Advertisement
by Armenia II » Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:43 am
☭
☻/
/▌
/ \
Hey Trans, will the next TET not have a sucky name?
Considering that someone bitches about every name no matter what it is?
Probably not.
Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:Armenia II - not funny.
by Wikkiwallana » Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:44 am
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.
by Reino do Brazil » Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:49 am
Indira wrote:Biofuels, assuming we can get them from sources that don't effect our food supply
Yes, but there's prob a food crisis coming and Bio-Fuel take huge amounts of good land production
by Eoghania » Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:52 am
by Armenia II » Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:54 am
Eoghania wrote:Hydrogen. Clean, efficient, only issue is how to store the damn stuff.
☭
☻/
/▌
/ \
Hey Trans, will the next TET not have a sucky name?
Considering that someone bitches about every name no matter what it is?
Probably not.
Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:Armenia II - not funny.
by Armenia II » Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:55 am
☭
☻/
/▌
/ \
Hey Trans, will the next TET not have a sucky name?
Considering that someone bitches about every name no matter what it is?
Probably not.
Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:Armenia II - not funny.
by Armenia II » Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:57 am
☭
☻/
/▌
/ \
Hey Trans, will the next TET not have a sucky name?
Considering that someone bitches about every name no matter what it is?
Probably not.
Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:Armenia II - not funny.
by Hansoplis » Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:05 am
by Armenia II » Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:08 am
Hansoplis wrote:While I vote for Hydrogen, I think I will give you all this little nugget of knoledge.
Tesla near the end of his life claimed to have invented a generator that DID NOT REQUIRE FUEL!
He claimed it harnessed the "natural energies of the univers" or to be more specific COSMIC RAYS!
It was all part of his "Free electricity for everyone idea" that J.P. Morgan shot down.
☭
☻/
/▌
/ \
Hey Trans, will the next TET not have a sucky name?
Considering that someone bitches about every name no matter what it is?
Probably not.
Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:Armenia II - not funny.
by Big Jim P » Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:12 am
Armenia II wrote:Hansoplis wrote:While I vote for Hydrogen, I think I will give you all this little nugget of knoledge.
Tesla near the end of his life claimed to have invented a generator that DID NOT REQUIRE FUEL!
He claimed it harnessed the "natural energies of the univers" or to be more specific COSMIC RAYS!
It was all part of his "Free electricity for everyone idea" that J.P. Morgan shot down.
Oh, yeah, you can gather energy from the universe, not in the least efficient, though.
by Reino do Brazil » Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:07 am
by Armenia II » Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:09 am
☭
☻/
/▌
/ \
Hey Trans, will the next TET not have a sucky name?
Considering that someone bitches about every name no matter what it is?
Probably not.
Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:Armenia II - not funny.
by Reino do Brazil » Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:10 am
hadnt had the time to correct it, cheers
by Armenia II » Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:17 am
☭
☻/
/▌
/ \
Hey Trans, will the next TET not have a sucky name?
Considering that someone bitches about every name no matter what it is?
Probably not.
Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:Armenia II - not funny.
by Fintanland » Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:48 am
Hansoplis wrote:Tesla near the end of his life claimed to have invented a generator that DID NOT REQUIRE FUEL!
by Screensaver » Mon Mar 11, 2013 1:19 pm
by Fintanland » Mon Mar 11, 2013 1:28 pm
Screensaver wrote:I am surprised that no one has brought up the prospect of cars powered by HHO gas.
by Screensaver » Mon Mar 11, 2013 1:29 pm
by YellowApple » Mon Mar 11, 2013 1:30 pm
by Vitaphone Racing » Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:17 pm
Big Jim P wrote:Vitaphone Racing wrote:Unless you plan on combusting the hydrogen (which is dumb on so many levels) the same dangers posed by crashed electric cars will be present in hydrogen cars. There is still an electric transmission and most likely a battery pack.
Why is combusting hydrogen dumb? I am assuming you mean using it as we use gasoline, in an internal combustion engine. That produces water vapor for exhaust. In fact, the only downside I can think of is a lack of energy density in hydrogen fuel.
Parhe wrote:Guess what, maybe you don't know what it is like to be Asian.
by Eoghania » Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:23 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Cerula, Emotional Support Crocodile, Europa Undivided, Gabeonia, Kalenl, Tepertopia, The Archregimancy, The Kharkivan Cossacks, Tungstan
Advertisement