Also, if you have title suggestions, feel free to shout them out (figuratively speaking). I totally blanked that there was already a thread entitled as such in the SC.
by SkyDip » Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:41 am
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by SkyDip » Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:43 am
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by SkyDip » Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:45 am
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by SkyDip » Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:46 am
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by SkyDip » Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:49 am
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by SkyDip » Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:49 am
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by SkyDip » Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:50 am
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by SkyDip » Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:50 am
[proposal=talorin_1390307267]Link text here![/proposal]
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by SkyDip » Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:51 am
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by SkyDip » Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:52 am
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by SkyDip » Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:52 am
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by SkyDip » Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:52 am
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by SkyDip » Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:54 am
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by Jack Holland » Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:56 am
by SkyDip » Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:57 am
Jack Holland wrote:The Mods already have put up a thread similar to this. This will likely be locked
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=218040
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=79106
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=8809
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by Unibot III » Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:58 am
Of those eight, four (Democratia, Utopia, Nationalist Union, and Republicans) have been refounded and have active Founder nations, rendering those Liberations essentially useless.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by SkyDip » Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:59 am
Unibot III wrote:Of those eight, four (Democratia, Utopia, Nationalist Union, and Republicans) have been refounded and have active Founder nations, rendering those Liberations essentially useless.
Liberations aren't useless -- in fact repeals of liberations on the basis of them being useless are in fact useless repeals. >_>
They serve only to make those regions less secure by taking away a source of defense for them in preparation of their founder CTE'ing.
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by Unibot III » Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:09 am
SkyDip wrote:Unibot III wrote:
Liberations aren't useless -- in fact repeals of liberations on the basis of them being useless are in fact useless repeals. >_>
They serve only to make those regions less secure by taking away a source of defense for them in preparation of their founder CTE'ing.
Emphasis mine. It's a matter of perspective, really, and it's this author's perspective that's being written.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Euroslavia » Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:10 am
SkyDip wrote:Unibot III wrote:
Liberations aren't useless -- in fact repeals of liberations on the basis of them being useless are in fact useless repeals. >_>
They serve only to make those regions less secure by taking away a source of defense for them in preparation of their founder CTE'ing.
Emphasis mine. It's a matter of perspective, really, and it's this author's perspective that's being written.
by SkyDip » Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:12 am
Euroslavia wrote:<snip>
Unibot III wrote:<snip>
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by Unibot III » Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:20 am
SkyDip wrote:Euroslavia wrote:<snip>Unibot III wrote:<snip>
Indeed - that will be a primary goal early, and I welcome Unibot's input as he's just as prolific (if not more so) in the SC than I. Content revisions I will be working on as well, though I'd like to get a more unbiased opinion than his on his this particular point (sorry, Uni).
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by SkyDip » Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:23 am
Unibot III wrote:What -is- up for dispute is whether The World Assembly should (1) by default, respect the merits of this preemptive measure, (2) respect the wishes of natives to maintain a WA Liberation given the (controversial) merits of a preemptive measure.
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by SkyDip » Fri Sep 13, 2013 10:40 am
rendering those Liberations essentially pointless except as a pre-emptive measure should the Founder nation cease to exist
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by Jack Holland » Fri Sep 13, 2013 11:09 am
by Abacathea » Fri Sep 13, 2013 12:06 pm
Unibot III wrote:Most defenderists would say, sure.. why not keep the badge while it's there anyway? Most raiderists, who want the SC to help regions as little as possible, will try to argue the repeal on the grounds of "cleaning the books" alone.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement