Elfen High 2 (OOC 5, Closed)

[Zarkenis Ultima]

...So Richard was Pride, then?

Or am I just confused?

You're confused.

Meh. Saw the black smoke part and assumed.

Also, Azazel seems fairly chill for someone who's Wrath. He'd probably fit something like madness more, but madness isn't a sin.

Whatever.

[Nationstatelandsville]

You're confused.

Meh. Saw the black smoke part and assumed.

Also, Azazel seems fairly chill for someone who's Wrath. He'd probably fit something like madness more, but madness isn't a sin.

Whatever.

Remember the Jameson quiet fury?

[Nightkill the Emperor]

You're confused.

Meh. Saw the black smoke part and assumed.

Also, Azazel seems fairly chill for someone who's Wrath. He'd probably fit something like madness more, but madness isn't a sin.

Whatever.

Wrath does not mean Rage.

[Zarkenis Ultima]

Meh. Saw the black smoke part and assumed.

Also, Azazel seems fairly chill for someone who's Wrath. He'd probably fit something like madness more, but madness isn't a sin.

Whatever.

Remember the Jameson quiet fury?

Well, yes, but Azazel doesn't even seem angry to me. As far as I can see, he's doing this for shits and giggles, not precisely malice (I don't know if that just made any sense, but whatever) or, and this is my point, rage.

[Nightkill the Emperor]

Now my next post.

[Zarkenis Ultima]

Meh. Saw the black smoke part and assumed.

Also, Azazel seems fairly chill for someone who's Wrath. He'd probably fit something like madness more, but madness isn't a sin.

Whatever.

Wrath does not mean Rage.

Ah.

Well, I'll have to check up definitions then. .

Whatever. I was just saying. I don't mean to complain or anything.

[Nationstatelandsville]

Remember the Jameson quiet fury?

Well, yes, but Azazel doesn't even seem angry to me. As far as I can see, he's doing this for shits and giggles, not precisely malice (I don't know if that just made any sense, but whatever) or, and this is my point, rage.

Wrath =/= rage.

Wrath has always been - to me - some kind of cruel sadism.

[Olthar]

...Is there a problem with the RP?

At all?

Honestly, it could be better, but I personally feel it's damn fun and damn good as it is.

Ditto. I'm not saying it hurts the RP; I'm just saying it doesn't help. It's like masturbation, really. Sex would have been better, but at least you're having an orgasm.

[Nationstatelandsville]

Honestly, it could be better, but I personally feel it's damn fun and damn good as it is.

Ditto. I'm not saying it hurts the RP; I'm just saying it doesn't help. It's like masturbation, really. Sex would have been better, but at least you're having an orgasm.

I'm really not seeing a problem.

[Zarkenis Ultima]

Well, yes, but Azazel doesn't even seem angry to me. As far as I can see, he's doing this for shits and giggles, not precisely malice (I don't know if that just made any sense, but whatever) or, and this is my point, rage.

Wrath =/= rage.

Wrath has always been - to me - some kind of cruel sadism.

-Shrug-

[Nationstatelandsville]

Wrath =/= rage.

Wrath has always been - to me - some kind of cruel sadism.

-Shrug-

Wrath is more of an act.

[Ende]

Ditto. I'm not saying it hurts the RP; I'm just saying it doesn't help. It's like masturbation, really. Sex would have been better, but at least you're having an orgasm.

I'm really not seeing a problem.

Yeah.

On an unrelated note, I'm looking forward to arc 3 - and is metalbending an acceptable power?

Just curious.

[Olthar]

Ditto. I'm not saying it hurts the RP; I'm just saying it doesn't help. It's like masturbation, really. Sex would have been better, but at least you're having an orgasm.

I'm really not seeing a problem.

RPs are best when they're player-acted and player-directed. The OP should, ideally, just be the producer and maybe the consulting director.

[Zarkenis Ultima]

-Shrug-

Wrath is more of an act.

I've always thought it was an emotion.

But again, I wasn't really sure, this is my opinion, I'm not complaining, etc.

[Nationstatelandsville]

I'm really not seeing a problem.

RPs are best when they're player-acted and player-directed. The OP should, ideally, just be the producer and maybe the consulting director.

In theory, yes.

But, again, I'm not seeing a single problem with this. All of the players are occupied.

Wrath is more of an act.

I've always thought it was an emotion.

But again, I wasn't really sure, this is my opinion, I'm not complaining, etc.

It's kind of a mix.

I'm just explaining it.

[Ende]

I'm really not seeing a problem.

RPs are best when they're player-acted and player-directed. The OP should, ideally, just be the producer and maybe the consulting director.

No, they definitely aren't. Have you seen player-acted and player-directed RPs? Go take a look over at F7, if you want that kind of thing.

Players are fucking stupid and you do not want them to be in charge of anything except their characters.

[Nationstatelandsville]

...I just realized that I've been spelling Nyarla's name wrong for nearly six months.

[Zarkenis Ultima]

RPs are best when they're player-acted and player-directed. The OP should, ideally, just be the producer and maybe the consulting director.

In theory, yes.

But, again, I'm not seeing a single problem with this. All of the players are occupied.

I've always thought it was an emotion.

But again, I wasn't really sure, this is my opinion, I'm not complaining, etc.

It's kind of a mix.

I'm just explaining it.

Yeeeaaahhh. All of them. .

And okay. I guess I'll check the definition sometime.

@Ende: But you do want to give them a great range of things they can influence to shape the world through the actions of their characters.

[Astrolinium]

...I just realized that I've been spelling Nyarla's name wrong for nearly six months.

FINALLY!

[Nationstatelandsville]

...I just realized that I've been spelling Nyarla's name wrong for nearly six months.

FINALLY!

To be fair, Nylara's a better name.

[Olthar]

RPs are best when they're player-acted and player-directed. The OP should, ideally, just be the producer and maybe the consulting director.

In theory, yes.

But, again, I'm not seeing a single problem with this. All of the players are occupied.

Occupied, yes. Important? Not necessarily. The story would be effectively unchanged if most of them simply vanished. Really, the only actually important character I can point to that isn't controlled by you or Night would be Ivy. None of the others are really at all meaningful.

[Zarkenis Ultima]

FINALLY!

To be fair, Nylara's a better name.

It does sound cool.

[Nationstatelandsville]

In theory, yes.

But, again, I'm not seeing a single problem with this. All of the players are occupied.

Occupied, yes. Important? Not necessarily. The story would be effectively unchanged if most of them simply vanished. Really, the only actually important character I can point to that isn't controlled by you or Night would be Ivy. None of the others are really at all meaningful.

I'm just saying - no one's complained before.

[Astrolinium]

FINALLY!

To be fair, Nylara's a better name.

Not when you consider the full name of Nyarlathotep.

[Zarkenis Ultima]

Occupied, yes. Important? Not necessarily. The story would be effectively unchanged if most of them simply vanished. Really, the only actually important character I can point to that isn't controlled by you or Night would be Ivy. None of the others are really at all meaningful.

I'm just saying - no one's complained before.

I personally think that, while Olthar is right, the protagonism issue was worse back in EH1 so at least we've made progress. -Nods-