NATION

PASSWORD

The "Repeal Condemn Macedon" Proposal

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.
Post a reply
User avatar
Belzia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1322
Founded: Sep 28, 2013
Ex-Nation

The "Repeal Condemn Macedon" Proposal

Postby Belzia » Sun Sep 29, 2013 7:24 pm

I saw this good proposal floating around with 2 yeses out of the 77 needed on it and I think it would be good to support. It goes as follows.

SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: adaloupe_1380473069
Repeal "Condemn Macedon"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.


Category: Repeal


Resolution: SC#1


Proposed by: Adaloupe

Description: WA Security Council Resolution #1: Condemn Macedon shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: To the Security Council:

NOTING that Macedon is not really a threat to the world as it contains only one nation.

ALSO NOTING that the world factbook has been changed since the condemnation.

DOUBTING that condemnations should be written with any beliefs.

HEREBY REPEALS: SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION #1: Condemn Macedon
Poni Poni Poni
Generation 35 (The first time you see this, copy it into your signature on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.)
98% of all Internet users would cry if Facebook broke down. If you are part of that 2% who simply would sit back and laugh, copy and paste this into your signature.
Armed Forces data
Defcon: 5 4 3 2 1
Left: 5.16, Libertarian: 1.87
I am a Catholic
Top
User avatar
Abacathea
Minister
 
Posts: 2151
Founded: Nov 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Abacathea » Sun Sep 29, 2013 8:12 pm

If you're doubting whether a proposal should contain a belief yoire essentially adding your own are you not?

Also I remember the previous draft and if I remember correctly it was nayed by some of the bigger delegates very quickly here which is where matters. 77 approvals is piss easy to get.

Find a better target if you're looking for an SC authorship. This isn't it.
G.A #236; Renewable Energy Installations (Repealed)
G.A #239; Vehicle Emissions Convention (Repealed).
G.A #257; Reducing Automobile Emissions (Repealed).
G.A #263; Uranium Mining Standards Act
G.A #279; Right of Emigration
G.A #292; Nuclear Security Convention (Co-Author)
G.A #363; Preservation of Artefacts (repealed)
S.C #118; Commend SkyDip
S.C #120; Commend Mousebumples
S.C #122; Condemn Gest
S.C #124; Commend Bears Armed
S.C #125; Commend The Bruce
S.C #126; Commend Sanctaria
S.C #131: Commend NewTexas (Co-Author)
S.C #136; Repeal "Liberate St Abbaddon" (Co-Author)
S.C #143; Commend Hobbesistan
S.C #146; Repeal "Liberate Hogwarts"
Top
User avatar
Ukko
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 12
Founded: May 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ukko » Sun Sep 29, 2013 8:57 pm

Against.

Macedon still holds region Finland as a trophy Among other regions) after ten years. If something is condemnable in principle at all, then such thing is Something absolutely Condemnworthy. :lol:

Condemnation resolution SC#1 should be kept untouched and unchanged for showing some respect for The Macedon... As a Badge of Honor. :clap:
Founder of Suomi
Top
User avatar
SkyDip
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1735
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby SkyDip » Mon Sep 30, 2013 6:38 am

This also still stands as a bit of nostalgia for a lot of folks. I'm against the repeal.
Elias Thaddeus Greyjoy, WA Ambassador of SkyDip
Read my Guide to the Security Council, a comprehensive collection of history, tactics, and tips for the Security Council!


Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.

Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.

Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.

Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
Top
User avatar
Frattastan II
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1039
Founded: Nov 27, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Frattastan II » Tue Oct 01, 2013 7:44 am

Is it even a proposal "written from the perspective of the World Assembly" if the opening clause is "To the Security Council"?
Rejected Realms Army High Commander
(So you've been ejected..., forum, news, RRA)
<@Guy> well done, fuckhead.
* @Guy claps for frattastan
Top
User avatar
Imperial States of the Empire
Attaché
 
Posts: 83
Founded: Oct 28, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperial States of the Empire » Tue Oct 01, 2013 7:58 am

Certainly this proposal must be a joke. I doubt that anyone with a right state of mind will approve this proposal. Currently in needs over 60 votes and has only a day and some hours to be approved.
INN: | Maple Leaf Riots Intensify | A7 Conference Success? | Tax Cuts? | Hunterian Leader Poisoned |
Top
User avatar
Belzia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1322
Founded: Sep 28, 2013
Ex-Nation

a note

Postby Belzia » Tue Oct 01, 2013 3:08 pm

I didn't write this, just to clarify. I just thought it had some purpose.
Poni Poni Poni
Generation 35 (The first time you see this, copy it into your signature on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.)
98% of all Internet users would cry if Facebook broke down. If you are part of that 2% who simply would sit back and laugh, copy and paste this into your signature.
Armed Forces data
Defcon: 5 4 3 2 1
Left: 5.16, Libertarian: 1.87
I am a Catholic
Top
User avatar
Feux
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1594
Founded: Mar 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Feux » Tue Oct 01, 2013 6:22 pm

Something in my heart doesn't want the first SC proposal replied. Not sure why yet.
Always Changing Shapes
TheBestDudeInHistory wrote:Feux is what would happen if I had my shitposting physically removed, isolated, and permitted to become sentient on its own. And I mean that in the best way possible. Clearly I need to marry Feux.
Top
User avatar
Charax
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1006
Founded: Apr 20, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Charax » Wed Oct 02, 2013 3:37 am

Feux wrote:Something in my heart doesn't want the first SC proposal replied. Not sure why yet.

I know what you mean. It'd feel wrong, somehow.

Opposed.
Minister of WA Affairs, Balder
◆◆◆
Top
User avatar
Sedgistan
Site Director
 
Posts: 35471
Founded: Oct 20, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Sedgistan » Wed Oct 02, 2013 4:47 am

Frattastan II wrote:Is it even a proposal "written from the perspective of the World Assembly" if the opening clause is "To the Security Council"?

Really pedantic, but you're right. Proposal removed.
Top
User avatar
SkyDip
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1735
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby SkyDip » Wed Oct 02, 2013 6:38 am

Sedgistan wrote:
Frattastan II wrote:Is it even a proposal "written from the perspective of the World Assembly" if the opening clause is "To the Security Council"?

Really pedantic, but you're right. Proposal removed.

Bastard Mod strikes again. :P
Elias Thaddeus Greyjoy, WA Ambassador of SkyDip
Read my Guide to the Security Council, a comprehensive collection of history, tactics, and tips for the Security Council!


Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.

Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.

Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.

Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
Top
User avatar
Abacathea
Minister
 
Posts: 2151
Founded: Nov 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Abacathea » Thu Oct 03, 2013 5:46 am

Belzia wrote:I didn't write this, just to clarify. I just thought it had some purpose.


This comment confuses me, If you didn't write it, who did? Why are you posting it and who is the Organ Grinder behind the monkey in that case?
G.A #236; Renewable Energy Installations (Repealed)
G.A #239; Vehicle Emissions Convention (Repealed).
G.A #257; Reducing Automobile Emissions (Repealed).
G.A #263; Uranium Mining Standards Act
G.A #279; Right of Emigration
G.A #292; Nuclear Security Convention (Co-Author)
G.A #363; Preservation of Artefacts (repealed)
S.C #118; Commend SkyDip
S.C #120; Commend Mousebumples
S.C #122; Condemn Gest
S.C #124; Commend Bears Armed
S.C #125; Commend The Bruce
S.C #126; Commend Sanctaria
S.C #131: Commend NewTexas (Co-Author)
S.C #136; Repeal "Liberate St Abbaddon" (Co-Author)
S.C #143; Commend Hobbesistan
S.C #146; Repeal "Liberate Hogwarts"
Top
User avatar
Imperial States of the Empire
Attaché
 
Posts: 83
Founded: Oct 28, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperial States of the Empire » Thu Oct 03, 2013 10:33 am

Sedgistan wrote:
Frattastan II wrote:Is it even a proposal "written from the perspective of the World Assembly" if the opening clause is "To the Security Council"?

Really pedantic, but you're right. Proposal removed.

Finally some action has been taken
INN: | Maple Leaf Riots Intensify | A7 Conference Success? | Tax Cuts? | Hunterian Leader Poisoned |
Top
Post a reply

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Advertisement

Remove ads