NATION

PASSWORD

How far would you go...

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
WWII History Geeks
Minister
 
Posts: 2257
Founded: Mar 12, 2008
Ex-Nation

How far would you go...

Postby WWII History Geeks » Fri May 28, 2010 2:13 pm

To protect your first amendmant rights? Would you kill to keep them intact? Or at the slightest hint of debate would you give them up?

DISCUSS! :lol:
The goldfish crackers will win. Do you know why they smile? Because when they get inside you they start eating you from the inside out.

Grandtaria: "I would rather live my life each day thinking there is a God and die to find out there isn't, than to live my thinking that there isn't and die to find out there is."
Conservative Morality: "When in Rome, do as the Romans. When out of Rome, do as the Romans anyway, it's not like anyone is ballsy enough to piss off Rome."

Finally fixed: The thread may be gone, but I'm still a "To Hell with This'er!," damnit! :D

Boob sisters with Celestial Divinities!

User avatar
Tom Bishop
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 363
Founded: May 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Tom Bishop » Fri May 28, 2010 2:14 pm

There's no point as we are already being oppressed.

User avatar
Straughn
Senator
 
Posts: 3530
Founded: Apr 11, 2004
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Straughn » Fri May 28, 2010 2:15 pm

Tom Bishop wrote:There's no point as we are already being oppressed.

Win.

User avatar
WWII History Geeks
Minister
 
Posts: 2257
Founded: Mar 12, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby WWII History Geeks » Fri May 28, 2010 2:15 pm

Tom Bishop wrote:There's no point as we are already being oppressed.

Then would you kill to regain those rights? How important are they to you?
The goldfish crackers will win. Do you know why they smile? Because when they get inside you they start eating you from the inside out.

Grandtaria: "I would rather live my life each day thinking there is a God and die to find out there isn't, than to live my thinking that there isn't and die to find out there is."
Conservative Morality: "When in Rome, do as the Romans. When out of Rome, do as the Romans anyway, it's not like anyone is ballsy enough to piss off Rome."

Finally fixed: The thread may be gone, but I'm still a "To Hell with This'er!," damnit! :D

Boob sisters with Celestial Divinities!

User avatar
Tom Bishop
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 363
Founded: May 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Tom Bishop » Fri May 28, 2010 2:17 pm

WWII History Geeks wrote:
Tom Bishop wrote:There's no point as we are already being oppressed.

Then would you kill to regain those rights? How important are they to you?


They are unobtainable.

User avatar
North Amerikan States
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 426
Founded: Feb 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby North Amerikan States » Fri May 28, 2010 2:17 pm

Tom Bishop wrote:There's no point as we are already being oppressed.

By that big scary world government? :rofl:
New Nicksyllvania wrote:You're fucking nicked boy!

A Ant wrote:Communists wear ridiculous hats.

Ser James wrote:because fuck brown people.

User avatar
WWII History Geeks
Minister
 
Posts: 2257
Founded: Mar 12, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby WWII History Geeks » Fri May 28, 2010 2:17 pm

Tom Bishop wrote:
WWII History Geeks wrote:
Tom Bishop wrote:There's no point as we are already being oppressed.

Then would you kill to regain those rights? How important are they to you?


They are unobtainable.

Okay, but say they were.
The goldfish crackers will win. Do you know why they smile? Because when they get inside you they start eating you from the inside out.

Grandtaria: "I would rather live my life each day thinking there is a God and die to find out there isn't, than to live my thinking that there isn't and die to find out there is."
Conservative Morality: "When in Rome, do as the Romans. When out of Rome, do as the Romans anyway, it's not like anyone is ballsy enough to piss off Rome."

Finally fixed: The thread may be gone, but I'm still a "To Hell with This'er!," damnit! :D

Boob sisters with Celestial Divinities!

User avatar
Tsa-la-gi Nation
Minister
 
Posts: 2823
Founded: Aug 19, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Tsa-la-gi Nation » Fri May 28, 2010 2:18 pm

WWII History Geeks wrote:
Tom Bishop wrote:There's no point as we are already being oppressed.

Then would you kill to regain those rights? How important are they to you?

I would pick up a rifle to protect the 1st ammendment.

User avatar
Tom Bishop
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 363
Founded: May 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Tom Bishop » Fri May 28, 2010 2:19 pm

WWII History Geeks wrote:
Tom Bishop wrote:
WWII History Geeks wrote:
Tom Bishop wrote:There's no point as we are already being oppressed.

Then would you kill to regain those rights? How important are they to you?


They are unobtainable.

Okay, but say they were.


In this point in time it would be hard to topple a government of Western Europe or North America which takes your rights. Especially if they're united under one regime.
Last edited by Tom Bishop on Fri May 28, 2010 2:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
North Amerikan States
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 426
Founded: Feb 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby North Amerikan States » Fri May 28, 2010 2:21 pm

Tom Bishop wrote:
WWII History Geeks wrote:
Tom Bishop wrote:
WWII History Geeks wrote:
Tom Bishop wrote:There's no point as we are already being oppressed.

Then would you kill to regain those rights? How important are they to you?


They are unobtainable.

Okay, but say they were.


In this point in time it would be hard to topple a government of Western Europe or North America which takes your rights. Especially if they're united under one regime.

Not really, you just need to use a different method.
New Nicksyllvania wrote:You're fucking nicked boy!

A Ant wrote:Communists wear ridiculous hats.

Ser James wrote:because fuck brown people.

User avatar
Tom Bishop
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 363
Founded: May 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Tom Bishop » Fri May 28, 2010 2:23 pm

North Amerikan States wrote:
Tom Bishop wrote:
WWII History Geeks wrote:
Tom Bishop wrote:
WWII History Geeks wrote:
Tom Bishop wrote:There's no point as we are already being oppressed.

Then would you kill to regain those rights? How important are they to you?


They are unobtainable.

Okay, but say they were.


In this point in time it would be hard to topple a government of Western Europe or North America which takes your rights. Especially if they're united under one regime.

Not really, you just need to use a different method.


The only important right is the right to think. Not out loud. Just think. All the other rights are pointless.

User avatar
Cobhanglica
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1813
Founded: Feb 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Cobhanglica » Fri May 28, 2010 2:23 pm

As far as is necessary.
Cobhanglica's top officials
President: George Rockwell
Sec. of Foreign Relations: Martin Lansing
Sec. of Defense: General James Arnold
Sec. of Trade: Henry Ford Smith


My Political Compass:
Economic Left/Right: 4.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 4.72

User avatar
Carls-land
Minister
 
Posts: 2087
Founded: Apr 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Carls-land » Fri May 28, 2010 2:26 pm

i would do everything to stop those who seek to have these ''right's''

User avatar
WWII History Geeks
Minister
 
Posts: 2257
Founded: Mar 12, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby WWII History Geeks » Fri May 28, 2010 2:29 pm

All of you would kill just to be able to say what you want to?
The goldfish crackers will win. Do you know why they smile? Because when they get inside you they start eating you from the inside out.

Grandtaria: "I would rather live my life each day thinking there is a God and die to find out there isn't, than to live my thinking that there isn't and die to find out there is."
Conservative Morality: "When in Rome, do as the Romans. When out of Rome, do as the Romans anyway, it's not like anyone is ballsy enough to piss off Rome."

Finally fixed: The thread may be gone, but I'm still a "To Hell with This'er!," damnit! :D

Boob sisters with Celestial Divinities!

User avatar
Carls-land
Minister
 
Posts: 2087
Founded: Apr 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Carls-land » Fri May 28, 2010 2:32 pm

WWII History Geeks wrote:All of you would kill just to be able to say what you want to?

no i was just trying to get a point Through

User avatar
Versaupt
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: May 13, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Versaupt » Fri May 28, 2010 2:33 pm

WWII History Geeks wrote:All of you would kill just to be able to say what you want to?


Hmm, good question. Don't think I could kill someone over it, if I'm honest.
I do enjoy having an opinion however, as well as the right to express that opinion.
I guess I'd protest.

User avatar
Straughn
Senator
 
Posts: 3530
Founded: Apr 11, 2004
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Straughn » Fri May 28, 2010 2:37 pm

Carls-land wrote:i would do everything to stop those who seek to have these ''right's''
What?

User avatar
Tsa-la-gi Nation
Minister
 
Posts: 2823
Founded: Aug 19, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Tsa-la-gi Nation » Fri May 28, 2010 2:37 pm

WWII History Geeks wrote:All of you would kill just to be able to say what you want to?

Once freedom of speech is gone, the powers that be can tell you what to think without a counter arguement.

User avatar
Carls-land
Minister
 
Posts: 2087
Founded: Apr 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Carls-land » Fri May 28, 2010 2:37 pm

Straughn wrote:
Carls-land wrote:i would do everything to stop those who seek to have these ''right's''
What?

only the police and military should have guns

User avatar
Cobhanglica
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1813
Founded: Feb 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Cobhanglica » Fri May 28, 2010 2:38 pm

WWII History Geeks wrote:All of you would kill just to be able to say what you want to?


Yes, because this right is an integral component of liberty.
Cobhanglica's top officials
President: George Rockwell
Sec. of Foreign Relations: Martin Lansing
Sec. of Defense: General James Arnold
Sec. of Trade: Henry Ford Smith


My Political Compass:
Economic Left/Right: 4.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 4.72

User avatar
WWII History Geeks
Minister
 
Posts: 2257
Founded: Mar 12, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby WWII History Geeks » Fri May 28, 2010 2:39 pm

Tsa-la-gi Nation wrote:
WWII History Geeks wrote:All of you would kill just to be able to say what you want to?

Once freedom of speech is gone, the powers that be can tell you what to think without a counter arguement.

I think I would...but only in a revolution-like situation.
The goldfish crackers will win. Do you know why they smile? Because when they get inside you they start eating you from the inside out.

Grandtaria: "I would rather live my life each day thinking there is a God and die to find out there isn't, than to live my thinking that there isn't and die to find out there is."
Conservative Morality: "When in Rome, do as the Romans. When out of Rome, do as the Romans anyway, it's not like anyone is ballsy enough to piss off Rome."

Finally fixed: The thread may be gone, but I'm still a "To Hell with This'er!," damnit! :D

Boob sisters with Celestial Divinities!

User avatar
Tsa-la-gi Nation
Minister
 
Posts: 2823
Founded: Aug 19, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Tsa-la-gi Nation » Fri May 28, 2010 2:39 pm

Carls-land wrote:
Straughn wrote:
Carls-land wrote:i would do everything to stop those who seek to have these ''right's''
What?

only the police and military should have guns

Who's police & military?

User avatar
Carls-land
Minister
 
Posts: 2087
Founded: Apr 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Carls-land » Fri May 28, 2010 2:41 pm

Tsa-la-gi Nation wrote:
Carls-land wrote:
Straughn wrote:
Carls-land wrote:i would do everything to stop those who seek to have these ''right's''
What?

only the police and military should have guns

Who's police & military?

any nation that is democratic

User avatar
Tsa-la-gi Nation
Minister
 
Posts: 2823
Founded: Aug 19, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Tsa-la-gi Nation » Fri May 28, 2010 2:41 pm

WWII History Geeks wrote:
Tsa-la-gi Nation wrote:
WWII History Geeks wrote:All of you would kill just to be able to say what you want to?

Once freedom of speech is gone, the powers that be can tell you what to think without a counter arguement.

I think I would...but only in a revolution-like situation.

I agree. the right situation has to come up. If I would have live in the time of Eugene Debs, I would have rioted for his freedom.

User avatar
Gun Manufacturers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10140
Founded: Jan 23, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gun Manufacturers » Fri May 28, 2010 2:41 pm

Carls-land wrote:
Straughn wrote:
Carls-land wrote:i would do everything to stop those who seek to have these ''right's''
What?

only the police and military should have guns


The First Amendment does not address firearms, firearms are addressed by the Second Amendment. Please stick to discussion on the First Amendment.
Gun control is like trying to solve drunk driving by making it harder for sober people to own cars.

Any accident you can walk away from is one I can laugh at.

DOJ's interpretation of the 2nd Amendment: http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/fi ... -p0126.pdf

Natapoc wrote:...You should post more in here so I don't seem like the extremist...


Auraelius wrote:If you take the the TITANIC, and remove the letters T, T, and one of the I's, and add the letters C,O,S,P,R, and Y you get CONSPIRACY. oOooOooooOOOooooOOOOOOoooooooo


Maineiacs wrote:Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll sit in a boat and get drunk all day.


Luw wrote:Politics is like having two handfuls of shit - one that smells bad and one that looks bad - and having to decide which one to put in your mouth.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Beliras, DutchFormosa, Mergold-Aurlia, Singaporen Empire, Tiami, Tillania, Tungstan

Advertisement

Remove ads