Advertisement
by Wallenburg » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:27 pm
Mega City 5 wrote:Geilinor wrote:Are you against the amount of immigration or the existence of Muslims in the West?
I'm against the very existence of Islam in the West. History tells us that Islam is dangerous. Muslims are dangerous. They have always been and continue to be a threat against the West.
You deny this? Open up a history book.
But let's ignore this. Even barring that, is it wise to let so many uneducated Muslims from the Middle East, in which these sorts of crimes are very common, into the West?
Is it really surprising that Europe is going to Hell in a hand-basket because of these people?
by Kubra » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:28 pm
lol if we gonna go with something as vague as "history" as westerners are pretty much the best motherfuckers at killing on the planet, especially each otherMega City 5 wrote:Geilinor wrote:Are you against the amount of immigration or the existence of Muslims in the West?
I'm against the very existence of Islam in the West. History tells us that Islam is dangerous. Muslims are dangerous. They have always been and continue to be a threat against the West.
You deny this? Open up a history book.
But let's ignore this. Even barring that, is it wise to let so many uneducated Muslims from the Middle East, in which these sorts of crimes are very common, into the West?
Is it really surprising that Europe is going to Hell in a hand-basket because of these people?
by Jochistan » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:28 pm
by New confederate ramenia » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:28 pm
MacFee wrote:New confederate ramenia wrote:The issues with Islam in Europe are caused by the way liberal European governments handle Muslims. And any reasonable person should accept that argument from the NRA, because it's entirely valid.
Not all immigration is illegal immigration.
Well obviously, but can't we at least let the Arab Christians in?
by Mega City 5 » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:29 pm
Galloism wrote:eh, dunno.
Of course, I'm not sure how you test it someone's Muslim or not. Make them eat pork maybe?
by Kubra » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:29 pm
why on earth would you wana let arab christians in?MacFee wrote:New confederate ramenia wrote:The issues with Islam in Europe are caused by the way liberal European governments handle Muslims. And any reasonable person should accept that argument from the NRA, because it's entirely valid.
Not all immigration is illegal immigration.
Well obviously, but can't we at least let the Arab Christians in?
by Grinning Dragon » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:30 pm
Nariterrr wrote:Yes. I do not want to unconstitutionally restrict people from going places. Let them go wherever they want to. Free country.
by Distruzio » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:31 pm
Mega City 5 wrote:Galloism wrote:eh, dunno.
Of course, I'm not sure how you test it someone's Muslim or not. Make them eat pork maybe?
I propose a "Muslim shibboleth" test:
Give the Muslim a beer and a bacon cheeseburger and make sure that he consumes them both. Further demand that he burn a Quran and call Mohammad a disgusting child rapist.
He does those things? Let him in.
He refuses to do at least 3 out of 5 of those things? Summary execution.
by Terminus Alpha » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:31 pm
Mega City 5 wrote:The Orson Empire wrote:Saying all Muslims should be banned from a certain country is racist. You cannot generalize an entire ethic group based on the actions of a few bad apples.
Forgive me if I'm not particularly convinced by your cries of "racism."
The effects/consequences of Islamic immigration, the impact of letting Muslims into Europe and the US is undeniable.
Again, I repeat:
Sweden is the rape capital of Europe. It would be the rape capital of the world, but South Africa, I believe, currently holds that title.
And again:
Do you accept that argument from the NRA?
Mega City 5 wrote:Geilinor wrote:Are you against the amount of immigration or the existence of Muslims in the West?
I'm against the very existence of Islam in the West. History tells us that Islam is dangerous. Muslims are dangerous. They have always been and continue to be a threat against the West.
You deny this? Open up a history book.
But let's ignore this. Even barring that, is it wise to let so many uneducated Muslims from the Middle East, in which these sorts of crimes are very common, into the West?
Is it really surprising that Europe is going to Hell in a hand-basket because of these people?
by Galloism » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:32 pm
Mega City 5 wrote:Galloism wrote:eh, dunno.
Of course, I'm not sure how you test it someone's Muslim or not. Make them eat pork maybe?
I propose a "Muslim shibboleth" test:
Give the Muslim a beer and a bacon cheeseburger and make sure that he consumes them both. Further demand that he burn a Quran and call Mohammad a disgusting child rapist.
He does those things? Let him in.
He refuses to do at least 3 out of 5 of those things? Summary execution.
by Mega City 5 » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:32 pm
Distruzio wrote:Amend that. Immediately.
by Distruzio » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:33 pm
by Crockerland » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:34 pm
The Orson Empire wrote:Saying all Muslims should be banned from a certain country is racist. You cannot generalize an entire ethic group based on the actions of a few bad apples.
by Mega City 5 » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:34 pm
Galloism wrote:What kind of beer and where's the cheeseburger from?
*I* might fail the test depending on your answers.
by Alyakia » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:34 pm
by Luminesa » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:34 pm
Mega City 5 wrote:Galloism wrote:eh, dunno.
Of course, I'm not sure how you test it someone's Muslim or not. Make them eat pork maybe?
I propose a "Muslim shibboleth" test:
Give the immigrant a beer and a bacon cheeseburger and make sure that he consumes them both. Further demand that he burn a Quran and call Mohammad a disgusting child rapist.
He does those things? Let him in.
He refuses to do at least 3 out of 5 of those things? Summary execution.
by Kubra » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:34 pm
I don't get itMega City 5 wrote:Galloism wrote:eh, dunno.
Of course, I'm not sure how you test it someone's Muslim or not. Make them eat pork maybe?
I propose a "Muslim shibboleth" test:
Give the immigrant a beer and a bacon cheeseburger and make sure that he consumes them both. Further demand that he burn a Quran and call Mohammad a disgusting child rapist.
He does those things? Let him in.
He refuses to do at least 2 out of 4 of those things? Summary execution.
by Geilinor » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:34 pm
by MacFee » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:35 pm
Wallenburg wrote:Mega City 5 wrote:Why do liberals think that it's a good idea to permit Muslims to immigrate into the West in such massive numbers?
Because their homes, livelihoods, and families are being destroyed.Conservatives have been insisting, over and over again, that if we let in Muslims into the US and Europe, we are going to see more crime, more terrorism, and more problems for us.
And they have supplied zero evidence for that.The liberals, of course, seem to think that this won't happen, and imply that we are bigots and racists for even thinking that.
Well, I'd like to see how that isn't bigoted or racist, considering "Muslim" is being equated with "Arab" and vice versa.Well, lo and behold, there are more and more Muslims in Europe, and we are seeing more and more crime, more rape, and a whole bunch of other problems that didn't use to be there. Sweden is the rape capital of Europe because of Muslims.
I don't see a rise in crime. And I'd like to see a study tying rape in Sweden to Muslim immigration.And when we point out things like this, liberals seem to have no coherent answer for us. The most that you people can muster is: "But it's only a small minority. Most of them aren't like that. If you want to get rid of all of them because of the actions of a few, then you are a racist!"
Well, that is racist. Care to explain how it isn't?Meanwhile, of course, they would never accept this argument from the NRA: "But only a small minority of guns are used for illegal activities. Most gun owners are responsible. If you want to pass stricter laws for all gun-owners because of the actions of a few, then you are anti-freedom, anti-self defense and anti-constitution!"
I accept that.The simple fact is this:
"Small minority" or not, Europe (and soon, I bet, the US) is facing problems that it didn't have to face before, and the cause of these problems is Islamic immigration.
[citation needed]They need to get out and stay out. Period. End of story.
Including Muslim citizens?You disagree with me? Then that just tells me that you value this "diversity" liberal nonsense more than you actually value law, order and safety.
"If you disagree with me, you're an idiot!" isn't a very convincing argument.So, again, I ask you:
Why do you think this is a good idea? What are your arguments in favor of this?
Because their homes, livelihoods, and families are being destroyed.
by Mega City 5 » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:35 pm
by Nilla Wayfarers » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:35 pm
The Greatest GA Resolution Author Ever wrote:Due to more of the Econmy using computers instead of Paper The Manufactoring for paper prducts shpuld decrease because were wasting rescources on paper ad more paper is being thrown in the trash
by Crockerland » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:36 pm
Alyakia wrote:you know what? fuck it. consider my fucks officially fully expended. are you from the country that regularly has mass shootings? (or at least, much more than every other country? and more shootings in general?) a country that has the same murder rate as us... but only when we're in the middle of an honest to god civil war? give me one good reason why i shouldn't ban the hell out of people from the united states from coming here, right now, it's pretty fucking clear from the statistics that people from that country pose a higher threat of violence, rape and murder. you can go "b-but but but" or "but we're rich and white!" but as the right-wing loves to say, the statistics don't lie.
by Striton » Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:36 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Alvecia, Ariddia, Cerula, Dumb Ideologies, East Leaf Republic, Ifreann, Omphalos, Pasong Tirad, Republics of the Solar Union, Shearoa
Advertisement