Advertisement
by Cora II » Sun Oct 18, 2015 2:31 am
by Flanderlion » Sun Nov 15, 2015 6:20 pm
by United Provinces of Atlantica » Tue Nov 17, 2015 6:08 pm
by New Stellonia » Sun Dec 06, 2015 2:08 pm
by YoriZ » Wed Mar 09, 2016 3:44 pm
Flanderlion wrote:If the Custodian Proposal is pretty much giving a permanent (until a repeal - which should pass at 50% compared to the 75% needed for the initial proposal) shouldn't it be like a normal proposal - rather than making it quicker and easier than other proposals.
So this would work with both older style (no founder ever) regions, like Nationstates, and newer (founder CTEd) regions, but if the original founder returns, the Custodian position is rendered inactive.
I think this change has potential. I personally don't like the SC, but I do see that the SC is by far the best option for this. Either 66% or 75% of the vote, (I'm voting for the latter), to grant a region an Custodian, and 50% to repeal a Custodian. A Custodian is a Founder, with all the rights and privileges of a Founder, and the region acts as if it is a Foundered region, until the SC decides to repeal the Custodian initiative.
by Eluvatar » Wed Mar 09, 2016 9:36 pm
YoriZ wrote:Flanderlion wrote:If the Custodian Proposal is pretty much giving a permanent (until a repeal - which should pass at 50% compared to the 75% needed for the initial proposal) shouldn't it be like a normal proposal - rather than making it quicker and easier than other proposals.
So this would work with both older style (no founder ever) regions, like Nationstates, and newer (founder CTEd) regions, but if the original founder returns, the Custodian position is rendered inactive.
I think this change has potential. I personally don't like the SC, but I do see that the SC is by far the best option for this. Either 66% or 75% of the vote, (I'm voting for the latter), to grant a region an Custodian, and 50% to repeal a Custodian. A Custodian is a Founder, with all the rights and privileges of a Founder, and the region acts as if it is a Foundered region, until the SC decides to repeal the Custodian initiative.
I'm very interested in this variation of the Custodian SC Proposal.
Is there any change it might be implemented?
by Flanderlion » Wed Mar 09, 2016 11:09 pm
Eluvatar wrote:YoriZ wrote:
I'm very interested in this variation of the Custodian SC Proposal.
Is there any change it might be implemented?
Yes.
Do you have reasons to present for why allowing a Custodian free use of regional controls would be better than having them have to spend influence? (Assuming I'm interpreting Flanderlion's suggestion correctly.)
by Leppikania » Thu Mar 10, 2016 1:05 pm
Flanderlion wrote:Eluvatar wrote:Yes.
Do you have reasons to present for why allowing a Custodian free use of regional controls would be better than having them have to spend influence? (Assuming I'm interpreting Flanderlion's suggestion correctly.)
Been a while since I looked at this, but I think I was meaning at the time that the Custodian was meant to be a way for Founderless regions to opt out of R/D. I might have been back in November, but I'm not now too precious about them not using influence, as long as they have the founders powers (Executive for RO's etc.). Someone else can take up the cause if they feel strongly either way with the influence usage.
by Astrum Nigrum » Fri Mar 11, 2016 1:25 pm
Flanderlion wrote:but I think I was meaning at the time that the Custodian was meant to be a way for Founderless regions to opt out of R/D
by Flanderlion » Sat Mar 12, 2016 11:05 pm
Astrum Nigrum wrote:Flanderlion wrote:but I think I was meaning at the time that the Custodian was meant to be a way for Founderless regions to opt out of R/D
that's certainly something we could use. if the idea of the custodian can be implemented to fulfill that purpose (using influence for various actions shouldn't be a problem in most cases) i'm all for it.
by Flying Circus 6 » Thu Apr 07, 2016 6:48 am
by Zacherie » Thu Apr 07, 2016 10:04 am
by Evil Wolf » Fri Apr 08, 2016 4:31 am
Kryozerkia wrote:In the good old days raiding was illegal
Crazy Girl wrote:Invading was never illegal
[violet] wrote:There is supposed to be an invasion game.
by The Stalker » Thu Apr 14, 2016 1:59 pm
by The Stalker » Thu Nov 24, 2016 11:09 pm
by Bears Armed » Sat Nov 26, 2016 8:44 am
by Flanderlion » Sat Nov 26, 2016 8:52 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Free Land of Rebellium, Heromerland, Narvatus, Nordikea, North American Imperial State, Romanovskaya, Stairs
Advertisement