Northern Freikur wrote:Grenartia wrote:
1. Who gives a fuck about the safety of trans people, amirite?
2. Reality has a well-known liberal bias, as we all know. So really, the schools are quite centrist when it comes to reality.
1. Read. My. Sig. Then as yourself why I, of all people, would call for something which oppresses people outside the gender binary.
2. What I said was meant as a guideline to distinguish between legitimate identities and transphobic "jokes" like the attack helicopter meme.
3. So, you'd be perfectly fine with this guy in a women's locker room? After all, he was born with a vagina (and most transmen don't opt for bottom surgery due to its inadequacies), so he obviously belongs with fellow vagina owners.
4. Gender isn't biological, its psychological.
Good luck convincing your fellow conservatives to spend tax money on a 3rd restroom in every public building.
1. And? This generation is capable of the same thing.
2. Non sequitur.
3. Fallacy of relative privation.
4. So you have no problem with us being beaten, raped, and/or killed? To say nothing of the fact that you want men in a women's locker room, all the while, screaming and hollering against transwomen in the same room? You make no sense whatsoever.
Allow me to say that you all keep committing Strawman Fallacies.
I never have supported locker room idea.
I'm done with this. People keep misinterpreting my posts, and I see that the only way to preserve common sense, is to drive a rift between it and leftism.
Ok, Now I'm off...
If so many have misinterpreted your posts then maybe you should do a better job of explaining them. Here is your chance. Explain exactly what you mean by the posts you have made.