NATION

PASSWORD

Why Should Muslims Be Allowed In the West?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Striton
Envoy
 
Posts: 252
Founded: Oct 31, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Striton » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:27 pm

Why should you be allowed in the West, OP?
Most of the opinions expressed on this account are regrettable, horrendously misinformed, and downright reprehensible. I am retracting them all.

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22872
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:27 pm

Mega City 5 wrote:
Geilinor wrote:Are you against the amount of immigration or the existence of Muslims in the West?


I'm against the very existence of Islam in the West. History tells us that Islam is dangerous. Muslims are dangerous. They have always been and continue to be a threat against the West.

You deny this? Open up a history book.

But let's ignore this. Even barring that, is it wise to let so many uneducated Muslims from the Middle East, in which these sorts of crimes are very common, into the West?

Is it really surprising that Europe is going to Hell in a hand-basket because of these people?

*clears throat*

I'm against the very existence of Christianity in the West. History tells us that Christianity is dangerous. Christians are dangerous. They have always been and continue to be a threat against the West.

You deny this? Open up a history book.

But let's ignore this. Even barring that, is it wise to let so many uneducated Christians into the West?

Is it really surprising that Europe is going to Hell in a hand-basket because of these people?

[/sarcasm]
While she had no regrets about throwing the lever to douse her husband's mistress in molten gold, Blanche did feel a pang of conscience for the innocent bystanders whose proximity had caused them to suffer gilt by association.

King of Snark, Real Piece of Work, Metabolizer of Oxygen, Old Man from The East Pacific, by the Malevolence of Her Infinite Terribleness Catherine Gratwick the Sole and True Claimant to the Bears Armed Vacancy, Protector of the Realm

User avatar
Kubra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17203
Founded: Apr 15, 2006
Father Knows Best State

Postby Kubra » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:28 pm

Mega City 5 wrote:
Geilinor wrote:Are you against the amount of immigration or the existence of Muslims in the West?


I'm against the very existence of Islam in the West. History tells us that Islam is dangerous. Muslims are dangerous. They have always been and continue to be a threat against the West.

You deny this? Open up a history book.

But let's ignore this. Even barring that, is it wise to let so many uneducated Muslims from the Middle East, in which these sorts of crimes are very common, into the West?

Is it really surprising that Europe is going to Hell in a hand-basket because of these people?
lol if we gonna go with something as vague as "history" as westerners are pretty much the best motherfuckers at killing on the planet, especially each other
if anything, we should be outbred by muslims, if that's our metric.
Last edited by Kubra on Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
“Atomic war is inevitable. It will destroy half of humanity: it is going to destroy immense human riches. It is very possible. The atomic war is going to provoke a true inferno on Earth. But it will not impede Communism.”
Comrade J. Posadas

User avatar
Jochistan
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9390
Founded: Nov 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Jochistan » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:28 pm

Grinning Dragon wrote:
The Orson Empire wrote:Saying all Muslims should be banned from a certain country is racist. You cannot generalize an entire ethic group based on the actions of a few bad apples.

moslem is a race?

No. But let's face it, Tartars, Bosniaks, Albanians (and many Persians and Turks if they dressed in nice enough suits) would remain untouched by far righters as long as they never brought it up.

And saying any major religion that varied needs to be removed is pretty over the top
Your friendly neighborhood Steppe Republic.
I was a wimp before Nationstates, now I'm a jerk and everybody loves me.

Pro: Moral Conservatism, Nationalism, Rationalism, Theocracy, Traditionalism, Golden Age of Islam, Corporal and Capital Punishment, Ethnic Mixing, Integration, Stranka Demokratske Akcije, Kosovo, Tibet, Ichkeria, el Sisi.
Anti: Salafism, Khomeinism, Racial Ultranationalism, Xenophobic Populism, Progressivism, Communism, Hedonism, Pacifism, Multiculturalism, Nihilism, Israel, Hamas, Serbia and friends, China.
Genghis did nothing wrong

User avatar
New confederate ramenia
Minister
 
Posts: 2987
Founded: Oct 07, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby New confederate ramenia » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:28 pm

MacFee wrote:
New confederate ramenia wrote:The issues with Islam in Europe are caused by the way liberal European governments handle Muslims. And any reasonable person should accept that argument from the NRA, because it's entirely valid.

Not all immigration is illegal immigration.


Well obviously, but can't we at least let the Arab Christians in?

Of course we should.
probando

User avatar
Mega City 5
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1162
Founded: Sep 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Mega City 5 » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:29 pm

Galloism wrote:eh, dunno.

Of course, I'm not sure how you test it someone's Muslim or not. Make them eat pork maybe?


I propose a "Muslim shibboleth" test:

Give the immigrant a beer and a bacon cheeseburger and make sure that he consumes them both. Further demand that he burn a Quran and call Mohammad a disgusting child rapist.

He does those things? Let him in.

He refuses to do at least 2 out of 4 of those things? Summary execution.
Last edited by Mega City 5 on Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:33 pm, edited 5 times in total.

User avatar
Kubra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17203
Founded: Apr 15, 2006
Father Knows Best State

Postby Kubra » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:29 pm

MacFee wrote:
New confederate ramenia wrote:The issues with Islam in Europe are caused by the way liberal European governments handle Muslims. And any reasonable person should accept that argument from the NRA, because it's entirely valid.

Not all immigration is illegal immigration.


Well obviously, but can't we at least let the Arab Christians in?
why on earth would you wana let arab christians in?
“Atomic war is inevitable. It will destroy half of humanity: it is going to destroy immense human riches. It is very possible. The atomic war is going to provoke a true inferno on Earth. But it will not impede Communism.”
Comrade J. Posadas

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11113
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:30 pm

Nariterrr wrote:Yes. I do not want to unconstitutionally restrict people from going places. Let them go wherever they want to. Free country.

How does someone have Constitutional protections if they are immigrating TO the United States?

User avatar
Distruzio
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24223
Founded: Feb 28, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Distruzio » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:30 pm

New confederate ramenia wrote:
MacFee wrote:
Well obviously, but can't we at least let the Arab Christians in?

Of course we should.


Seconded.
Eastern Orthodox Christian
Christ is King
Glorify Him

capitalism is not natural
secularism is not neutral
liberalism is not tolerant

User avatar
Distruzio
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24223
Founded: Feb 28, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Distruzio » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:31 pm

Mega City 5 wrote:
Galloism wrote:eh, dunno.

Of course, I'm not sure how you test it someone's Muslim or not. Make them eat pork maybe?


I propose a "Muslim shibboleth" test:

Give the Muslim a beer and a bacon cheeseburger and make sure that he consumes them both. Further demand that he burn a Quran and call Mohammad a disgusting child rapist.

He does those things? Let him in.

He refuses to do at least 3 out of 5 of those things? Summary execution.


Amend that. Immediately.
Last edited by Distruzio on Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Eastern Orthodox Christian
Christ is King
Glorify Him

capitalism is not natural
secularism is not neutral
liberalism is not tolerant

User avatar
Terminus Alpha
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1626
Founded: Jan 10, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Terminus Alpha » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:31 pm

Mega City 5 wrote:
The Orson Empire wrote:Saying all Muslims should be banned from a certain country is racist. You cannot generalize an entire ethic group based on the actions of a few bad apples.


Forgive me if I'm not particularly convinced by your cries of "racism."

The effects/consequences of Islamic immigration, the impact of letting Muslims into Europe and the US is undeniable.

Again, I repeat:

Sweden is the rape capital of Europe. It would be the rape capital of the world, but South Africa, I believe, currently holds that title.

And again:

Do you accept that argument from the NRA?


First off - I now have "sex crimes per capita" in my search history.

Anyway, you point about the ebil mooslim hivemind raping all of Sweden is moot because:

1. "In Sweden there has been this ambition explicitly to record every case of sexual violence separately, to make it visible in the statistics"
2. It's definition of rape is different that other countries.

Mega City 5 wrote:
Geilinor wrote:Are you against the amount of immigration or the existence of Muslims in the West?


I'm against the very existence of Islam in the West. History tells us that Islam is dangerous. Muslims are dangerous. They have always been and continue to be a threat against the West.

You deny this? Open up a history book.

But let's ignore this. Even barring that, is it wise to let so many uneducated Muslims from the Middle East, in which these sorts of crimes are very common, into the West?

Is it really surprising that Europe is going to Hell in a hand-basket because of these people?


Al-Andalus don't real. Muslim Golden Age don't real. Algebra don't real. Our numerical system don't real.

History is way more complex than the clash of civilizations model that you think in. Pretty much every event has nuance.
RP Interests: Alt-Hist, Space, 20th Century onward.
In the process of becoming a History teacher.
Center-Left-Libertarian | "Dirty filthy hippie"
Agnostic Atheist
Democrat
LGBT+

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 73175
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:32 pm

Mega City 5 wrote:
Galloism wrote:eh, dunno.

Of course, I'm not sure how you test it someone's Muslim or not. Make them eat pork maybe?


I propose a "Muslim shibboleth" test:

Give the Muslim a beer and a bacon cheeseburger and make sure that he consumes them both. Further demand that he burn a Quran and call Mohammad a disgusting child rapist.

He does those things? Let him in.

He refuses to do at least 3 out of 5 of those things? Summary execution.

What kind of beer and where's the cheeseburger from?

*I* might fail the test depending on your answers.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Mega City 5
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1162
Founded: Sep 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Mega City 5 » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:32 pm

Distruzio wrote:Amend that. Immediately.


I'm proposing this as a measure for the State to take. I see no reason to amend it.
Last edited by Mega City 5 on Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Distruzio
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24223
Founded: Feb 28, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Distruzio » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:33 pm

Mega City 5 wrote:
Distruzio wrote:Amend that. Immediately.


I'm proposing this as a measure for the State to take. I see no reason to amend it.


It walks a dangerous line towards violating site rules.
Eastern Orthodox Christian
Christ is King
Glorify Him

capitalism is not natural
secularism is not neutral
liberalism is not tolerant

User avatar
Crockerland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5456
Founded: Oct 15, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Crockerland » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:34 pm

The Orson Empire wrote:Saying all Muslims should be banned from a certain country is racist. You cannot generalize an entire ethic group based on the actions of a few bad apples.

Good thing muslim isn't an ethnic group then.
Free Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Tibet.
Gay not Queer / Why Abortion is Genocide / End Gay Erasure
PROUD SUPPORTER OF:
National Liberalism, Nuclear & Geothermal Power, GMOs, Vaccines, Biodiesel, LGBTIA equality, Universal Healthcare, Universal Basic Income, Constitutional Carry, Emotional Support Twinks, Right to Life


User avatar
Mega City 5
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1162
Founded: Sep 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Mega City 5 » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:34 pm

Galloism wrote:What kind of beer and where's the cheeseburger from?

*I* might fail the test depending on your answers.


Are you willing to burn a Quran and call Mohammad a disgusting child rapist?

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:34 pm

you know what? fuck it. consider my fucks officially fully expended. are you from the country that regularly has mass shootings? (or at least, much more than every other country? and more shootings in general?) a country that has the same murder rate as us... but only when we're in the middle of an honest to god civil war? give me one good reason why i shouldn't ban the hell out of people from the united states from coming here, right now, it's pretty fucking clear from the statistics that people from that country pose a higher threat of violence, rape and murder. you can go "b-but but but" or "but we're rich and white!" but as the right-wing loves to say, the statistics don't lie.

and don't give me this pish about how oh the muslims are worse. remember that fucking civil war? yeah, it seems like most of the funding and weapons dried up after 9/11. i wonder why that was? oh, wait, the united states was one of the main sources of political and material support for one of the most prolific terrorist grounds in this country's history? banned banned banned. and that's not even getting into direct political meddling and all the damaging ideologies that have been imported from there.

i mean, i guess we could go along with banning the muslims, but please be 100% aware that you're getting banned as well. i'd be fucking insane not to.

i assume you're american based on your use of liberals. if you're not, then i apologize. american cultural influence has overtaken our own to the point our political terms have been replaced by theirs to the point that people sound like americans and talk like amerincns using american political terms and fighting american political battles without even knowing. just yet another reason they must be banned.
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Luminesa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 61235
Founded: Dec 09, 2014
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Luminesa » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:34 pm

Mega City 5 wrote:
Galloism wrote:eh, dunno.

Of course, I'm not sure how you test it someone's Muslim or not. Make them eat pork maybe?


I propose a "Muslim shibboleth" test:

Give the immigrant a beer and a bacon cheeseburger and make sure that he consumes them both. Further demand that he burn a Quran and call Mohammad a disgusting child rapist.

He does those things? Let him in.

He refuses to do at least 3 out of 5 of those things? Summary execution.


That's a violation of the First Amendment. You can't force anyone to burn their holy book or to stuff food down their throat.

And SUMMARY EXECUTION?!?!?!

Yes, because summary execution is definitely not what ISIS does on a daily basis.
Catholic, pro-life, and proud of it. I prefer my debates on religion, politics, and sports with some coffee and a little Aquinas and G.K. CHESTERTON here and there. :3
Unofficial #1 fan of the Who Dat Nation.
"I'm just a singer of simple songs, I'm not a real political man. I watch CNN, but I'm not sure I can tell you the difference in Iraq and Iran. But I know Jesus, and I talk to God, and I remember this from when I was young:
faith, hope and love are some good things He gave us...
and the greatest is love."
-Alan Jackson
Help the Ukrainian people, here's some sources!
Help bring home First Nation girls! Now with more ways to help!
Jesus loves all of His children in Eastern Europe - pray for peace.
Pray for Ukraine, Wear Sunflowers In Your Hair

User avatar
Kubra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17203
Founded: Apr 15, 2006
Father Knows Best State

Postby Kubra » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:34 pm

Mega City 5 wrote:
Galloism wrote:eh, dunno.

Of course, I'm not sure how you test it someone's Muslim or not. Make them eat pork maybe?


I propose a "Muslim shibboleth" test:

Give the immigrant a beer and a bacon cheeseburger and make sure that he consumes them both. Further demand that he burn a Quran and call Mohammad a disgusting child rapist.

He does those things? Let him in.

He refuses to do at least 2 out of 4 of those things? Summary execution.
I don't get it
is making this sort of thread some sort of ritual sudoku when ones gets tired of the forums?
“Atomic war is inevitable. It will destroy half of humanity: it is going to destroy immense human riches. It is very possible. The atomic war is going to provoke a true inferno on Earth. But it will not impede Communism.”
Comrade J. Posadas

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:34 pm

Mega City 5 wrote:
Galloism wrote:What kind of beer and where's the cheeseburger from?

*I* might fail the test depending on your answers.


Are you willing to burn a Quran and call Mohammad a disgusting child rapist?

I'm not him, but no, I'm not willing to.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
MacFee
Envoy
 
Posts: 206
Founded: Dec 19, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby MacFee » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:35 pm

Wallenburg wrote:
Mega City 5 wrote:Why do liberals think that it's a good idea to permit Muslims to immigrate into the West in such massive numbers?

Because their homes, livelihoods, and families are being destroyed.
Conservatives have been insisting, over and over again, that if we let in Muslims into the US and Europe, we are going to see more crime, more terrorism, and more problems for us.

And they have supplied zero evidence for that.
The liberals, of course, seem to think that this won't happen, and imply that we are bigots and racists for even thinking that.

Well, I'd like to see how that isn't bigoted or racist, considering "Muslim" is being equated with "Arab" and vice versa.
Well, lo and behold, there are more and more Muslims in Europe, and we are seeing more and more crime, more rape, and a whole bunch of other problems that didn't use to be there. Sweden is the rape capital of Europe because of Muslims.

I don't see a rise in crime. And I'd like to see a study tying rape in Sweden to Muslim immigration.
And when we point out things like this, liberals seem to have no coherent answer for us. The most that you people can muster is: "But it's only a small minority. Most of them aren't like that. If you want to get rid of all of them because of the actions of a few, then you are a racist!"

Well, that is racist. Care to explain how it isn't?
Meanwhile, of course, they would never accept this argument from the NRA: "But only a small minority of guns are used for illegal activities. Most gun owners are responsible. If you want to pass stricter laws for all gun-owners because of the actions of a few, then you are anti-freedom, anti-self defense and anti-constitution!"

I accept that.
The simple fact is this:

"Small minority" or not, Europe (and soon, I bet, the US) is facing problems that it didn't have to face before, and the cause of these problems is Islamic immigration.

[citation needed]
They need to get out and stay out. Period. End of story.

:rofl: Including Muslim citizens?
You disagree with me? Then that just tells me that you value this "diversity" liberal nonsense more than you actually value law, order and safety.

"If you disagree with me, you're an idiot!" isn't a very convincing argument.
So, again, I ask you:

Why do you think this is a good idea? What are your arguments in favor of this?

Because their homes, livelihoods, and families are being destroyed.


We can deport them. And we should. Because it says in the Koran that you can have four wives, own slaves, rape children under the age of ten, behead nonbelievers, and smoke hashish. And they still do all that. Unlike most American WASPS, they still obey their religious tenants with a fanaticism unheard of in the civilized world.
The Commies are EVERYWHERE!

User avatar
Mega City 5
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1162
Founded: Sep 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Mega City 5 » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:35 pm

Distruzio wrote:
Mega City 5 wrote:
I'm proposing this as a measure for the State to take. I see no reason to amend it.


It walks a dangerous line towards violating site rules.


If a country has a law forbidding Xs from entering a country, and an X, being aware of this, is attempting to lie in order to get into that country, he is committing a crime.

If saying that a criminal should be executed is against the site rules, then I couldn't care less whether or not I'm violating them.

User avatar
Nilla Wayfarers
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1223
Founded: Apr 04, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Nilla Wayfarers » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:35 pm

Distruzio wrote:
Mega City 5 wrote:
I'm proposing this as a measure for the State to take. I see no reason to amend it.


It walks a dangerous line towards violating site rules.

I already reported it, in case you were wondering.
Our country is the world--our countrymen are mankind.
WA Delegate for Liberationists (Ambassador Oscar Mondelez).

For: good things
Against: bad things

Economic Left/Right: -4.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.54

Want to make the WA more democratic? Show your support here.
The Greatest GA Resolution Author Ever wrote:Due to more of the Econmy using computers instead of Paper The Manufactoring for paper prducts shpuld decrease because were wasting rescources on paper ad more paper is being thrown in the trash

User avatar
Crockerland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5456
Founded: Oct 15, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Crockerland » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:36 pm

Alyakia wrote:you know what? fuck it. consider my fucks officially fully expended. are you from the country that regularly has mass shootings? (or at least, much more than every other country? and more shootings in general?) a country that has the same murder rate as us... but only when we're in the middle of an honest to god civil war? give me one good reason why i shouldn't ban the hell out of people from the united states from coming here, right now, it's pretty fucking clear from the statistics that people from that country pose a higher threat of violence, rape and murder. you can go "b-but but but" or "but we're rich and white!" but as the right-wing loves to say, the statistics don't lie.

Please point to the verse in the united states holybook that calls citizens of the United States to commit mass shootings or murder people and I will gladly agree with your proposed ban.
Free Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Tibet.
Gay not Queer / Why Abortion is Genocide / End Gay Erasure
PROUD SUPPORTER OF:
National Liberalism, Nuclear & Geothermal Power, GMOs, Vaccines, Biodiesel, LGBTIA equality, Universal Healthcare, Universal Basic Income, Constitutional Carry, Emotional Support Twinks, Right to Life


User avatar
Striton
Envoy
 
Posts: 252
Founded: Oct 31, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Striton » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:36 pm

The OP is suggesting that the U.S. become a terrorist regime. I say no.
Most of the opinions expressed on this account are regrettable, horrendously misinformed, and downright reprehensible. I am retracting them all.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alvecia, Ariddia, Cerula, Dumb Ideologies, East Leaf Republic, Ifreann, Omphalos, Pasong Tirad, Republics of the Solar Union, Shearoa

Advertisement

Remove ads