NATION

PASSWORD

Top Anti-Gay Group Attempts Public Meeting Over LGBT Rights

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Ragnarum
Senator
 
Posts: 3890
Founded: Dec 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ragnarum » Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:40 pm

The Tovian Way wrote:
The Tovian Way wrote:
I'd leave the country and go elsewhere if I didn't like their policies or way of governance.


No doubt, in that situation that would be only rational. But would the actions of that person in power be, in your view, legitimate? That is to say, do you believe it is always a legitimate exercise of political power to deny free speech protections to those who disagree with the views of those in power?


Pretty much, yes they would be legitimate, except I wouldn't agree with them, and If I came into power (which wont happen anyway) I would just stop them existing as well.

I dont care whether its a democracy or dictatorship, so long as It supports my other beliefs.
Last edited by Ragnarum on Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Don't copy and paste anything you see in a sig you fucking normie scrub
I deliberately made the star asymmetrical.
AUF GEHTS KAMERADEN
Here are my factbooks (Lots of WIP)

Ragnarum is not communist or even particularly socialist, just so you know.

User avatar
Blasveck
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13877
Founded: Dec 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasveck » Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:41 pm

Totalise wrote:
Blasveck wrote:Because the people who oppose them are harming members of society for no logical reason.

Granted, they can spread hate all they want. They're in their full right to do so.

But they shouldn't act suprised when they get shit for it.

how is it harm? i see no harm in being against something i find moraly wrong.
prove that they spread hate. i believe that homosexuality is wrong, that dosen't mean i hate homosexuals.

I'm sure you're well aware of the violence that LGBT members have experienced, nevermind that attitudes expressed by groups mentioned in the OP only help to perpetuate that violence.
Forever a Communist

User avatar
Jormengand
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8414
Founded: May 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jormengand » Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:41 pm

Totalise wrote:
Jormengand wrote:Sexuality? No. When did you choose to be straight? Could you (for experimental purposes, of course) choose to be gay?

No. No you couldn't.

That said, I'd let you have every right to say what you want. Your right to swing your fist ends where my nose begins, and all that.

so its genetic then?

Uh, kind of. Also to do with conditions in the womb and such, but we think it's fixed at birth - in any case, no attempt at changing people's sexuality has ever succeeded.

Ever.
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57514
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Liriena » Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:41 pm

Totalise wrote:
Blasveck wrote:Because the people who oppose them are harming members of society for no logical reason.

Granted, they can spread hate all they want. They're in their full right to do so.

But they shouldn't act suprised when they get shit for it.

how is it harm? i see no harm in being against something i find moraly wrong.
prove that they spread hate. i believe that homosexuality is wrong, that dosen't mean i hate homosexuals.

"Love the sinner, hate the sin" is a pretty cowardly cop-out. That being said, denying LGBT people their human rights is most certainly harmful. It harms their mental health, their economic stability, their emotional development and that of their children, and can even lead to severe, widespread physical health problems.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
The Tovian Way
Diplomat
 
Posts: 558
Founded: Nov 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Tovian Way » Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:42 pm

Ragnarum wrote:
The Tovian Way wrote:
No doubt, in that situation that would be only rational. But would the actions of that person in power be, in your view, legitimate? That is to say, do you believe it is always a legitimate exercise of political power to deny free speech protections to those who disagree with the views of those in power?


Pretty much, yes they would be legitimate, except I wouldn't agree with them, and If I came into power (which wont happen anyway) I would just stop them existing completely.


Fascinating. I apologize for all the questions, I've just honestly never heard someone defend that position before.
I disagree with you, but I do give you credit for your consistency, it's an uncommon trait.
“A true opium for the people is a belief in nothingness after death – the huge solace of thinking that for our betrayals, greed, cowardice, murders we are not going to be judged.” – Czeslaw Milosz

"There are only two kinds of people in the end: those who say to God, 'Thy will be done,' and those to whom God says, in the end, 'Thy will be done.' " - C. S. Lewis

User avatar
The Tovian Way
Diplomat
 
Posts: 558
Founded: Nov 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Tovian Way » Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:43 pm

Liriena wrote:"Love the sinner, hate the sin" is a pretty cowardly cop-out.


Not so at all, it is rather an accurate expression of Christian teaching as regards to those who commit sin (i.e. everyone, with only a couple exceptions).
“A true opium for the people is a belief in nothingness after death – the huge solace of thinking that for our betrayals, greed, cowardice, murders we are not going to be judged.” – Czeslaw Milosz

"There are only two kinds of people in the end: those who say to God, 'Thy will be done,' and those to whom God says, in the end, 'Thy will be done.' " - C. S. Lewis

User avatar
Avenio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11113
Founded: Feb 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Avenio » Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:43 pm

Liriena wrote:
Avenio wrote:
To quote Karl Popper;

"Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal."

Thanks for reminding me why I love Popper. :3


I'll take any chance I get to pop out the Popper. :p

User avatar
The Treorai
Senator
 
Posts: 3706
Founded: Jul 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Treorai » Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:43 pm

Ragnarum wrote:
The Tovian Way wrote:
No doubt, in that situation that would be only rational. But would the actions of that person in power be, in your view, legitimate? That is to say, do you believe it is always a legitimate exercise of political power to deny free speech protections to those who disagree with the views of those in power?


Pretty much, yes they would be legitimate, except I wouldn't agree with them, and If I came into power (which wont happen anyway) I would just stop them existing as well.

I dont care whether its a democracy or dictatorship, so long as It supports my other beliefs.

"To stop you from suppressing the rights of others I will suppress your rights!"
Doubleplus good use of Doubletink, comrade.
GOD-KING OF ABRASIVENESS

Dumb Ideologies wrote:It's a situation intrinsic to the committed ideologue. Whenever one makes a counter-argument the goalposts seem not only to move in two dimensions but also float several hundred thousand miles above the pitch whilst wearing cast-iron earplugs.

Rainbows and Rivers wrote:Dictators blaming America for all their problems? That's new.

Caninope wrote:If I think in my mind that the book sitting in front of me is Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows when it is in fact Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised, 11th Edition, then it doesn't make me any more objectively correct.

User avatar
Totalise
Diplomat
 
Posts: 563
Founded: Jun 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Totalise » Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:44 pm

Blasveck wrote:
Totalise wrote:how is it harm? i see no harm in being against something i find moraly wrong.
prove that they spread hate. i believe that homosexuality is wrong, that dosen't mean i hate homosexuals.

I'm sure you're well aware of the violence that LGBT members have experienced, nevermind that attitudes expressed by groups mentioned in the OP only help to perpetuate that violence.

and the LGBT dosen't have a violant side? where i live its the other way around. in my high school a group of homosexual kids tried to beat me for disaggreeing with them and their life style choices.

User avatar
Ragnarum
Senator
 
Posts: 3890
Founded: Dec 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ragnarum » Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:44 pm

The Treorai wrote:
Ragnarum wrote:
Pretty much, yes they would be legitimate, except I wouldn't agree with them, and If I came into power (which wont happen anyway) I would just stop them existing as well.

I dont care whether its a democracy or dictatorship, so long as It supports my other beliefs.

"To stop you from suppressing the rights of others I will suppress your rights!"
Doubleplus good use of Doubletink, comrade.


Yes.

Thats actually my point.

Funny, I know.
Last edited by Ragnarum on Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Don't copy and paste anything you see in a sig you fucking normie scrub
I deliberately made the star asymmetrical.
AUF GEHTS KAMERADEN
Here are my factbooks (Lots of WIP)

Ragnarum is not communist or even particularly socialist, just so you know.

User avatar
The Treorai
Senator
 
Posts: 3706
Founded: Jul 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Treorai » Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:45 pm

Ragnarum wrote:
The Treorai wrote:"To stop you from suppressing the rights of others I will suppress your rights!"
Doubleplus good use of Doubletink, comrade.


Yes.

Thats actually my point.

And the point whistles right over your head.
GOD-KING OF ABRASIVENESS

Dumb Ideologies wrote:It's a situation intrinsic to the committed ideologue. Whenever one makes a counter-argument the goalposts seem not only to move in two dimensions but also float several hundred thousand miles above the pitch whilst wearing cast-iron earplugs.

Rainbows and Rivers wrote:Dictators blaming America for all their problems? That's new.

Caninope wrote:If I think in my mind that the book sitting in front of me is Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows when it is in fact Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised, 11th Edition, then it doesn't make me any more objectively correct.

User avatar
Blasveck
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13877
Founded: Dec 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasveck » Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:46 pm

Totalise wrote:
Blasveck wrote:I'm sure you're well aware of the violence that LGBT members have experienced, nevermind that attitudes expressed by groups mentioned in the OP only help to perpetuate that violence.

and the LGBT dosen't have a violant side? where i live its the other way around. in my high school a group of homosexual kids tried to beat me for disaggreeing with them and their life style choices.

Anecdotes aren't evidence son, and you completely miss the point.
Forever a Communist

User avatar
Ragnarum
Senator
 
Posts: 3890
Founded: Dec 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ragnarum » Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:46 pm

The Treorai wrote:
Ragnarum wrote:
Yes.

Thats actually my point.

And the point whistles right over your head.


Except not? :roll:

Your posts are pretty understandable.
Last edited by Ragnarum on Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Don't copy and paste anything you see in a sig you fucking normie scrub
I deliberately made the star asymmetrical.
AUF GEHTS KAMERADEN
Here are my factbooks (Lots of WIP)

Ragnarum is not communist or even particularly socialist, just so you know.

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57514
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Liriena » Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:46 pm

The Tovian Way wrote:
Liriena wrote:"Love the sinner, hate the sin" is a pretty cowardly cop-out.


Not so at all, it is rather an accurate expression of Christian teaching as regards to those who commit sin (i.e. everyone, with only a couple exceptions).

Accurate or not, it is quite the shift from the earlier passion for "hang, disembowel and burn the sodomites", which is still pretty much the norm for certain Christians, such as the always delightful Scott Lively. Taking into account just how vitriolic anti-LGBT sentiments used to be, and how sugar-coatedly dehumanizing they are now, it's quite clear that there's an element of fear of criticism in most anti-LGBT christians.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Totalise
Diplomat
 
Posts: 563
Founded: Jun 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Totalise » Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:46 pm

Jormengand wrote:
Totalise wrote:so its genetic then?

Uh, kind of. Also to do with conditions in the womb and such, but we think it's fixed at birth - in any case, no attempt at changing people's sexuality has ever succeeded.

Ever.

i think homosexuality being genetic would have been big news. i was always under the impression that it was choice, you know since i have yet to read an artical about it being genetic

User avatar
Menassa
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33369
Founded: Aug 11, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Menassa » Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:47 pm

“How long shall I bear with this evil congregation?”
Radical Monotheist
Their hollow inheritance.
This is my god and I shall exalt him
Jewish Discussion Thread בְּ
"A missionary uses the Bible like a drunk uses a lamppost, not so much for illumination, but for support"
"Imagine of a bunch of Zulu tribesmen told Congress how to read the Constitution, that's how it feels to a Jew when you tell us how to read our bible"
"God said: you must teach, as I taught, without a fee."
"Against your will you are formed, against your will you are born, against your will you live, against your will you die, and against your will you are destined to give a judgement and accounting before the king, king of all kings..."

User avatar
Blasveck
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13877
Founded: Dec 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasveck » Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:48 pm

Totalise wrote:
Jormengand wrote:Uh, kind of. Also to do with conditions in the womb and such, but we think it's fixed at birth - in any case, no attempt at changing people's sexuality has ever succeeded.

Ever.

i think homosexuality being genetic would have been big news. i was always under the impression that it was choice, you know since i have yet to read an artical about it being genetic

We're not quite sure yet. What we are sure of is that it is not a choce.
Forever a Communist

User avatar
Inruptus
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 105
Founded: Oct 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Inruptus » Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:48 pm

Why can't these douches realize that they lost the fight over gay rights?
Economic Left/Right: -6.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.82

PRO: American Liberalism, LIMITED Gun Ownership, Reproductive Rights, LGBT Rights, Secularism, Alternative Energy, Palestine, Chechnya, Environment, Racial Equality, Rainbow Nation, Bill Clinton, Lyndon B. Johnson, Nelson Mandela, Stephen Colbert, Right Wing Watch, 1st Amendment, Anime, Hetalia, METAL_\m/
ANTI: Big Money in Politics, Tea Party, US Republican Party, US Democratic Party, Russia, North Korea, Religion in Politics, Racism, Homophobia, Transphobia, Misogyny, War, US government in General, Conspiracy theories, Religious Right, Israel and it's support from the US, Ronald Reagan, George Bush, Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachmann, Vladimir Putin, Large Corporations
MEH: Obama, Anarchism, Communism

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57514
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Liriena » Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:48 pm

Totalise wrote:i was always under the impression that it was choice, you know since i have yet to read an artical about it being genetic

That's a very poor logical structure right there.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Arcadonisia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1453
Founded: Jan 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Arcadonisia » Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:49 pm

Totalise wrote:
Jormengand wrote:Uh, kind of. Also to do with conditions in the womb and such, but we think it's fixed at birth - in any case, no attempt at changing people's sexuality has ever succeeded.

Ever.

i think homosexuality being genetic would have been big news. i was always under the impression that it was choice, you know since i have yet to read an artical about it being genetic


Why would it be a choice?
DEFCON: [1][2][3][4][5]
I'm a FanT/MT nation. RP Population: 320,000,000
Economic Left/Right: -5.88 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.41
XENO AND A MEMBER OF THE MULTI-SPECIES UNION!

User avatar
The Treorai
Senator
 
Posts: 3706
Founded: Jul 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Treorai » Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:49 pm

Ragnarum wrote:
The Treorai wrote:And the point whistles right over your head.


Except not? :roll:

Your posts are pretty understandable.

If you had understood it, you would know I was comparing your statement to that of something in George Orwell's 1984.
GOD-KING OF ABRASIVENESS

Dumb Ideologies wrote:It's a situation intrinsic to the committed ideologue. Whenever one makes a counter-argument the goalposts seem not only to move in two dimensions but also float several hundred thousand miles above the pitch whilst wearing cast-iron earplugs.

Rainbows and Rivers wrote:Dictators blaming America for all their problems? That's new.

Caninope wrote:If I think in my mind that the book sitting in front of me is Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows when it is in fact Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised, 11th Edition, then it doesn't make me any more objectively correct.

User avatar
Ragnarum
Senator
 
Posts: 3890
Founded: Dec 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ragnarum » Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:50 pm

The Treorai wrote:
Ragnarum wrote:
Except not? :roll:

Your posts are pretty understandable.

If you had understood it, you would know I was comparing your statement to that of something in George Orwell's 1984.


Never read it.

Most people haven't.
Don't copy and paste anything you see in a sig you fucking normie scrub
I deliberately made the star asymmetrical.
AUF GEHTS KAMERADEN
Here are my factbooks (Lots of WIP)

Ragnarum is not communist or even particularly socialist, just so you know.

User avatar
Totalise
Diplomat
 
Posts: 563
Founded: Jun 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Totalise » Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:53 pm

Liriena wrote:
Totalise wrote:i was always under the impression that it was choice, you know since i have yet to read an artical about it being genetic

That's a very poor logical structure right there.

as i am not an expert in the feild of human psychology nor genetics i can only go off of what Experts in those feilds have written on the subject, and all of the articals i had read suggested that it was a choice as there is no data supporting it as genetic and few if any genetisists have wanted to take up the manttle of such a task.

User avatar
The Tovian Way
Diplomat
 
Posts: 558
Founded: Nov 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Tovian Way » Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:53 pm

Liriena wrote:
The Tovian Way wrote:
Not so at all, it is rather an accurate expression of Christian teaching as regards to those who commit sin (i.e. everyone, with only a couple exceptions).

Accurate or not, it is quite the shift from the earlier passion for "hang, disembowel and burn the sodomites", which is still pretty much the norm for certain Christians, such as the always delightful Scott Lively. Taking into account just how vitriolic anti-LGBT sentiments used to be, and how sugar-coatedly dehumanizing they are now, it's quite clear that there's an element of fear of criticism in most anti-LGBT christians.


Those who call for hanging, disemboweling and burning sodomites are acting outside the teachings of Christianity. They themselves might be Christians, but insofar as they call for such actions, they are not doing so as Christians, even if they claim otherwise.
Sexual orientation is largely outside of our control, and thus cannot result in moral culpability.
Our actions are within our control, and thus can result in moral culpability.
Those with a tendency toward sinful actions, such as those born with a homosexual orientation, are never morally culpable for this tendency, but are morally culpable for actually engaging in these actions. One with a homosexual orientation who did not ever engage in homosexual sexual activity would be completely blameless as regards this particular sin.
“A true opium for the people is a belief in nothingness after death – the huge solace of thinking that for our betrayals, greed, cowardice, murders we are not going to be judged.” – Czeslaw Milosz

"There are only two kinds of people in the end: those who say to God, 'Thy will be done,' and those to whom God says, in the end, 'Thy will be done.' " - C. S. Lewis

User avatar
Menassa
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33369
Founded: Aug 11, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Menassa » Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:53 pm

The Tovian Way wrote:
Liriena wrote:"Love the sinner, hate the sin" is a pretty cowardly cop-out.


Not so at all, it is rather an accurate expression of Christian teaching as regards to those who commit sin (i.e. everyone, with only a couple exceptions).

Everyone is 'in sin' so it really doesn't matter if they 'commit' sin.
Radical Monotheist
Their hollow inheritance.
This is my god and I shall exalt him
Jewish Discussion Thread בְּ
"A missionary uses the Bible like a drunk uses a lamppost, not so much for illumination, but for support"
"Imagine of a bunch of Zulu tribesmen told Congress how to read the Constitution, that's how it feels to a Jew when you tell us how to read our bible"
"God said: you must teach, as I taught, without a fee."
"Against your will you are formed, against your will you are born, against your will you live, against your will you die, and against your will you are destined to give a judgement and accounting before the king, king of all kings..."

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aureumterra, Cannot think of a name, Cekoviu, Cerisan, Communal concils, Eternal Lotharia, Fahran, Forumland, Gagium, Genivaria, GinetV6, Hakons, Heloin, Ifreann, Kowani, Luminesa, Nakena, Narland, New Elesar, Pasong Tirad, Perchan, Prosorusiya, Shrillland, Stellar Colonies, Sternesyndikat, The East Marches II, The New California Republic, The United States of Paul, Totenborg, Uiiop, United States of Devonta, Valtrona, Victoriamus, Volsar, Xmara, Xuloqoia, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads