I am of the opinion that the Omnibus precedent should NOT be overturned. The purpose of such a precedent ensures that legislation that enters into the Supreme Court is refined, concise, and less ambiguous. Overturning such an important cornerstone for the Constitutional Reform Amendment, though appearing to be necessary, is in reality an unnecessary move that endangers future corruption and possible deterioration of regional administration.
A simple solution is to go around the Omnibus precedent. This can be done to change the Constitutional Reform Amendment to only contain a provision for a constitutional convention that considers the changes wrought in by the current C.R.A. This method makes legislation with a concise purpose (establishing a C.R.A. to consider changing the constition), and avoids controversy by being too broad on an issue which, though necessitating broadness, is inappropriate for conventional judicial/governmental procedure.
