Zacherie wrote:Drasnia wrote:Yuno is saying that Predator was a closely guarded secret. A person who piled a couple times, was never on chat, etc. should never have gotten access to the files. Thus either it's not true that he actually had the files to Predator or there was a breach in Predator's security that should never have happened.Christian Democrats wrote:Texasa got confused because he had the NS++ browser extension and Predator on his computer, not knowing what they were for. There was a breach in Predator's security, or the script was more widely distributed than DEN has acknowledged.
Predator wasn't a closely guarded secret, but the files were kept within TBR, and the same likely applied to DEN.
Additionally, he would have had to get cleared by Halcones, and assuming that practices did not change, you had to be at least a lieutenant to gain access.
Even if he got the files, he wouldn't have been able to use it anyway. He'd just get a box telling him he's not a registered user.
Is Predator not an executable file (exe)? Could someone not have downloaded it and put it somewhere else on the internet?
I know that I've shared .exe files via telegram and forum PM.
Gest II wrote:Christian Democrats wrote:It depends on what you mean by "using" Predator. In Right to Life, we've talked with Texasa. Somebody in DEN privately gave Texasa access to Predator or leaked the illegal script to him, but Texasa didn't know what it was for or how to operate it.
This is impossible as he didn't talk to anyone in the region. He didn't have Skype and he didn't raid. He just made two posts on the forum and then vanished. If you keep interrogating this guy he's going to confess to being at the grassy knoll.
Texasa isn't an idiot, and Sedge says that he "confirmed the details" of Texasa's alleged use. I assume this means that Texasa inadvertently accessed NS's servers with Predator and that the admins confirmed this on an IP check.