Scotty lost a finger in WWII and he survived Star Trek, while wearing a red shirt.
But yes, Patton was a real live badass.
Advertisement
by Tayner » Sat Jun 20, 2015 9:10 am
by Vacif » Sat Jun 20, 2015 9:10 am
by Tayner » Sat Jun 20, 2015 9:11 am
Vacif wrote:So, air, armor, or infantry?
by Australian Antarctica » Sat Jun 20, 2015 9:11 am
Tayner wrote:Australian Antarctica wrote:Yes it is. That was my last one. But Patton was much better. He was a General, Olympian, and all around Badass. Plus he led the first American Tank charge ever.
Scotty lost a finger in WWII and he survived Star Trek, while wearing a red shirt.
But yes, Patton was a real live badass.
Vacif wrote:So, air, armor, or infantry?
Deramen wrote:Cause if anything im a MOTHERFUCKING T-REX!
by Australian Antarctica » Sat Jun 20, 2015 9:14 am
Deramen wrote:Cause if anything im a MOTHERFUCKING T-REX!
by The Mediterranean Republic » Sat Jun 20, 2015 9:15 am
by Australian Antarctica » Sat Jun 20, 2015 9:17 am
Deramen wrote:Cause if anything im a MOTHERFUCKING T-REX!
by Tayner » Sat Jun 20, 2015 9:18 am
Australian Antarctica wrote:Charlia wrote:I just realized this, but did you know that Obama is on your 'anti' list twice? Is that intentional?
It is intentional. That's how much I dislike him.Tayner wrote:Scotty lost a finger in WWII and he survived Star Trek, while wearing a red shirt.
But yes, Patton was a real live badass.
In every sense of the word.Vacif wrote:So, air, armor, or infantry?
Combined arms.
by Australian Antarctica » Sat Jun 20, 2015 9:19 am
Deramen wrote:Cause if anything im a MOTHERFUCKING T-REX!
by Charlia » Sat Jun 20, 2015 9:21 am
by Australian Antarctica » Sat Jun 20, 2015 9:23 am
Charlia wrote:Australian Antarctica wrote:First two I love, second two I've never had the pleasure of watching.
Your approval rating takes a dive, climbs back up even farther than before, dips a bit, stays even.
AKA don't really like Star Wars, love Star Trek, love Doctor Who but if you haven't seen it yet I'll forgive you, and Stargate... well, when I type in the words 'does stargate' into Google Search, the first option that comes up is 'does stargate sg1 get better'.
AKA... it really kind of sucks.
Deramen wrote:Cause if anything im a MOTHERFUCKING T-REX!
by Charlia » Sat Jun 20, 2015 9:25 am
Australian Antarctica wrote:Charlia wrote:Your approval rating takes a dive, climbs back up even farther than before, dips a bit, stays even.
AKA don't really like Star Wars, love Star Trek, love Doctor Who but if you haven't seen it yet I'll forgive you, and Stargate... well, when I type in the words 'does stargate' into Google Search, the first option that comes up is 'does stargate sg1 get better'.
AKA... it really kind of sucks.
Star Wars just has everything in my opinion. Action, Explosions, and Politics. Star Trek does as well though... I don't know, they are both awesome.
by Tayner » Sat Jun 20, 2015 9:26 am
by Australian Antarctica » Sat Jun 20, 2015 9:26 am
Charlia wrote:Australian Antarctica wrote:Star Wars just has everything in my opinion. Action, Explosions, and Politics. Star Trek does as well though... I don't know, they are both awesome.
I used to love SW, don't get me wrong, but then I watched ST and DW and just... just couldn't be impressed anymore.
Deramen wrote:Cause if anything im a MOTHERFUCKING T-REX!
by Australian Antarctica » Sat Jun 20, 2015 9:28 am
Deramen wrote:Cause if anything im a MOTHERFUCKING T-REX!
by Tayner » Sat Jun 20, 2015 9:29 am
by Galdius » Sat Jun 20, 2015 9:29 am
Tayner wrote:Australian Antarctica wrote:I used Air power to clear the path for the armor, who cleared the path for artillery, who then cleared the path for infantry.
If there were helicopters, I'd send transports, if ther were helicopters and tanks, I'd send transports, and helicopters. If there were transports, helicopters, and tanks, I'd use a WMD.
by Charlia » Sat Jun 20, 2015 9:32 am
Galdius wrote:Tayner wrote:If there were helicopters, I'd send transports, if ther were helicopters and tanks, I'd send transports, and helicopters. If there were transports, helicopters, and tanks, I'd use a WMD.
You don't even need to use WMD's, and it only opens you up for the enemy to use a WMD too. just swamp them with engineers with priority targeting on the transports before sending in a combination of IFV's and helicopters.
IFV's, rifleman and engineers are the only things you genuinely need to worry about in that game, which is what makes the game very mediocre in terms of strategy.
by Australian Antarctica » Sat Jun 20, 2015 9:32 am
Tayner wrote:Australian Antarctica wrote:I used Air power to clear the path for the armor, who cleared the path for artillery, who then cleared the path for infantry.
If there were helicopters, I'd send transports, if ther were helicopters and tanks, I'd send transports, and helicopters. If there were transports, helicopters, and tanks, I'd use a WMD.
Charlia wrote:Galdius wrote:You don't even need to use WMD's, and it only opens you up for the enemy to use a WMD too. just swamp them with engineers with priority targeting on the transports before sending in a combination of IFV's and helicopters.
IFV's, rifleman and engineers are the only things you genuinely need to worry about in that game, which is what makes the game very mediocre in terms of strategy.
I hereby offer myself up for disembowelment.
(I read the small print.)
Deramen wrote:Cause if anything im a MOTHERFUCKING T-REX!
by Charlia » Sat Jun 20, 2015 9:39 am
by Australian Antarctica » Sat Jun 20, 2015 9:41 am
Deramen wrote:Cause if anything im a MOTHERFUCKING T-REX!
by Vacif » Sat Jun 20, 2015 9:59 am
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: Antimersia, Cybernetic Socialist Republics, G-Tech Corporation, The GAmeTopians
Advertisement