by United States of White America » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:44 am
by The Grim Reaper » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:48 am
United States of White America wrote:Although Nietzsche was a god-fearing atheist and his quote is positive, I believe it is negative. I think God has died because of our corrupt, open society, where there is no objective sense of right and wrong. Instead, I propose to resurrect God and avenge him.
by Days of Rodeo » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:50 am
United States of White America wrote:Although Nietzsche was a god-fearing atheist and his quote is positive, I believe it is negative. I think God has died because of our corrupt, open society, where there is no objective sense of right and wrong. Instead, I propose to resurrect God and avenge him.
by Dyakovo » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:51 am
United States of White America wrote:Although Nietzsche was a god-fearing atheist and his quote is positive, I believe it is negative. I think God has died because of our corrupt, open society, where there is no objective sense of right and wrong. Instead, I propose to resurrect God and avenge him.
by Risottia » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:51 am
United States of White America wrote:Although Nietzsche was a god-fearing atheist and his quote is positive, I believe it is negative. I think God has died because of our corrupt, open society, where there is no objective sense of right and wrong. Instead, I propose to resurrect God and avenge him.
by Christainville » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:52 am
Iwassoclose wrote:Not much of a god if he dies for such a shitty reason.
by Genivaria » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:52 am
United States of White America wrote:Although Nietzsche was a god-fearing atheist and his quote is positive, I believe it is negative. I think God has died because of our corrupt, open society, where there is no objective sense of right and wrong. Instead, I propose to resurrect God and avenge him.
by Genivaria » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:52 am
Risottia wrote:United States of White America wrote:Although Nietzsche was a god-fearing atheist and his quote is positive, I believe it is negative. I think God has died because of our corrupt, open society, where there is no objective sense of right and wrong. Instead, I propose to resurrect God and avenge him.
No way.
When we meet aliens from outer space, we'll yell:
We poison our air and water to weed out the weak!
We set off fission bombs in our only biosphere!
We nailed our god to a stick!
Don't fuck with the human race!
by Christainville » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:54 am
United States of White America wrote:Although Nietzsche was a god-fearing atheist and his quote is positive, I believe it is negative. I think God has died because of our corrupt, open society, where there is no objective sense of right and wrong. Instead, I propose to resurrect God and avenge him.
by Dyakovo » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:55 am
Genivaria wrote:United States of White America wrote:Although Nietzsche was a god-fearing atheist and his quote is positive, I believe it is negative. I think God has died because of our corrupt, open society, where there is no objective sense of right and wrong. Instead, I propose to resurrect God and avenge him.
I'll camp at his spawn point, hehehe.
*Double-kill*, *Triple-Kill*
Die zombie, DIE!
by New Werpland » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:55 am
by Infected Mushroom » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:56 am
by Highfort » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:56 am
Christainville wrote:United States of White America wrote:Although Nietzsche was a god-fearing atheist and his quote is positive, I believe it is negative. I think God has died because of our corrupt, open society, where there is no objective sense of right and wrong. Instead, I propose to resurrect God and avenge him.
I think the point is, what or who is God? Is it a moral, is it a being, is it a war lord? What is your definition of God. Honestly, anyone can "kill a God", you can deny him, or go against a teaching, in theory that kills that beings power over you since you don't follow it. Yet, it doesn't kill the God since others can believe in it. Yet, you come to the point of does the God even need your compliance to do as he pleases? That opens up another viewpoint. So, honestly this can be viewed many ways.
by Sollis » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:57 am
Risottia wrote:United States of White America wrote:Although Nietzsche was a god-fearing atheist and his quote is positive, I believe it is negative. I think God has died because of our corrupt, open society, where there is no objective sense of right and wrong. Instead, I propose to resurrect God and avenge him.
No way.
When we meet aliens from outer space, we'll yell:
We poison our air and water to weed out the weak!
We set off fission bombs in our only biosphere!
We nailed our god to a stick!
Don't fuck with the human race!
by Mefpan » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:58 am
by Highfort » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:58 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:This is ridiculous...
God definitionaly can't be dead; if he exists, then he definitionaly can't die
You have to keep things consistent. Either God exists and he is alive... or God doesn't exist. There is no such thing as God exists and he is dead now (let alone any further consideration of whether or not he should be resurrected and avenged).
We should pay no attention to this Mr. N whoever he was because his statement simply isn't consistent. If something dies, then that something definitionally can't be ''God''; Mr. N thought he was being witty but in fact he's just saying contradictory and impossible things. Quite a typical move for self-styled academic philosopher elites I suppose...
by The Holy Therns » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:59 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:This is ridiculous...
God definitionaly can't be dead; if he exists, then he definitionaly can't die
You have to keep things consistent. Either God exists and he is alive... or God doesn't exist. There is no such thing as God exists and he is dead now (let alone any further consideration of whether or not he should be resurrected and avenged).
We should pay no attention to this Mr. N whoever he was because his statement simply isn't consistent. If something dies, then that something definitionally can't be ''God''; Mr. N thought he was being witty but in fact he's just saying contradictory and impossible things. Quite a typical move for self-styled academic philosopher elites I suppose...
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜
Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.
by Infected Mushroom » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:59 am
Highfort wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:This is ridiculous...
God definitionaly can't be dead; if he exists, then he definitionaly can't die
You have to keep things consistent. Either God exists and he is alive... or God doesn't exist. There is no such thing as God exists and he is dead now (let alone any further consideration of whether or not he should be resurrected and avenged).
We should pay no attention to this Mr. N whoever he was because his statement simply isn't consistent. If something dies, then that something definitionally can't be ''God''; Mr. N thought he was being witty but in fact he's just saying contradictory and impossible things. Quite a typical move for self-styled academic philosopher elites I suppose...
You mean it can't be the Christian God. Immortality is not a prerequisite to being a god, since a god is merely "a superhuman being or spirit worshiped as having power over nature or human fortunes". Nowhere in there does the concept of immortality become necessary.
by Ardavia » Mon Sep 21, 2015 11:00 am
Mefpan wrote:I am a human and I don't bow to any lowly god-creature! All hail the Man-Emperor of Mankind!
by Infected Mushroom » Mon Sep 21, 2015 11:00 am
The Holy Therns wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:This is ridiculous...
God definitionaly can't be dead; if he exists, then he definitionaly can't die
You have to keep things consistent. Either God exists and he is alive... or God doesn't exist. There is no such thing as God exists and he is dead now (let alone any further consideration of whether or not he should be resurrected and avenged).
We should pay no attention to this Mr. N whoever he was because his statement simply isn't consistent. If something dies, then that something definitionally can't be ''God''; Mr. N thought he was being witty but in fact he's just saying contradictory and impossible things. Quite a typical move for self-styled academic philosopher elites I suppose...
You clearly understood the statement perfectly and without any error whatsoever. Good job.
by The Wolven League » Mon Sep 21, 2015 11:00 am
by Apollinis » Mon Sep 21, 2015 11:01 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:This is ridiculous...
God definitionaly can't be dead; if he exists, then he definitionaly can't die
You have to keep things consistent. Either God exists and he is alive... or God doesn't exist. There is no such thing as God exists and he is dead now (let alone any further consideration of whether or not he should be resurrected and avenged).
We should pay no attention to this Mr. N whoever he was because his statement simply isn't consistent. If something dies, then that something definitionally can't be ''God''; Mr. N thought he was being witty but in fact he's just saying contradictory and impossible things. Quite a typical move for self-styled academic philosopher elites I suppose...
by Highfort » Mon Sep 21, 2015 11:01 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:I'm assuming he was a Westerner, and typically when Westerners talk about ''God'' they mean the Judeo-Christian God and we all know the Judeo-Christian God, according to the narrative, cannot be killed
he's just stating a contradiction and trying to masquerade it as wisdom
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cyptopir, Keltionialang, MERIZoC, Phoeniae, Shrillland, Soviet Haaregrad, Tricorniolis, Tungstan
Advertisement