Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:"Gameplay" is also a Rule 4 violation. Basically anything that identifies NationStates as a game is against the rules.
Though you could have asked this in the proposal thread.
Okay
Thought it was closed :\
Advertisement
by Sacarap » Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:57 pm
Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:"Gameplay" is also a Rule 4 violation. Basically anything that identifies NationStates as a game is against the rules.
Though you could have asked this in the proposal thread.
by The Great Destruction » Tue Aug 04, 2015 9:32 pm
by Bears Armed » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:40 am
The Great Destruction wrote:I am sorry if this was asked in the last 14 pages.
May a nation that is no longer in existence be the target of a Commendation/Condemnation? Would this apply only to Former nations, or would this also apply to Acient nations. And if Ancient nations are targetable, how do they get distinguished from a new nation using the name involved.
Also what happens if an already CorC'ed nation becomes ancient and a new nation is created with the same name. Does it inherit the badge even if it was an accident or chance and not related to the previously named region?
by The Great Destruction » Wed Aug 05, 2015 6:41 am
by The Great Destruction » Mon Aug 10, 2015 8:32 pm
by Crazy girl » Tue Sep 15, 2015 11:33 am
by We Are Not the NSA » Wed Oct 14, 2015 6:27 am
1. Acknowledging that the queen of Melchandious could be a great leader to her people,
Raiding History | Security Council | Dear Natives | TWP Raid |
by We Are Not the NSA » Wed Oct 14, 2015 9:18 am
Sedgistan wrote:If you're clearly referring to an RPed character within a nation, it's fine to use personal pronouns for them.
Raiding History | Security Council | Dear Natives | TWP Raid |
by Phydios » Thu Nov 05, 2015 8:50 pm
Gribbland wrote:How do I approve of a proposal?
If you claim to be religious but don’t control your tongue, you are fooling yourself, and your religion is worthless. Pure and genuine religion in the sight of God the Father means caring for orphans and widows in their distress and refusing to let the world corrupt you. | Not everyone who calls out to me, ‘Lord! Lord!’ will enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Only those who actually do the will of my Father in heaven will enter. On judgment day many will say to me, ‘Lord! Lord! We prophesied in your name and cast out demons in your name and performed many miracles in your name.’ But I will reply, ‘I never knew you. Get away from me, you who break God’s laws.’James 1:26-27, Matthew 7:21-23
by Sedgistan » Mon Dec 14, 2015 2:24 am
1. Is the term something that could be applied to real-world nations. If yes, then fine. If no, see #2.
2. Is the term something that could be applied to the NationStates world? If yes, see point 3, if no, then what on earth are you writing about?
3. Is the term referring to NationStates as a game, or to the people behind the nations? If yes, it's not acceptable. If no, it's fine.
by Unibot III » Mon Dec 14, 2015 2:58 am
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by The Blaatschapen » Mon Dec 14, 2015 9:10 am
Unibot III wrote:I officially declare the 3WB fight against the WA to be over.
*errupts into singing*
So here it is,
Merry Christmas.
Everybody's having fun!
Look to the future now
It's only just begun!!!
I'm just glad I didn't have to create an interregional treaty called "the Feeders" to circumvent the rule using precedent from one of Ard's dusty old rulings on organizational names that otherwise would violate Rule IV. You would have had to create Rule V to stop me.
by Unibot III » Mon Dec 14, 2015 1:21 pm
The Blaatschapen wrote:Unibot III wrote:I officially declare the 3WB fight against the WA to be over.
*errupts into singing*
So here it is,
Merry Christmas.
Everybody's having fun!
Look to the future now
It's only just begun!!!
I'm just glad I didn't have to create an interregional treaty called "the Feeders" to circumvent the rule using precedent from one of Ard's dusty old rulings on organizational names that otherwise would violate Rule IV. You would have had to create Rule V to stop me.
Considering that this feeder/sinker illegality was in place for years, you took your sweet time to potentially circumvent it
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Unibot III » Mon Dec 14, 2015 1:29 pm
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Pierconium » Thu Apr 07, 2016 12:27 pm
by An Enforcer » Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:31 am
by An Enforcer » Sun Apr 10, 2016 10:45 am
by WikiPlay » Wed Jul 13, 2016 10:40 am
Pierconium wrote:Can we add a rule stipulating at least minimal correct spelling requirements?
by Crazy girl » Wed Jul 13, 2016 12:46 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ever-Wandering Souls, Kenmoria
Advertisement