by Hydesland » Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:12 pm
by Station 12 » Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:14 pm
Birnadia wrote:JOY unit is perfection. JOY unit cannot be questioned.
Verlorenen wrote:I might be a cold-hearted fascist, but honestly - Station 12, your posts scare the living hell out of me.
Manahakatouki wrote:I would but you scare the crap out of me....your nation anyway.....
New Caldaris wrote:LOL dude i rarely see your posts but when i do i am either laughing or terrified at the thought someone could even say something so sinister and evil.
Lockswania wrote:Station twelve, you scare me.
The Eurasican Union wrote:Station 12, My leader might be corrupt and evil on the inside, but if he was on your station, he'd jump into space as a form of suicide.
by Flameswroth » Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:26 pm
Czardas wrote:Why should we bail out climate change with billions of dollars, when lesbians are starving in the streets because they can't afford an abortion?
Reagan Clone wrote:What you are proposing is glorifying God by loving, respecting, or at least tolerating, his other creations.
That is the gayest fucking shit I've ever heard, and I had Barry Manilow perform at the White House in '82.
by Pevisopolis » Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:28 pm
Hydesland wrote:Climate Change was viable since its inception, it is wrong to abort something that is viable. It is evident that this is the case as no scientist has been able to disprove this. Therefore the freedom for women to choose between aborting Global Warming and not aborting it must be removed. Do you believe that aborting Climate Change is wrong, or are you agnostic on the issue? If you are not at least agnostic on the issue you are obviously part of Obama's communistic revolution which will destroy the global economy, whilst simultaneously not actually changing anything at all as he is merely more of the same. This is because despite what Obama says, it is proven that he is a compulsive liar (proof: you can't DISPROVE it, therefore it is true), meaning he is clearly both Islamic and atheistic on the position of Global Warming abortion, lying only to justify his communistic fiscal stimulus. But being atheistic is ludicrous, as you CAN'T KNOW FOR SURE if aborting Global Warming is wrong or not, we should humble ourselves towards the fact that we do not know everything in the universe. It is clear that Climate Change's bank bonus is disgustingly large, but it must not be aborted as giving women the freedom to do so is wrong, this is true as you cannot show it isn't true, and believing for certain that it isn't true like some dirty atheists do is insane.
Thoughts?
by My 3rd Floor Flat » Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:32 pm
by Hydesland » Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:44 pm
My 3rd Floor Flat wrote:Absoloute nonsense of an unparalled order. Clearly this is right wing properganda of which you yourself are a member of the famed Blitzkreig Greepeace faction of the Fundamentalist Baptist Church of Southern America. Whilst global warming itself is a defunct term which was long ago aborted by the scientific community, but still causes significant controversy in the general public, I have to say that it's general confusion surrounding the nature of the Irag Wars for oil is quite clearly associated with a right wing agenda in order to further provoke more climate minded individuals in their efforts to surpass peak oil and create yet more Johnsons Baby Oil so that they can profit when they succeed in driving forth their anti-abortion laws thus leading to a spike in the overall baby population in the globe. Evidently serious scientific action must be taken in the form of an Moral Objectivist revolution to enable the Great Chain of Industry to steer society in the right diretion away from communist fervour and Right Wing lunacy. Only the third way can see us to a new age of peace and propserity!
As such I answer "No, Yes and Maybe."
by The Black Forrest » Fri Dec 18, 2009 2:32 pm
Hydesland wrote:Climate Change was viable since its inception, it is wrong to abort something that is viable. It is evident that this is the case as no scientist has been able to disprove this. Therefore the freedom for women to choose between aborting Global Warming and not aborting it must be removed. Do you believe that aborting Climate Change is wrong, or are you agnostic on the issue? If you are not at least agnostic on the issue you are obviously part of Obama's communistic revolution which will destroy the global economy, whilst simultaneously not actually changing anything at all as he is merely more of the same. This is because despite what Obama says, it is proven that he is a compulsive liar (proof: you can't DISPROVE it, therefore it is true), meaning he is clearly both Islamic and atheistic on the position of Global Warming abortion, lying only to justify his communistic fiscal stimulus. But being atheistic is ludicrous, as you CAN'T KNOW FOR SURE if aborting Global Warming is wrong or not, we should humble ourselves towards the fact that we do not know everything in the universe. It is clear that Climate Change's bank bonus is disgustingly large, but it must not be aborted as giving women the freedom to do so is wrong, this is true as you cannot show it isn't true, and believing for certain that it isn't true like some dirty atheists do is insane.
Thoughts?
by Czardas » Fri Dec 18, 2009 2:41 pm
by The Republic of Lanos » Fri Dec 18, 2009 2:43 pm
Czardas wrote:Nonsense. The theory of evolution by natural selection clearly states that climate change must have evolved for survival. As I have already expressed, abortion is a viable means of ensuring the survival of the species for it weeds out unfit members of the group, contributing to survival of the fittest. The evolutionary imperative states that climate change must be aborted. Moreover, Obama clearly supports evolution, since he is the savior of mankind who clearly deserved his Nobel Peace Prize. His healthcare reform plan, which will be successful and end the recession in combination with his stimulus plan, contained provisions specifically earmarked for abortion of climate change, indicating that he supports it, and since Obama was elected by a lawful majority of the American people he is obviously right to propose this, despite the collectivising implications which threaten our capitalist American society. So in conclusion, you obviously don't know what you're talking about, and Source?
by Strykla » Fri Dec 18, 2009 2:44 pm
by The Republic of Lanos » Fri Dec 18, 2009 2:44 pm
Strykla wrote:What does abortion have to do with climate change?
by Czardas » Fri Dec 18, 2009 2:45 pm
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Czardas wrote:Nonsense. The theory of evolution by natural selection clearly states that climate change must have evolved for survival. As I have already expressed, abortion is a viable means of ensuring the survival of the species for it weeds out unfit members of the group, contributing to survival of the fittest. The evolutionary imperative states that climate change must be aborted. Moreover, Obama clearly supports evolution, since he is the savior of mankind who clearly deserved his Nobel Peace Prize. His healthcare reform plan, which will be successful and end the recession in combination with his stimulus plan, contained provisions specifically earmarked for abortion of climate change, indicating that he supports it, and since Obama was elected by a lawful majority of the American people he is obviously right to propose this, despite the collectivising implications which threaten our capitalist American society. So in conclusion, you obviously don't know what you're talking about, and Source?
*head asplodes*
I'm sorry, what? i don't want that pile of shit they call reform.
by Arresyl » Fri Dec 18, 2009 2:46 pm
Ah, the pages with no print on them?
Yes... Those are the most epic of all... It leaves the ending and beginning entirely to the reader's imagination...
Beautiful.
Wutaco wrote:
I suppose if you want to get technical, you can level Manhatten with a nuke. But that as you can guess, is a no no. Because the US will then blow the living shit out of your country and be partying in the ruins within an hour.
Dontgonearthere wrote:
The effectiveness of the US military (in terms of killing people) cannot be denied. When the US wants to reduce something to a cratered wasteland, that place gets reduced to a cratered wasteland.
by Kalakda » Fri Dec 18, 2009 2:50 pm
by Conserative Morality » Fri Dec 18, 2009 2:54 pm
by The Republic of Lanos » Fri Dec 18, 2009 2:56 pm
Maurepas wrote:I've always wondered what it would be like when Hydes posted High, it certainly didnt disappoint,
by Station 12 » Fri Dec 18, 2009 2:56 pm
Kalakda wrote:Man-made Global Warming is just a bunch of crap.
Birnadia wrote:JOY unit is perfection. JOY unit cannot be questioned.
Verlorenen wrote:I might be a cold-hearted fascist, but honestly - Station 12, your posts scare the living hell out of me.
Manahakatouki wrote:I would but you scare the crap out of me....your nation anyway.....
New Caldaris wrote:LOL dude i rarely see your posts but when i do i am either laughing or terrified at the thought someone could even say something so sinister and evil.
Lockswania wrote:Station twelve, you scare me.
The Eurasican Union wrote:Station 12, My leader might be corrupt and evil on the inside, but if he was on your station, he'd jump into space as a form of suicide.
by Uawc » Fri Dec 18, 2009 2:57 pm
by The New Everlasting » Fri Dec 18, 2009 2:59 pm
by Hydesland » Fri Dec 18, 2009 3:04 pm
by Station 12 » Fri Dec 18, 2009 3:08 pm
Birnadia wrote:JOY unit is perfection. JOY unit cannot be questioned.
Verlorenen wrote:I might be a cold-hearted fascist, but honestly - Station 12, your posts scare the living hell out of me.
Manahakatouki wrote:I would but you scare the crap out of me....your nation anyway.....
New Caldaris wrote:LOL dude i rarely see your posts but when i do i am either laughing or terrified at the thought someone could even say something so sinister and evil.
Lockswania wrote:Station twelve, you scare me.
The Eurasican Union wrote:Station 12, My leader might be corrupt and evil on the inside, but if he was on your station, he'd jump into space as a form of suicide.
by Czardas » Fri Dec 18, 2009 3:15 pm
Hydesland wrote:Czardas, you disgust me. If you look at the structure of Climate Change, it is quite evident that it is intelligently designed, not evolved, you are blinded to its irreducible complexity. And there is a crucial point that everyone is missing, Climate Change DOESN'T have equal rights, as although heterosexuals CAN choose to marry who they love, Climate Change can't. This is why we should allow for a system whereby Climate Change can marry its bank bonus, I understand your concerns about adoption, but I am confident that they can prove to be excellent parents, as long as it remains efficiently regulated rather than aborted.
by H N Fiddlebottoms VIII » Fri Dec 18, 2009 3:17 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Avzeria, Cyptopir, Duvniask, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Gravlen, Ineva, Kannap, Kaztropol, Kerwa, Lothria, Lower Nubia, Lycom, Nanatsu no Tsuki, Omphalos, The Jamesian Republic, Tiami, Tungstan, Uiiop, Valrifall, Zurkerx
Advertisement