[Submitted] Repeal "Liberate Republicans"

by **Captain Apollo** » Tue Dec 04, 2012 9:17 pm

I like how the defenders who are all for Native rights and bettering Natives are actively opposing this even with Native approval.

by **Sichuan Pepper** » Tue Dec 04, 2012 9:20 pm

While I believe having the liberation resolution on the region is a good thing I would support natives decision to have it removed.

by **Communist Eraser** » Tue Dec 04, 2012 9:34 pm

Personally, if I see any proposals with only 1 or 2 approvals left from quorum, I'll approve it. I have such a short attention span, and a crazed desire to see anything up, so I can clicky clicky vote that I don't consider implications for later proposals. And it's entertaining.

I'm pretty sure in the process I might of delayed the queue of something more worthy.

Edit: If Mousebumples is accused of anything, it'll only be the legal definition recklessness. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recklessness_(law)

"Recklessness usually arises when an accused is actually aware of the potentially adverse consequences to the planned actions, but has gone ahead anyway, exposing a particular individual or unknown victim to the risk of suffering the foreseen harm but not actually desiring that the victim be hurt."

Hardly the accusations that are she was an evil person that liked to dance of the ruins of destruction.

Edit 2: I should actually comment on the actual proposal.

Eastern Europe only supports the use of liberations as a temporary tool of expel external invaders. As there is no current threat to Republicians, SC would not be involved in influencing the long term governance of regions, and thus would return the region to its original state, with all its benefits and consequences.

by **Cromarty** » Wed Dec 05, 2012 1:31 am

Captain Apollo wrote:I like how the defenders who are all for Native rights and bettering Natives are actively opposing this even with Native approval.

Hey.

You see me?

I'm a defender.

I'm for this resolution.

by **The Great Destruction** » Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:05 am

meh. I feel like this resolution is a non issue. That being said, I am almost always voting for liberations

by **Frattastan II** » Thu Dec 06, 2012 4:44 pm

Captain Apollo wrote:I like how the defenders who are all for Native rights and bettering Natives are actively opposing this even with Native approval.

I opposed it before Native support for the repeal was expressed, unless I am just that bad at reading timestamps.

by **Firstaria** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:35 am

Just a simple question. Opinion of the natives?

by **Mousebumples** » Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:42 am

Firstaria wrote:Just a simple question. Opinion of the natives?

See this post on page two.

(I'm too lazy to use the quote feature and jive with this one, but TL;DR - this repeal has native support.)

by **Jeffersonian Republicans** » Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:25 pm

Is no one going to put this forward?

I'd be happy to help someone draft a different version if need be.

by **Frattastan II** » Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:05 pm

Try telegramming Capitan Apollo to see if he still wants to submit it.

by **Captain Apollo** » Thu Aug 07, 2014 10:51 pm

Jeffersonian Republicans wrote:Is no one going to put this forward?

I'd be happy to help someone draft a different version if need be.

Wow does time fly. I just remembered this for some reason. Shooting you a TG to see if this is still what you want.

by **Bears Armed** » Fri Aug 08, 2014 2:39 am

Does it still have significant native support?

by **Ainocra** » Tue Aug 12, 2014 5:41 pm

I see no valid reason that the natives should not be able to defend themselves if they so choose.
Support

by **Mundiferrum** » Wed Aug 13, 2014 3:16 am

I have this itchy feeling in my thymus that if this were to pass, Republicans would be quickly assimilated into the raider trophy cabinet. I mean, sure, it has a founder, but the fact that it has a founder can also be used in defense of the liberation; plus the region is devoid of any WA members or, well, activity.

by **Captain Apollo** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 10:05 am

Submitted.

by **Bhang Bhang Duc** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 10:16 am

Captain Apollo wrote:Submitted.

Good grief, nearly 4 years between first draft and submission. Is that a record?

Good luck with this Captain.

by **We Are Not the NSA** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 11:25 am

Captain Apollo wrote:Submitted.

Lol, would've liked a little warning, but I see nothing wrong with the proposal, in either its text or its merit. I've requested that Tom approve it.

I won't say whether or not I support it until I get a more recent opinion on it from the natives.

by **Cormactopia II** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 5:55 pm

Wow, this is a blast from the past. Approved. Can't say for sure how I'll vote on it, that's up to our citizens. Best of luck!

by **Captain Apollo** » Wed Jan 23, 2019 5:26 pm

The native founder, which has been restored, has been contacted to see if there is support for this repeal.

by **The Stalker** » Thu Jan 24, 2019 11:56 am

The founder is a friend of mine, he doesn't want this repealed. He's said so in other attempts I believe.

Also he is very inactive so I think it be a bad idea in addition to being against the natives' wishes.

Edit: Seems like in 2012 he did say he wanted it passed, though when I spoke to him he didn't. I would say if he still wants it passed to go for it. I just don't think he still does and being inactive I don't think it's a good idea.

[Submitted] Repeal "Liberate Republicans"

Who is online