NATION

PASSWORD

Philosophic Question:Solve It!

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Pensalum
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1331
Founded: Jul 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Pensalum » Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:38 pm

Need a name wrote:Gah! You don't understand at all. Good bye.

See, that's something someone would say when they're not arguing.
I read the worst thing ever in a bathrobe of off-white terrycloth

User avatar
With Teeth
Minister
 
Posts: 2475
Founded: Jul 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby With Teeth » Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:38 pm

Need a name wrote:
Skrewalkers wrote:
I particularly enjoy how they went from this:


Declaring the matter solved, to quickly shifting gears to:

"I don't have time to debate! I need three hours! I need to read more books! I don't have time to debate!"

when confronted with several reasons the matter is not so easily solved.

I really think this might be an atheist here pretending to be Christian to make Christians look bad.

Gah! You don't understand at all. Good bye.


You don't understand, but I won't tell you why!
My blog
I'm an atheist. When I defend theological arguments for fun, don't make cliche New Atheist remarks about theistic biases or trying to cover up gaps to save my "belief". You'll just look stupid.

User avatar
Skrewalkers
Envoy
 
Posts: 268
Founded: Aug 20, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Skrewalkers » Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:44 pm

With Teeth wrote:
You don't understand, but I won't tell you why!


Maybe it's a Zen koan.

Repeating it to myself...repeating...repeating....repeating it...

Okay, my mind is clear. I'm enlightened.





No, shit, wait, I've lost it.

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38270
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Rich Port » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:44 pm

My philosophy professor told me philosophical questions aren't something you can solve. He had a Ph.D, so I trust him.

But, I'll give it a shot.

FUCKING DUH.
THOSE THAT SOW THORNS SHOULD NOT EXPECT FLOWERS
CONSERVATISM IS FEAR AND STAGNATION AS IDEOLOGY. ONLY MARCH FORWARD.

Pronouns: She/Her
The Alt-Right Playbook
Alt-right/racist terminology
LOVEWHOYOUARE~

User avatar
With Teeth
Minister
 
Posts: 2475
Founded: Jul 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby With Teeth » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:44 pm

The Rich Port wrote:My philosophy professor told me philosophical questions aren't something you can solve. He had a Ph.D, so I trust him.

But, I'll give it a shot.

FUCKING DUH.


I disagree with him.
My blog
I'm an atheist. When I defend theological arguments for fun, don't make cliche New Atheist remarks about theistic biases or trying to cover up gaps to save my "belief". You'll just look stupid.

User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:45 pm

“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”

~Epicurus


I think this pretty much "answers" it.
Last edited by Pandeeria on Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

User avatar
Blasveck
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13877
Founded: Dec 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasveck » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:46 pm

Pandeeria wrote:“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”

~Epicurus


"A witty saying proves nothing."

-Voltaire
Forever a Communist

User avatar
With Teeth
Minister
 
Posts: 2475
Founded: Jul 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby With Teeth » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:46 pm

Pandeeria wrote:“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”

~Epicurus


1: It did not come from Epicurus.
2: God can have morally sufficient reasons for allowing evil, making the logical problem of evil unsound.
My blog
I'm an atheist. When I defend theological arguments for fun, don't make cliche New Atheist remarks about theistic biases or trying to cover up gaps to save my "belief". You'll just look stupid.

User avatar
With Teeth
Minister
 
Posts: 2475
Founded: Jul 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby With Teeth » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:46 pm

Blasveck wrote:
Pandeeria wrote:“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”

~Epicurus


"A witty saying proves nothing."

-Voltaire


''A witty saying from Voltaire proves nothing.'' -With Teeth
My blog
I'm an atheist. When I defend theological arguments for fun, don't make cliche New Atheist remarks about theistic biases or trying to cover up gaps to save my "belief". You'll just look stupid.

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38270
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Rich Port » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:47 pm

With Teeth wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:My philosophy professor told me philosophical questions aren't something you can solve. He had a Ph.D, so I trust him.

But, I'll give it a shot.

FUCKING DUH.


I disagree with him.


Uh, so do I.

That was the joke. :?
THOSE THAT SOW THORNS SHOULD NOT EXPECT FLOWERS
CONSERVATISM IS FEAR AND STAGNATION AS IDEOLOGY. ONLY MARCH FORWARD.

Pronouns: She/Her
The Alt-Right Playbook
Alt-right/racist terminology
LOVEWHOYOUARE~

User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:47 pm

With Teeth wrote:
Pandeeria wrote:“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”

~Epicurus


1: It did not come from Epicurus.
2: God can have morally sufficient reasons for allowing evil, making the logical problem of evil unsound.


I believe it was from Epicurus.

What morally sufficient reasons are there for allowing evil in the first place?
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:47 pm

Pandeeria wrote:“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”

~Epicurus


I think this pretty much "answers" it.

"I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things." ~Isaiah 45:7
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
Smoya
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7273
Founded: Jul 16, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Smoya » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:48 pm

Pandeeria wrote:“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”

~Epicurus


I think this pretty much "answers" it.

Do the last time, he doesn't not control our lives. We are supposed to make the right decisions in life.
Visit Sunalaya!

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38270
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Rich Port » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:49 pm

Vazdania wrote:
Pandeeria wrote:“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”

~Epicurus


I think this pretty much "answers" it.

"I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things." ~Isaiah 45:7


"This shit is bananas: B-A-N-A-N-A-S" - Gwen Stefani on The Bible.
THOSE THAT SOW THORNS SHOULD NOT EXPECT FLOWERS
CONSERVATISM IS FEAR AND STAGNATION AS IDEOLOGY. ONLY MARCH FORWARD.

Pronouns: She/Her
The Alt-Right Playbook
Alt-right/racist terminology
LOVEWHOYOUARE~

User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:49 pm

Smoya wrote:
Pandeeria wrote:“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”

~Epicurus


I think this pretty much "answers" it.

Do the last time, he doesn't not control our lives. We are supposed to make the right decisions in life.


But why does god allow evil? Why does he allow sin? Why does it allow that when everyone can be happy (and still control their lives) without burning in hell?
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

User avatar
Blasveck
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13877
Founded: Dec 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasveck » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:50 pm

With Teeth wrote:
Blasveck wrote:
"A witty saying proves nothing."

-Voltaire


''A witty saying from Voltaire proves nothing.'' -With Teeth


"That's precisely the fucking point."
-Blas
Forever a Communist

User avatar
Smoya
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7273
Founded: Jul 16, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Smoya » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:51 pm

Pandeeria wrote:
Smoya wrote:Do the last time, he doesn't not control our lives. We are supposed to make the right decisions in life.


But why does god allow evil? Why does he allow sin? Why does it allow that when everyone can be happy (and still control their lives) without burning in hell?

He can't stop us from committing evil acts. It's OUR lives. He can't control is, but to help guide us. Think of a parent. They can't stop their child from being bad. When they do they spank them; but the parent always loves the child even in spankings.

See?
Visit Sunalaya!

User avatar
Christmahanikwanzikah
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12073
Founded: Nov 24, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Christmahanikwanzikah » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:51 pm

Pandeeria wrote:
Smoya wrote:Do the last time, he doesn't not control our lives. We are supposed to make the right decisions in life.


But why does god allow evil? Why does he allow sin? Why does it allow that when everyone can be happy (and still control their lives) without burning in hell?


How are we more readily changed? By positive experiences, or painful experiences?

User avatar
With Teeth
Minister
 
Posts: 2475
Founded: Jul 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby With Teeth » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:52 pm

Pandeeria wrote:
With Teeth wrote:
1: It did not come from Epicurus.
2: God can have morally sufficient reasons for allowing evil, making the logical problem of evil unsound.


I believe it was from Epicurus.

What morally sufficient reasons are there for allowing evil in the first place?


All that needs to be asserted is the modal possibility that morally sufficient reasons exist. As an omniscient being, god would understand more than we do. You have to show that gratuitous evil exists.
My blog
I'm an atheist. When I defend theological arguments for fun, don't make cliche New Atheist remarks about theistic biases or trying to cover up gaps to save my "belief". You'll just look stupid.

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38270
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Rich Port » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:52 pm

Smoya wrote:
Pandeeria wrote:“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”

~Epicurus


I think this pretty much "answers" it.

Do the last time, he doesn't not control our lives. We are supposed to make the right decisions in life.


That's weird, because he sticks his big Godly nose in everyone's business in The Bible.

Hell, he's had his nose up the ass of humanity since CREATION.
THOSE THAT SOW THORNS SHOULD NOT EXPECT FLOWERS
CONSERVATISM IS FEAR AND STAGNATION AS IDEOLOGY. ONLY MARCH FORWARD.

Pronouns: She/Her
The Alt-Right Playbook
Alt-right/racist terminology
LOVEWHOYOUARE~

User avatar
Jamessonia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7702
Founded: Jun 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Jamessonia » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:52 pm

Prins Maurits wrote:This is a good question :

If God was completely good then he would want to stop all evil, if God was completely powerful then he could stop all evil, but evil exists....so does that mean that God is not completely good or not completely powerful, or does god not exist?

Please post your ideas about this question!

God doesn't exist, but not because of this. If God did exist he certainly would not be all good.
Last edited by Max Stirner on Thu June 26, 1856, edited 48 times in total.
Economic Left/Right: -6.5
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.31
“We are convinced that liberty without socialism is privilege, injustice; and that socialism without liberty is slavery and brutality.”
- Mikhail Bakunin


"I shall find enough anyhow who unite with me without swearing allegiance to my flag."
- Max Stirner

User avatar
With Teeth
Minister
 
Posts: 2475
Founded: Jul 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby With Teeth » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:52 pm

Blasveck wrote:
With Teeth wrote:
''A witty saying from Voltaire proves nothing.'' -With Teeth


"That's precisely the fucking point."
-Blas


''I'm making a joke, Blas.'' - With Teeth
My blog
I'm an atheist. When I defend theological arguments for fun, don't make cliche New Atheist remarks about theistic biases or trying to cover up gaps to save my "belief". You'll just look stupid.

User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:54 pm

With Teeth wrote:
Pandeeria wrote:
I believe it was from Epicurus.

What morally sufficient reasons are there for allowing evil in the first place?


All that needs to be asserted is the modal possibility that morally sufficient reasons exist. As an omniscient being, god would understand more than we do. You have to show that gratuitous evil exists.


So just assume that he knows better than us? What of the fact that religion has no true supporting evidence?
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

User avatar
Blasveck
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13877
Founded: Dec 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasveck » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:54 pm

Christmahanikwanzikah wrote:
Pandeeria wrote:
But why does god allow evil? Why does he allow sin? Why does it allow that when everyone can be happy (and still control their lives) without burning in hell?


How are we more readily changed? By positive experiences, or painful experiences?


Well if we look at recidivism rates concerning crime vs rehab, that could be a basis.

Prison = Painful
Rehab = Positive

If that makes sense, at all.
Forever a Communist

User avatar
With Teeth
Minister
 
Posts: 2475
Founded: Jul 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby With Teeth » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:57 pm

Pandeeria wrote:
With Teeth wrote:
All that needs to be asserted is the modal possibility that morally sufficient reasons exist. As an omniscient being, god would understand more than we do. You have to show that gratuitous evil exists.


So just assume that he knows better than us? What of the fact that religion has no true supporting evidence?


Assume that the premises ''gratuitous evil exists'' has not been supported.
My blog
I'm an atheist. When I defend theological arguments for fun, don't make cliche New Atheist remarks about theistic biases or trying to cover up gaps to save my "belief". You'll just look stupid.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Cyptopir, Eahland, El Lazaro, Emotional Support Crocodile, General TN, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Google [Bot], Herador, Hidrandia, La Paz de Los Ricos, Maximum Imperium Rex, Mergold-Aurlia, New Technocratic Prussia, Plan Neonie, Uiiop, United Desri

Advertisement

Remove ads