by Central Slavia » Sun Dec 13, 2009 12:28 pm
Glorious Homeland wrote:
You would be wrong. There's something wrong with the Americans, the Japanese are actually insane, the Chinese don't seem capable of free-thought and just defer judgement to the most powerful strong man, the Russians are quite like that, only more aggressive and mad, and Belarus? Hah.
Omnicracy wrote:The Soviet Union did not support pro-Soviet governments, it compleatly controled them. The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions
Great Nepal wrote:Please stick to OFFICIAL numbers. Why to go to scholars,[cut]
by Karaden » Sun Dec 13, 2009 2:12 pm
by Central Slavia » Sun Dec 13, 2009 2:16 pm
Glorious Homeland wrote:
You would be wrong. There's something wrong with the Americans, the Japanese are actually insane, the Chinese don't seem capable of free-thought and just defer judgement to the most powerful strong man, the Russians are quite like that, only more aggressive and mad, and Belarus? Hah.
Omnicracy wrote:The Soviet Union did not support pro-Soviet governments, it compleatly controled them. The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions
Great Nepal wrote:Please stick to OFFICIAL numbers. Why to go to scholars,[cut]
by United Russian State » Sat Dec 19, 2009 3:29 am
by Central Slavia » Sat Dec 19, 2009 3:53 am
Glorious Homeland wrote:
You would be wrong. There's something wrong with the Americans, the Japanese are actually insane, the Chinese don't seem capable of free-thought and just defer judgement to the most powerful strong man, the Russians are quite like that, only more aggressive and mad, and Belarus? Hah.
Omnicracy wrote:The Soviet Union did not support pro-Soviet governments, it compleatly controled them. The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions
Great Nepal wrote:Please stick to OFFICIAL numbers. Why to go to scholars,[cut]
by Noordeinde » Sun Dec 20, 2009 11:26 am
by Central Slavia » Mon Dec 21, 2009 1:36 pm
Glorious Homeland wrote:
You would be wrong. There's something wrong with the Americans, the Japanese are actually insane, the Chinese don't seem capable of free-thought and just defer judgement to the most powerful strong man, the Russians are quite like that, only more aggressive and mad, and Belarus? Hah.
Omnicracy wrote:The Soviet Union did not support pro-Soviet governments, it compleatly controled them. The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions
Great Nepal wrote:Please stick to OFFICIAL numbers. Why to go to scholars,[cut]
by Mirnect » Mon Dec 21, 2009 1:44 pm
Name of State: The Kingdom of Mirnect.
Name of Ambassador: Euan Reid.
Short description of ambassador: Career diplomat – this is his first ambassadorial post.
# of diplomatic staff: 10.
# of security staff, if any: 5.
# of maintenance staff (0 means you will employ locally) : 10.
Automobiles , if any: 2 Swan-7 Luxury Cars.
Weapons, if any: M11 Cardinal semi-automatic pistols.
Special: None.
by Central Slavia » Thu Dec 24, 2009 3:03 pm
Glorious Homeland wrote:
You would be wrong. There's something wrong with the Americans, the Japanese are actually insane, the Chinese don't seem capable of free-thought and just defer judgement to the most powerful strong man, the Russians are quite like that, only more aggressive and mad, and Belarus? Hah.
Omnicracy wrote:The Soviet Union did not support pro-Soviet governments, it compleatly controled them. The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions
Great Nepal wrote:Please stick to OFFICIAL numbers. Why to go to scholars,[cut]
by Acadianne » Thu Dec 24, 2009 3:26 pm
Dear Sir or Madame:
Enclosed is The Republic of Acadianne's embassy application
Name of State: The Republic of Acadianne
Name of Ambassador: David Sheppherd
Short description of ambassador: Former Acadianne soldier, diplomat for the last 10 years, 39 years old
# of diplomatic staff: 5
# of security staff, if any: 10
# of maintenance staff (0 means you will employ locally) : 12
Automobiles , if any: 1 BMW 528i Sedan, 2 Ford Escape Hybrids
Weapons, if any: 10 Desert Eagle Mark XIX Sidearms, 10 M16 assault rifles (in weapon's locker)
Special: N/A
Yours,
/S/ Edwin O'Quinn
Secretary of State
Republic of Acadianne
by Beffin » Thu Dec 24, 2009 3:55 pm
by Central Slavia » Sat Dec 26, 2009 7:30 pm
Glorious Homeland wrote:
You would be wrong. There's something wrong with the Americans, the Japanese are actually insane, the Chinese don't seem capable of free-thought and just defer judgement to the most powerful strong man, the Russians are quite like that, only more aggressive and mad, and Belarus? Hah.
Omnicracy wrote:The Soviet Union did not support pro-Soviet governments, it compleatly controled them. The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions
Great Nepal wrote:Please stick to OFFICIAL numbers. Why to go to scholars,[cut]
by Chezovolvia » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:12 pm
by Central Slavia » Thu Jan 07, 2010 7:10 pm
Glorious Homeland wrote:
You would be wrong. There's something wrong with the Americans, the Japanese are actually insane, the Chinese don't seem capable of free-thought and just defer judgement to the most powerful strong man, the Russians are quite like that, only more aggressive and mad, and Belarus? Hah.
Omnicracy wrote:The Soviet Union did not support pro-Soviet governments, it compleatly controled them. The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions
Great Nepal wrote:Please stick to OFFICIAL numbers. Why to go to scholars,[cut]
by Seculartopia » Thu Jan 07, 2010 7:15 pm
Rhodmire wrote:4/5 for being bold enough to put up what looks like something made from MS Paint.
That takes balls, and you've got them.
All was dark when the armies surrounded the town. There was little bloodshed as they swept in, and they quickly took control. "Success," said a communicator, "a base has been established."
OOC:There. Now, we'll wait for UK to catch up.
by Central Slavia » Thu Jan 07, 2010 7:17 pm
Glorious Homeland wrote:
You would be wrong. There's something wrong with the Americans, the Japanese are actually insane, the Chinese don't seem capable of free-thought and just defer judgement to the most powerful strong man, the Russians are quite like that, only more aggressive and mad, and Belarus? Hah.
Omnicracy wrote:The Soviet Union did not support pro-Soviet governments, it compleatly controled them. The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions
Great Nepal wrote:Please stick to OFFICIAL numbers. Why to go to scholars,[cut]
by Seculartopia » Thu Jan 07, 2010 7:20 pm
Central Slavia wrote:accepted
Rhodmire wrote:4/5 for being bold enough to put up what looks like something made from MS Paint.
That takes balls, and you've got them.
All was dark when the armies surrounded the town. There was little bloodshed as they swept in, and they quickly took control. "Success," said a communicator, "a base has been established."
OOC:There. Now, we'll wait for UK to catch up.
by Allrule » Thu Jan 07, 2010 7:22 pm
by Central Slavia » Thu Jan 07, 2010 7:27 pm
Glorious Homeland wrote:
You would be wrong. There's something wrong with the Americans, the Japanese are actually insane, the Chinese don't seem capable of free-thought and just defer judgement to the most powerful strong man, the Russians are quite like that, only more aggressive and mad, and Belarus? Hah.
Omnicracy wrote:The Soviet Union did not support pro-Soviet governments, it compleatly controled them. The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions
Great Nepal wrote:Please stick to OFFICIAL numbers. Why to go to scholars,[cut]
by Solyhniya » Sun Feb 14, 2010 7:58 am
Dimoniquid wrote:Dear God, Solyhniya, you kick so much ass!
Skaladora wrote:Christians in general and Catholics in particular should stop giving more weight to the words of random morons, and listen more closely to what the guy they believe to have been the son of God has been saying.
United human countries wrote:Funniest joke is one you don't have to explain.
Unless they don't get it.
by Central Slavia » Sun Feb 14, 2010 9:39 am
Glorious Homeland wrote:
You would be wrong. There's something wrong with the Americans, the Japanese are actually insane, the Chinese don't seem capable of free-thought and just defer judgement to the most powerful strong man, the Russians are quite like that, only more aggressive and mad, and Belarus? Hah.
Omnicracy wrote:The Soviet Union did not support pro-Soviet governments, it compleatly controled them. The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions
Great Nepal wrote:Please stick to OFFICIAL numbers. Why to go to scholars,[cut]
by Solyhniya » Sun Feb 14, 2010 9:46 am
Dimoniquid wrote:Dear God, Solyhniya, you kick so much ass!
Skaladora wrote:Christians in general and Catholics in particular should stop giving more weight to the words of random morons, and listen more closely to what the guy they believe to have been the son of God has been saying.
United human countries wrote:Funniest joke is one you don't have to explain.
Unless they don't get it.
by Polska rzczpolspolita » Tue Feb 16, 2010 7:50 pm
by Central Slavia » Fri Feb 26, 2010 7:14 pm
Glorious Homeland wrote:
You would be wrong. There's something wrong with the Americans, the Japanese are actually insane, the Chinese don't seem capable of free-thought and just defer judgement to the most powerful strong man, the Russians are quite like that, only more aggressive and mad, and Belarus? Hah.
Omnicracy wrote:The Soviet Union did not support pro-Soviet governments, it compleatly controled them. The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions
Great Nepal wrote:Please stick to OFFICIAL numbers. Why to go to scholars,[cut]
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Elfland, Molibdenand, Townsvalley
Advertisement