by Saintland » Fri May 15, 2015 7:23 pm
by Kaboomlandia » Thu May 28, 2015 7:32 pm
by Nephara » Thu May 28, 2015 7:46 pm
Kaboomlandia wrote:Yeah, I've got one.
Would the "goals for" tiebreaker not give an advantage to run-and-gun style modifiers?
by Kaboomlandia » Thu May 28, 2015 7:51 pm
Nephara wrote:Kaboomlandia wrote:Yeah, I've got one.
Would the "goals for" tiebreaker not give an advantage to run-and-gun style modifiers?
It's literally like the ninth tiebreaker. It's practically guaranteed not to come up. Goals for is more or less just for the real-life precedent. In fact, at least one NS tournament changed it to Goals Against.
Either way, don't let it impact your planned style modifier.
by Saintland » Thu May 28, 2015 9:12 pm
Nephara wrote:Kaboomlandia wrote:Yeah, I've got one.
Would the "goals for" tiebreaker not give an advantage to run-and-gun style modifiers?
It's literally like the ninth tiebreaker. It's practically guaranteed not to come up. Goals for is more or less just for the real-life precedent. In fact, at least one NS tournament changed it to Goals Against.
Either way, don't let it impact your planned style modifier.
by Greene County » Mon Jun 01, 2015 9:29 am
by Nurkama » Mon Jun 01, 2015 9:53 am
Greene County wrote:i am interested in joining. when do we need roster info turned in.....
by Saintland » Mon Jun 01, 2015 10:00 am
Greene County wrote:i am interested in joining. when do we need roster info turned in.....
by Saintland » Sun Jun 14, 2015 9:51 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot], United Mandaran States
Advertisement