mike Lynn walks into the room,

"Ambassadors, I have to admit that I am entirely new to this, and my office may have no idea what it is doing; however, I would like to address this issue, and would greatly appreciate all the help. That being said, if this issue is already covered, please let me know! I read a considerable number of resolutions to see if this was address somewhere, and I may have missed it. There is a lot to cover. Thank you for your time, and any comments you would like to provide.”

Recognition of Mental Health
Health | Mild


The General Assembly,

Understanding that detrimental stigmas may form in a society, and that these stigmas may directly hinder human development, a nation’s economic circumstances, and other aspects of the state in a negative fashion.

Wishing to avoid or reduce the development of stigmas around mental health derived from a lack of education on the issue, and direct states in a constructive way to ensure the mental well being of their citizens.

Defining “mental health” has an individual’s psychological, social, and emotional well-being, and that many aspects contribute to the development of mental health issues, such as biological factors, family history, and life experience.

Recognizing the beneficial factors of improving the mental health of individuals across the globe; people can come to realize their full potential, increase work productively, cope with stresses in life, and make a positive impact around them.

Mindful that if no action is taken, numerous people may continue to suffer with depression, the grievances of suicide, substance abuse, anxiety disorders, eating disorders, learning disorders, and numerous other issues regarded as mental health.

Urges member countries to increase awareness and knowledge of mental health issues, and combat negative stigmas that may have developed in a nation’s medical field, as well as the general population.

Mandates that member nations recognize the mental wellbeing of an individual as a health issue, granting people suffering from mental health problems the same rights and treatments outlined by General Assembly Resolution #31.
Necromancer of Arbitration
In Lazarus

User avatar
New Dukaine
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1002
Founded: Feb 16, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby New Dukaine » Sun Jun 12, 2016 2:52 pm

Adytus wrote:Ambassador Mike Lynn walks into the room,

"Ambassadors, I have to admit that I am entirely new to this, and my office may have no idea what it is doing; however, I would like to address this issue, and would greatly appreciate all the help. That being said, if this issue is already covered, please let me know! I read a considerable number of resolutions to see if this was address somewhere, and I may have missed it. There is a lot to cover. Thank you for your time, and any comments you would like to provide.”

Recognition of Mental Health
Health | Mild


The General Assembly,

Understanding that detrimental stigmas may form in a society, and that these stigmas may directly hinder human development, a nation’s economic circumstances, and other aspects of the state in a negative fashion.

Wishing to avoid or reduce the development of stigmas around mental health derived from a lack of education on the issue, and direct states in a constructive way to ensure the mental well being of their citizens.

Defining “mental health” has an individual’s psychological, social, and emotional well-being, and that many aspects contribute to the development of mental health issues, such as biological factors, family history, and life experience.

Recognizing the beneficial factors of improving the mental health of individuals across the globe; people can come to realize their full potential, increase work productively, cope with stresses in life, and make a positive impact around them.

Mindful that if no action is taken, numerous people may continue to suffer with depression, the grievances of suicide, substance abuse, anxiety disorders, eating disorders, learning disorders, and numerous other issues regarded as mental health.

Urges member countries to increase awareness and knowledge of mental health issues, and combat negative stigmas that may have developed in a nation’s medical field, as well as the general population.

Mandates that member nations recognize the mental wellbeing of an individual as a health issue, granting people suffering from mental health problems the same rights and treatments outlined by General Assembly Resolution #31.

Heyo Adytus and welcome over to the General Assembly. I think this resolution might be a duplication of the Internation Psychiatry Act.
If it is not, if a proper fact is given, I will post my opinions in another post.
The Liberal Socialist leaning Democracy of New Dukaine

Former Grey Warden
For RP, New Dukaine is a Modern-Tech nation.
PLEASE, CALL ME NuDu
Participated: Baptism of fire 62, World Cup 75, Australian Football Cup 1
Hosted: Australian Football Cup 1
Ambassador to all branches of the WA is Pama Umoja.
Proud author of GA Resolution 376, Pesticide Regulations

User avatar
Adytus
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 441
Founded: Apr 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Adytus » Sun Jun 12, 2016 2:53 pm

"Ah. I missed that proposal in my reviews, Ambassador. Thank you for bring it to my attention."
Necromancer of Arbitration
In Lazarus

User avatar
Normlpeople
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1597
Founded: Apr 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Normlpeople » Sun Jun 12, 2016 5:11 pm

OOC: This is also a textbook 'house of cards' violation. I'd suggest giving the rules a quick read as well.

Welcome to the festering snakepit!
Words and Opinion of Clover the Clever
Ambassador to the WA for the Armed Kingdom of Normlpeople

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 12659
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Sun Jun 12, 2016 9:44 pm

Normlpeople wrote:OOC: This is also a textbook 'house of cards' violation. I'd suggest giving the rules a quick read as well.

I believe he's referring to the last line, the mandates clause.

OOC: Also, I actively try to generate reasons to vote against proposals that use bolding and do not number their clauses. But that's a discussion for another day...

Author: 1 SC and 56+ GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
GenSec (24 Dec 2021 –); posts not official unless so indicated
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Twice-commended toxic villainous globalist kittehs

User avatar
Wrapper
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6020
Founded: Antiquity
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wrapper » Mon Jun 13, 2016 5:33 am

Imperium Anglorum wrote:OOC: Also, I actively try to generate reasons to vote against proposals that use bolding and do not number their clauses. But that's a discussion for another day...

Why must you try to strongarm new authors into adopting your particular sense of format? There's absolutely nothing wrong with the way this is formatted.

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 12659
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Mon Jun 13, 2016 6:09 am

Wrapper wrote:
Imperium Anglorum wrote:OOC: Also, I actively try to generate reasons to vote against proposals that use bolding and do not number their clauses. But that's a discussion for another day...

Why must you try to strongarm new authors into adopting your particular sense of format? There's absolutely nothing wrong with the way this is formatted.

It also advocate for certain formatting provisions for all authors, not just new ones. Foremost, it is unclear which clauses belong to which class from first glance. And the bolding distracts from the meat of the provisions entailed by diverting your eyes to the operative verb. The lack of numbers also means that it is harder to reference, quote, and parse. So, I don't strong-arm new authors and there is much wrong with this format.
Last edited by Imperium Anglorum on Mon Jun 13, 2016 6:14 am, edited 2 times in total.

Author: 1 SC and 56+ GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
GenSec (24 Dec 2021 –); posts not official unless so indicated
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Twice-commended toxic villainous globalist kittehs

User avatar
Wrapper
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6020
Founded: Antiquity
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wrapper » Mon Jun 13, 2016 6:22 am

Well, that's the way it comes across sometimes. And no, there is nothing wrong with this format. The bolding is perfectly fine, and there are only two active clauses, what's the point of numbering them?

In any case, the "Mandates" clause does clearly violate the House of Cards rule.

User avatar
Losthaven
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 393
Founded: Dec 31, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Losthaven » Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:19 pm

You could quite easily remedy the house of cards problem by just changing the wording of the last clause like this:

Mandates that member nations recognize the mental wellbeing of an individual as a health issue, granting people suffering from mental health problems the same rights and treatments outlined by General Assembly Resolution #31 guaranteed to any individual suffering from a health or medical condition by national or international law.


I'm not entirely sure this duplicates the International Psychiatry Act, as this feels like a more general law encouraging awareness and expanding the protections of mentally ill people to those generally available to medical patients and beyond the specific guarantees of the IPA. (mmmm... IPA...)
Last edited by Losthaven on Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Once a great nation, a true superpower; now just watching the world go by

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 12659
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:21 pm

Losthaven wrote:You could quite easily remedy the house of cards problem by just changing the wording of the last clause like this:

Mandates that member nations recognize the mental wellbeing of an individual as a health issue, granting people suffering from mental health problems the same rights and treatments outlined by General Assembly Resolution #31 guaranteed to any individual suffering from a health or medical condition by national or international law.

Yes, but if 31 GA were repealed, the resolution would not be illegal, but would be ineffectual, since no such guarantees exist in a world were 31 GA were repealed.

Author: 1 SC and 56+ GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
GenSec (24 Dec 2021 –); posts not official unless so indicated
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Twice-commended toxic villainous globalist kittehs

User avatar
Losthaven
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 393
Founded: Dec 31, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Losthaven » Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:24 pm

Imperium Anglorum wrote:
Losthaven wrote:snip*

Yes, but if 31 GA were repealed, the resolution would not be illegal, but would be ineffectual, since no such guarantees exist in a world were 31 GA were repealed.

Agreed. Just providing constructive criticism rather than merely pointing out a problem.
Last edited by Losthaven on Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Once a great nation, a true superpower; now just watching the world go by

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 12659
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:44 pm

By the way, OP, this is relevant.
Last edited by Imperium Anglorum on Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Author: 1 SC and 56+ GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
GenSec (24 Dec 2021 –); posts not official unless so indicated
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Twice-commended toxic villainous globalist kittehs

User avatar
Losthaven
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 393
Founded: Dec 31, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Losthaven » Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:52 pm

Losthaven wrote:I'm not entirely sure this duplicates the International Psychiatry Act, as this feels like a more general law encouraging awareness and expanding the protections of mentally ill people to those generally available to medical patients and beyond the specific guarantees of the IPA. (mmmm... IPA...)
Once a great nation, a true superpower; now just watching the world go by

User avatar
Separatist Peoples
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 16989
Founded: Feb 17, 2011
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Separatist Peoples » Mon Jun 13, 2016 7:34 pm

Losthaven wrote:
Losthaven wrote:I'm not entirely sure this duplicates the International Psychiatry Act, as this feels like a more general law encouraging awareness and expanding the protections of mentally ill people to those generally available to medical patients and beyond the specific guarantees of the IPA. (mmmm... IPA...)

OOC: I just gave away the last of my homebrew IPAs and that post made me sad about not having any more. :(

IC: "I don't think it's significant Duplication to merit an illegality, but it only addresses the topic in the least manner possible. I would suggest increasing the focus somewhat. Noncommunicable diseases are a major component of public health. Mental health, and especially depression, is as much a public health concern as heart disease or cancer, and is absolutely worthy of more direct action."
Last edited by Separatist Peoples on Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

His Worshipfulness, the Most Unscrupulous, Plainly Deceitful, Dissembling, Strategicly Calculating Lord GA Secretariat, Authority on All Existence, Arbiter of Right, Toxic Globalist Dog, Dark Psychic Vampire, and Chief Populist Elitist!
Separatist Peoples should RESIGN!

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 12659
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:02 pm

Losthaven wrote:
Losthaven wrote:I'm not entirely sure this duplicates the International Psychiatry Act, as this feels like a more general law encouraging awareness and expanding the protections of mentally ill people to those generally available to medical patients and beyond the specific guarantees of the IPA. (mmmm... IPA...)

*grumble grumble, editing things in without informing anyone*

Author: 1 SC and 56+ GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
GenSec (24 Dec 2021 –); posts not official unless so indicated
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Twice-commended toxic villainous globalist kittehs

User avatar
Adytus
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 441
Founded: Apr 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Adytus » Tue Jun 14, 2016 9:40 am

Separatist Peoples wrote:
Losthaven wrote:

OOC: I just gave away the last of my homebrew IPAs and that post made me sad about not having any more. :(

IC: "I don't think it's significant Duplication to merit an illegality, but it only addresses the topic in the least manner possible. I would suggest increasing the focus somewhat. Noncommunicable diseases are a major component of public health. Mental health, and especially depression, is as much a public health concern as heart disease or cancer, and is absolutely worthy of more direct action."



"Thank you for the tips and ideas, ambassadors. I will do research, take another look or three of the rules, and bring a different draft to the assembly for discussion."
Necromancer of Arbitration
In Lazarus


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads