Fordorsia wrote:Premislyd wrote:Then suddenly, something infantry-related was posted.
Guards mechanized infantry section (Revised; Present day)
Squad "A"
-Section leader (Sgt./Any derivative of Sgt.; TBK-022PM w/ 1.6x optic, basic infantry radio)
-GPMGer (Pvt./PFC.; Uk vz. 59L w/ 3.4x optic, 2 x 250 round belt)
-Ast. Rifleman (Spc..; TKB-022PM w/ 1.6x optic, 4 x 50 round belt)
-AT rifleman (Pvt./PFC.; TKB-022PM w/ 1.6x optic, 2 x 50 round belt, RPG-22)
-DMRman (Pvt./PFC.; SVDS w/ 4.8x optic, 2 x 50 round belt)
Squad "B"
-Squad leader/Section SiC (Jr. Sgt.; TKB-022PM w/ 1.6x optic)
-Grenadier (Pvt./PFC.; TKB-022PM w/ 1.6 optic, 4 x 5.5 cm direct fire rifle grenades [HE])
-Grenadier (Pvt./PFC.; TKB-022PM w/ 1.6 optic, 4 x 5.5 cm direct fire rifle grenades [HE])
-Rifleman (Pvt./PFC.; TKB-022PM w/ 1.6 optic, 2 x 5.5 cm direct fire rifle grenades [HE])
-Rifleman (Pvt./PFC.; TKB-022PM w/ 1.6 optic, 2 x 5.5 cm direct fire rifle grenades [HE])
Also, I'm surprised none of you brought up that Denmark picked the M60E4 over the HK121 to replace their MG 3s.
What kind of silly person replaces their MG-3s at all, let alone with the M60?
Easier control when firing (550 rpm [M60E4] compared to ~1200 rpm [MG 3]), also easier to conserve ammo and better accuracy.
According to the Danish army website, the M60E4 was more reliable.
Also, the M60E4 is about 3 kg lighter than the MG3.