Dysian wrote:well I am a newer raider.
No you are not a raider, you are an imperlialist.
But beside that point, do you think that it is sustainable what you are doing?
Advertisement
by Northern Chittowa » Thu Jun 25, 2009 2:23 pm
Dysian wrote:well I am a newer raider.
by Daynor » Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:40 pm
Northern Chittowa wrote:Dysian wrote:well I am a newer raider.
No you are not a raider, you are an imperlialist.
But beside that point, do you think that it is sustainable what you are doing?
by Zemnaya Svoboda » Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Numero Capitan wrote:Flems 60 day password idea is fairly good but I have another suggestion...
All founders can password their regions and delegates can only password the region with the support of the nation that has resided there longest. So a delegate would set a password and the nation there longest would been sent a telegram with an approve and a disapprove button for them to have the final say.
by Todd McCloud » Fri Jun 26, 2009 1:42 am
Dysian wrote:well I am a newer raider.
by Dysian » Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:30 am
by Romanar » Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:14 am
by Ellezelles » Fri Jun 26, 2009 5:23 am
Zemnaya Svoboda wrote:Numero Capitan wrote:Flems 60 day password idea is fairly good but I have another suggestion...
All founders can password their regions and delegates can only password the region with the support of the nation that has resided there longest. So a delegate would set a password and the nation there longest would been sent a telegram with an approve and a disapprove button for them to have the final say.
I don't think it's very reasonable to ask [violet] to implement something so radically different from how the game is structured.
Also, I don't think the nation longest residing should have much to do with it.
Getting rid of hidden password in general seems like an okay thing for me.
by New Galcia » Wed Jul 01, 2009 12:52 am
by Todd McCloud » Wed Jul 01, 2009 1:58 am
New Galcia wrote:Question:
Can founderless regions apply to admin for a new founder?
If not.......why not?
by West-Flanders » Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:17 am
by Veilyonia » Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:30 pm
West-Flanders wrote:Excellent question, I've been wondering about this for a few weeks now as well.. though Max doesn't return my calls
by Daynor » Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:37 pm
by Dysian » Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:28 am
Daynor wrote:Even if they could, wouldn't the raiders get to decide who the new founder was seeing as they control the region now?
by West-Flanders » Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:25 am
Daynor wrote:Even if they could, wouldn't the raiders get to decide who the new founder was seeing as they control the region now?
I think I was around when they were starting to impliment founders, but was banned (sorry) before it ever was, and came back a little while later... So I am not 100% sure how they let regions decide that...
Dysian wrote:Probably true, if they control it. And if it hasn't been taken by raiders, natives can always use the SIMPLE refound technique, instead of bothering the admins with things they can do themselves.
They're working for you for free guys, give them a break for goodness sake.
by Numero Capitan » Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:11 am
by Wallonia-Flanders » Sat Jul 04, 2009 4:00 am
Numero Capitan wrote:Currently the longest residing nation(s) has a lot to do with it because of influence which was implemented to protect these nations that have resided the longest. This has apparently not worked universally as France and Belgium show.
by West-Flanders » Sat Jul 04, 2009 12:25 pm
Wallonia-Flanders wrote:Numero Capitan wrote:Currently the longest residing nation(s) has a lot to do with it because of influence which was implemented to protect these nations that have resided the longest. This has apparently not worked universally as France and Belgium show.
actually, it has. I still can't kick them from their region.
by Dysian » Mon Jul 06, 2009 6:01 am
by Todd McCloud » Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:59 pm
Dysian wrote:of my badness WF, where is your fighting spirit?
You should say: ha ha, you will soon lose your endos and we will finally take our region back!
come on, dont give up
by Dysian » Tue Jul 07, 2009 9:41 am
by Todd McCloud » Tue Jul 07, 2009 10:08 am
Dysian wrote:I wont change my ways. And I know you wont do everything to make my game bitter, because that would imply that you become occupied with me. And I know even you won't fall that low (it would be cool though, to know that someone like Todd McCloud is obsessed with me).
I can tell you one thing: I will NOT stop raiding...
(if I were an offending hater, I'd add: "... unlike SOMEONE" to the upper phrase. but I'm really not that, I try to keep it fair with everyone)
by Dysian » Tue Jul 07, 2009 10:40 am
Dysian wrote:you can speculate about what I am all you want. I won't do it myself, because I find it pointless.
Words are not my plus side, I am a man of deeds. And deeds speak that I raid regions, regardless of how they end up.
by Northern Chittowa » Tue Jul 07, 2009 3:41 pm
Dysian wrote:I wont change my ways. And I know you wont do everything to make my game bitter, because that would imply that you become occupied with me. And I know even you won't fall that low (it would be cool though, to know that someone like Todd McCloud is obsessed with me).
I can tell you one thing: I will NOT stop raiding...
(if I were an offending hater, I'd add: "... unlike SOMEONE" to the upper phrase. but I'm really not that, I try to keep it fair with everyone)
by Dysian » Wed Jul 08, 2009 2:33 am
Northern Chittowa wrote:... afraid of actually playing the invader/defender game on a level which is fair and which is challenging.
by Goobergunchia » Wed Jul 08, 2009 3:05 am
Advertisement
Advertisement