Vashta Nerada wrote:Olerand wrote:Or you ban them. And when they speak out, you ship them to jail. If they speak out "mildly", you fine them for a couple of dozens of thousands of Euros.
I believe this to be equally sad and pathetic. You can't ban one form of speech because you don't like, and permit another that supports your views. This is why people are growing discontent with supposedly "democratic" governments in Europe. They say they support freedom of speech and expression, but the moment those freedoms begin to contradict their views, they move to curb them. You can't brag about being a free society that then turns around and aggressively censors those who do not support your way of thinking. Such hypocrisy is anathema to the very views European nations attempt to maintain. You have the right to disagree with someone's opinion as much as you have a right to express one. But you don't get to cherry-pick what a person can and cannot say based on your own biased opinion. As I already said, such a thought on jailing people because they are expressing their views regardless of the content, is pathetic in and of itself, and has been the source of many uprisings throughout history. The moment you start to censor or punish others who's views you dislike, then you start to become as bad, if not worse, than those you oppose. Regarding said freedoms, you either go the whole way or you don't go at all. You can't have both.
No, we definitely can. When your speech stigmatizes a certain people and calls for their punishment, it is harmful to society and not conducive to any debate; and it can, and should be, banned.