NATION

PASSWORD

English Prison System sends Transgender Woman to Male Prison

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Serksis Federation
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 435
Founded: Mar 08, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Serksis Federation » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:02 am

Alyakia wrote:
Serksis Federation wrote:

Also inmates can be put in cells alone away from others if they are at risk themselves.


if only there was an entire prison for people that were at risk for this exact reason

A prison for transgenders that did not get their gender legally reassigned and was guilty of a crime? Yeah go be an activist for that.
No Law Can Set You Free

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:03 am

Nothing more delightful than the assumption that a transgendered MtF wants to be sent to women's prison for a free peep show. On that account men's prison population should all be put in solitary on the assumption that the gays might be ogling the other male prisoners.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Serksis Federation
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 435
Founded: Mar 08, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Serksis Federation » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:04 am

Hirota wrote:
Serksis Federation wrote:Also inmates can be put in cells alone away from others if they are at risk themselves.
Solitary is typically used for both people who are a risk to others, and who are at risk from others.

Comparing her (or other potential victims of prison violence) to someone who has tried to shiv a fellow inmate isn't a constructive approach.

I didn't compare her to someone who is a risk to others, but to someone who is at risk from others.
No Law Can Set You Free

User avatar
Wisconsin9
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35753
Founded: May 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Wisconsin9 » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:04 am

Gauthier wrote:Nothing more delightful than the assumption that a transgendered MtF wants to be sent to women's prison for a free peep show. On that account men's prison population should all be put in solitary on the assumption that the gays might be ogling the other male prisoners.

Honestly, I'd almost prefer that they were arguing based on that. The lovely fellow above you thinks it's okay because there's a fucking technicality.
~~~~~~~~
We are currently 33% through the Trump administration.
................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:05 am

Serksis Federation wrote:
Alyakia wrote:
if only there was an entire prison for people that were at risk for this exact reason

A prison for transgenders that did not get their gender legally reassigned and was guilty of a crime? Yeah go be an activist for that.


no really i want you to justify the existence of female prisons to me

you don't care about rape risk, so that's not it. and i don't see how seperating them is to the benefit of society? is it showers? why is catering to their feely weelies our problem? didn't you say prisons aren't there for luxury? again you're completely discounting rape risk so why should i build an entire seperate building just to make them feel good? this is ridiculous. do you have any idea how expensive building an entire new building is? and you can't tell me that "well it's the law and i blindy agree with the law" is going to be your response.
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Kanaria
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1024
Founded: Jun 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Kanaria » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:07 am

Wisconsin9 wrote:
Kanaria wrote:Now we keep 'em in jail for 5000 times longer. :twisted:

Yes, I'm sure punitive action will make up for the entirely preventable trauma.

Sorry, I'm just really mad that this event happened...I'm layering on the sarcasm to keep the anger from boiling over. Somewhere along the way, the justice system should have thought about this in something other than a typically...abstract manner. If they don't keep her away from the other prisoners she's screwed.
Gauthier wrote:Nothing more delightful than the assumption that a transgendered MtF wants to be sent to women's prison for a free peep show. On that account men's prison population should all be put in solitary on the assumption that the gays might be ogling the other male prisoners.

Don't you mean male prisoners? Wouldn't they be running the free illegal peep show?

Federal Republic of Kanaria-
57 federal entities, 863.2 million people, $40.67 trillion GDP, Gini coefficient 0.38. North Pacific, 1,500 miles west of San Fransisco.

Federal Republic of Kanaria- 57 federal entities, $154 trillion GDP, Gini coefficient 0.39. Northern Ruson, Arctic/Anican/Pacific Ocean, 69 lightyears from San Fransisco, Chi Eridani system.
Liberal
Federalist
Republican
Democrat
Statist
Cishet male


American
And silly rabbit, Kanaria's a caliphate.

User avatar
Wisconsin9
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35753
Founded: May 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Wisconsin9 » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:07 am

Kanaria wrote:
Wisconsin9 wrote:Yes, I'm sure punitive action will make up for the entirely preventable trauma.

Sorry, I'm just really mad that this event happened...I'm layering on the sarcasm to keep the anger from boiling over. Somewhere along the way, the justice system should have thought about this in something other than a typically...abstract manner. If they don't keep her away from the other prisoners she's screwed.

Ah, alright. Carry on.
~~~~~~~~
We are currently 33% through the Trump administration.
................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................

User avatar
Serksis Federation
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 435
Founded: Mar 08, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Serksis Federation » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:07 am

Alyakia wrote:
Serksis Federation wrote:A prison for transgenders that did not get their gender legally reassigned and was guilty of a crime? Yeah go be an activist for that.


no really i want you to justify the existence of female prisons to me

you don't care about rape risk, so that's not it. and i don't see how seperating them is to the benefit of society? is it showers? why is catering to their feely weelies our problem? didn't you say prisons aren't there for luxury? again you're completely discounting rape risk so why should i build an entire seperate building just to make them feel good? this is ridiculous. do you have any idea how expensive building an entire new building is? and you can't tell me that "well it's the law and i blindy agree with the law" is going to be your response.


I care about the rape risk, obviously. I never said anything about her never being raped.
No Law Can Set You Free

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:10 am

BK117B2 wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:The betterment of society would argue strongly against throwing an attractive, large-breasted woman into a male prison.
It would instead argue for placing that person into a women's prison or putting them on any other sort of sentence that is appropriate for an assault charge. There are many that do not involve prison sentences.


Eh, locked up seems a reasonable place for those who initiate unwanted violence against others

Many people don't receive that sentence. In many cases, it is not necessary.

And again, no-one is arguing she should not go to a prison. People are arguing she should not go to this prison.
Serksis Federation wrote:
Wisconsin9 wrote:It's putting someone in a place where it's not unlikely she'll be raped, in direct contravention of the opinion of a medical expert, because of a technicality on her passport. I can't think of a better example of blind adherence than this.

Everyone is likely to be raped in a male prison, that should be changed for everyone not just in her case alone.

Not adding one more to the statistics in the first place seems a good place to start, not sure about you.
Wallenburg wrote:This is total bullshit. They aren't even doing a good job pretending that they aren't persecuting her for being transgender.

It wasn't done with malice.

The article phrases it in such a manner to suggest that the court considered sending the defendant to a female prison but given her legal status as a legal male, it felt it had "no choice" but to send Tara to a male prison. Which is surely a failing of the importance placed on the legal status since following it will put a person at grave, unnecessary risk.
Serksis Federation wrote:
Alyakia wrote:
no really i want you to justify the existence of female prisons to me

you don't care about rape risk, so that's not it. and i don't see how seperating them is to the benefit of society? is it showers? why is catering to their feely weelies our problem? didn't you say prisons aren't there for luxury? again you're completely discounting rape risk so why should i build an entire seperate building just to make them feel good? this is ridiculous. do you have any idea how expensive building an entire new building is? and you can't tell me that "well it's the law and i blindy agree with the law" is going to be your response.


I care about the rape risk, obviously. I never said anything about her never being raped.

Well evidently not, because you oppose measures be taken to prevent the risk of harm she face besides place her in solitary or introduce a judicial review that will change things in ten years, not three months.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Hauptskalreich
Secretary
 
Posts: 26
Founded: Jul 20, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Hauptskalreich » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:13 am

Ifreann wrote:
Mr Howell wrote:he's a filthy criminal, who cares what prison he goes to.

*she

No, he.

User avatar
Wisconsin9
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35753
Founded: May 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Wisconsin9 » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:13 am

Serksis Federation wrote:
Wisconsin9 wrote:Oh for fuck's sake, take a look at that picture and tell me she isn't going to move straight to the top of everybody's list.

She isn't going to go to the top of everybody's list. Also inmates can be put in cells alone away from others if they are at risk themselves.

Right, so now instead of just sending her to a prison she shouldn't actually be in, we're also isolating her from most human contact for three months, to protect her from a threat she wouldn't have needed protection from if she was sent to the right prison in the first place. And, well, the possible psychological harm that something like that can cause sure is a shame, but hey, she asked for it by not jumping through that one specific hoop over there.

:roll:
~~~~~~~~
We are currently 33% through the Trump administration.
................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................

User avatar
Kanaria
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1024
Founded: Jun 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Kanaria » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:16 am

Hauptskalreich wrote:
Ifreann wrote:*she

No, he.

How is it that such a person can still be identified as "he" despite all the effort they made to resemble people who would be called "she"? Biological naturalism? Gender identity is as much biologically influenced as chromosomes are. Don't bring your stupid shit up about identifying with a fucking animal or other shit, either, and try and claim that's the same and q.e.d. gender identity and transgenderism is ridiculous.

Federal Republic of Kanaria-
57 federal entities, 863.2 million people, $40.67 trillion GDP, Gini coefficient 0.38. North Pacific, 1,500 miles west of San Fransisco.

Federal Republic of Kanaria- 57 federal entities, $154 trillion GDP, Gini coefficient 0.39. Northern Ruson, Arctic/Anican/Pacific Ocean, 69 lightyears from San Fransisco, Chi Eridani system.
Liberal
Federalist
Republican
Democrat
Statist
Cishet male


American
And silly rabbit, Kanaria's a caliphate.

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22866
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:17 am

Hauptskalreich wrote:
Ifreann wrote:*she

No, he.

No, she. She is a woman.
While she had no regrets about throwing the lever to douse her husband's mistress in molten gold, Blanche did feel a pang of conscience for the innocent bystanders whose proximity had caused them to suffer gilt by association.

King of Snark, Real Piece of Work, Metabolizer of Oxygen, Old Man from The East Pacific, by the Malevolence of Her Infinite Terribleness Catherine Gratwick the Sole and True Claimant to the Bears Armed Vacancy, Protector of the Realm

User avatar
Kanaria
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1024
Founded: Jun 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Kanaria » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:18 am

Wallenburg wrote:
Hauptskalreich wrote:No, he.

No, she. She is a woman.

My thoughts exactly.

Federal Republic of Kanaria-
57 federal entities, 863.2 million people, $40.67 trillion GDP, Gini coefficient 0.38. North Pacific, 1,500 miles west of San Fransisco.

Federal Republic of Kanaria- 57 federal entities, $154 trillion GDP, Gini coefficient 0.39. Northern Ruson, Arctic/Anican/Pacific Ocean, 69 lightyears from San Fransisco, Chi Eridani system.
Liberal
Federalist
Republican
Democrat
Statist
Cishet male


American
And silly rabbit, Kanaria's a caliphate.

User avatar
Serksis Federation
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 435
Founded: Mar 08, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Serksis Federation » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:19 am

Wisconsin9 wrote:
Serksis Federation wrote:She isn't going to go to the top of everybody's list. Also inmates can be put in cells alone away from others if they are at risk themselves.

Right, so now instead of just sending her to a prison she shouldn't actually be in, we're also isolating her from most human contact for three months, to protect her from a threat she wouldn't have needed protection from if she was sent to the right prison in the first place. And, well, the possible psychological harm that something like that can cause sure is a shame, but hey, she asked for it by not jumping through that one specific hoop over there.

:roll:

It being the prison you want her to be sent to doesn't make it the right prison.
No Law Can Set You Free

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:20 am

Sure, put a woman in an all-male prison. I'm sure nothing bad will come from that. It's not like transgender women are already subjected to disproportionate amounts of violence outside of prisons.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Furry Alairia and Algeria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21009
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Furry Alairia and Algeria » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:21 am

The Patrimony of Saint Peter wrote:
Alvecia wrote:
False


So if you paint me with white and black stripes am I a zebra? I demand to be a zebra. I shall have my hands removed and put hooves on them and I shall join my zebra brethren on the Serengeti. And when I commit a crime you can't do shit because I'm a zebra.

He's a guy. He has a vestigial thingy so he's a guy. Call him Chelsie or Samantha all you want but he's a guy. You don't always get what you want. I can't be a zebra. He is just taking halloween way too seriously and wants to be a monster all year round. It's working.

One is a completely foolish idea not applicable to humans, the other is transgenderism.
Last edited by Furry Alairia and Algeria on Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
In memory of Dyakovo - may he never be forgotten - Дьяковожс ученик


I do not reply to telegrams, unless you are someone I know.

User avatar
Kanaria
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1024
Founded: Jun 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Kanaria » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:21 am

Liriena wrote:Sure, put a woman in an all-male prison. I'm sure nothing bad will come from that. It's not like transgender women are already subjected to disproportionate amounts of violence outside of prisons.

The bloodshed continues.
The letter of the law isn't the spirit. Wonder if Britain forgot that.

Federal Republic of Kanaria-
57 federal entities, 863.2 million people, $40.67 trillion GDP, Gini coefficient 0.38. North Pacific, 1,500 miles west of San Fransisco.

Federal Republic of Kanaria- 57 federal entities, $154 trillion GDP, Gini coefficient 0.39. Northern Ruson, Arctic/Anican/Pacific Ocean, 69 lightyears from San Fransisco, Chi Eridani system.
Liberal
Federalist
Republican
Democrat
Statist
Cishet male


American
And silly rabbit, Kanaria's a caliphate.

User avatar
Wisconsin9
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35753
Founded: May 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Wisconsin9 » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:23 am

Serksis Federation wrote:
Wisconsin9 wrote:Right, so now instead of just sending her to a prison she shouldn't actually be in, we're also isolating her from most human contact for three months, to protect her from a threat she wouldn't have needed protection from if she was sent to the right prison in the first place. And, well, the possible psychological harm that something like that can cause sure is a shame, but hey, she asked for it by not jumping through that one specific hoop over there.

:roll:

It being the prison you want her to be sent to doesn't make it the right prison.

You're not getting extra credit for skipping over the part of my post where I mention the psychological effects of long-term isolation.
~~~~~~~~
We are currently 33% through the Trump administration.
................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................

User avatar
Serksis Federation
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 435
Founded: Mar 08, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Serksis Federation » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:27 am

Wisconsin9 wrote:
Serksis Federation wrote:It being the prison you want her to be sent to doesn't make it the right prison.

You're not getting extra credit for skipping over the part of my post where I mention the psychological effects of long-term isolation.


Everything became irrelevant there. There are psychological effects on going to prison no matter what.
No Law Can Set You Free

User avatar
Wisconsin9
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35753
Founded: May 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Wisconsin9 » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:29 am

Serksis Federation wrote:
Wisconsin9 wrote:You're not getting extra credit for skipping over the part of my post where I mention the psychological effects of long-term isolation.


Everything became irrelevant there. There are psychological effects on going to prison no matter what.

The fact that the slippery slope is there doesn't mean we should grab a sled.
~~~~~~~~
We are currently 33% through the Trump administration.
................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:30 am

Serksis Federation wrote:
Wisconsin9 wrote:You're not getting extra credit for skipping over the part of my post where I mention the psychological effects of long-term isolation.


Everything became irrelevant there. There are psychological effects on going to prison no matter what.

Yes, but some effects go beyond what is strictly necessary for the purposes of imprisonment, and go straight into cruel and unusual punishment.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:31 am

Wisconsin9 wrote:
Serksis Federation wrote:It being the prison you want her to be sent to doesn't make it the right prison.

You're not getting extra credit for skipping over the part of my post where I mention the psychological effects of long-term isolation.


You mean the stuff about how solitary is considered to be torture by some international bodies?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Wisconsin9
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35753
Founded: May 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Wisconsin9 » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:31 am

Vassenor wrote:
Wisconsin9 wrote:You're not getting extra credit for skipping over the part of my post where I mention the psychological effects of long-term isolation.


You mean the stuff about how solitary is considered to be torture by some international bodies?

Yes. That. That is exactly the kind of stuff I meant.
~~~~~~~~
We are currently 33% through the Trump administration.
................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................

User avatar
Serksis Federation
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 435
Founded: Mar 08, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Serksis Federation » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:32 am

Wisconsin9 wrote:
Serksis Federation wrote:
Everything became irrelevant there. There are psychological effects on going to prison no matter what.

The fact that the slippery slope is there doesn't mean we should grab a sled.

Do you think things will go smoothly in a female prison?
No Law Can Set You Free

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, Caurus, Hypron, Infected Mushroom, Keltionialang, Neu California, Turenia

Advertisement

Remove ads