Advertisement
by Super-Llamaland » Mon Jul 20, 2015 6:46 pm
by Eura » Mon Jul 20, 2015 6:58 pm
by San Jose Guayabal » Mon Jul 20, 2015 8:25 pm
by The Saint James Islands » Mon Jul 20, 2015 8:34 pm
San Llera wrote:Say EQS doesn't show up and doesn't get their World Cup spot.
What if the 128 teams that didn't qualify play a single-elimination tournament to determine who gets that spot?
Stellonia wrote:I also hope that special precautions are taken to ensure that San Jose Guayabal and Gregoryisnotgodistan are not drawn together.
Classical republican, environmental student
Pro: Parliamentarism, civic virtue, positive liberty, soft Euroscepticism, the scientific method, facts
Anti: Presidentialism, authoritarianism, corruption, populism, hard Euroscepticism, misinformation
IC posts made by this nation are non-canonical.
This nation does not reflect my actual political views.
Do not use orally after using rectally.Guilherme Magalhães
Senator for Ilhas de Santiago Ocidentais
Staunchly independent
[23:53] <StJames> ^fake news^
The death of the West will not be a homicide, but a suicide.
by Free Republics » Mon Jul 20, 2015 9:04 pm
Stellonia wrote:I also hope that special precautions are taken to ensure that San Jose Guayabal and Gregoryisnotgodistan are not drawn together.
by Yttribia » Mon Jul 20, 2015 9:11 pm
Stellonia wrote:I also hope that special precautions are taken to ensure that San Jose Guayabal and Gregoryisnotgodistan are not drawn together.
by Valanora » Mon Jul 20, 2015 9:32 pm
by Yttribia » Mon Jul 20, 2015 10:23 pm
World Cup Committee Constitution wrote:2.3.2 Hosting
i) Any nation that has previously participated in a World Cup, and participated in its most recently completed edition, may bid to host the World Cup, except if the user has co-hosted the previous World Cup.
ii) Two-host bids are the preferred format, though any number of hosts are acceptable.
iii) The WCC will be directed by the President to vote: a) for one of the offered bids, b) to officially abstain, or c) to re-open the process for new bids.
iv) Friendlies are not the responsibility of the hosts beyond basic organisation. Co-hosts may not include as part of their proposal any information on the organisation of friendlies, nor may they answer questions on friendly organisation. Co-hosts may choose to start a thread for friendly organisation, may choose to schedule slots in World Cup qualification for friendlies, and may limit the number of friendlies; but there is no presumption that co-hosts will scorinate any friendly matches, and nations holding friendlies should assume that they are responsible for arranging their own friendly scorination unless otherwise specified.[/blocktext]
by Free Republics » Mon Jul 20, 2015 10:25 pm
by The Royal Kingdom of Quebec » Mon Jul 20, 2015 10:27 pm
by Valanora » Mon Jul 20, 2015 10:30 pm
by Nova Anglicana » Mon Jul 20, 2015 10:30 pm
by Vilita » Mon Jul 20, 2015 10:36 pm
by Cosumar » Mon Jul 20, 2015 10:50 pm
Valanora wrote:As the people on IRC know, but as an experiment, I ran two scorinations throughout the qualifiers, one with NSFS as the official and the other with SQIS, using the same RP bonus and modifiers, to compare the two. I think the results speak for themselves and why I prefere NSFS, though both are flawed creations as I said a few days ago.
This is your WCQ on SQIS
by Polar Islandstates » Tue Jul 21, 2015 12:19 am
by Bears Armed » Tue Jul 21, 2015 2:16 am
Valanora wrote:As the people on IRC know, but as an experiment, I ran two scorinations throughout the qualifiers, one with NSFS as the official and the other with SQIS, using the same RP bonus and modifiers, to compare the two. I think the results speak for themselves and why I prefere NSFS, though both are flawed creations as I said a few days ago.
This is your WCQ on SQIS
Cosumar wrote:I very much prefer these results Still well below what I wanted, but at least I won more than two games...
by Greater Watford » Tue Jul 21, 2015 3:53 am
San Llera wrote:Say EQS doesn't show up and doesn't get their World Cup spot.
What if the 128 teams that didn't qualify play a single-elimination tournament to determine who gets that spot?
by Nephara » Tue Jul 21, 2015 3:57 am
Bears Armed wrote:Valanora wrote:As the people on IRC know, but as an experiment, I ran two scorinations throughout the qualifiers, one with NSFS as the official and the other with SQIS, using the same RP bonus and modifiers, to compare the two. I think the results speak for themselves and why I prefere NSFS, though both are flawed creations as I said a few days ago.
This is your WCQ on SQIS
Well, at least for Group 11, the results after using SQUIS look a lot closer to the pre-contest rankings: Not enough variation from "highest-ranked team wins" for your liking?
by Stvoto Latoli » Tue Jul 21, 2015 3:58 am
by Eastfield Lodge » Tue Jul 21, 2015 4:51 am
P Group 13 Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts
1 The Holy Republican Empire 14 10 2 2 37 20 +17 32
2 Eastfield Lodge 14 9 4 1 39 21 +18 31
3 Buyan 14 8 5 1 24 13 +11 29
4 Cosumar 14 7 2 5 34 25 +9 23
by Vilita » Tue Jul 21, 2015 4:59 am
Stvoto Latoli wrote:
I am honestly a bit baffled that you're declaring victory here, ESF.
You've said on IRC regularly that too many top-20 nations were missing out on the Finals in the SQIS sim. I count one: Vilita, who (with no disrespect to one of the greatest nations in the history of this game) only started roleplaying after Matchday 10 when it became clear KPB-coasting to qualification was possibly not going to work.
by The Archregimancy » Tue Jul 21, 2015 6:13 am
Vilita wrote:So, just everyone, take it one notch back and enjoy it a little more - no matter what the result.
by Chiata » Tue Jul 21, 2015 6:36 am
by Bears Armed » Tue Jul 21, 2015 7:29 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Auprussia, Squornshelan Remnant States, Sylestone
Advertisement